honda crx vs Lamborgini
#1
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 704
honda crx vs Lamborgini
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47e_1191294022
i find it hard to believe that crappy looking honda can actually beat a lambo, check out for yourself.
i find it hard to believe that crappy looking honda can actually beat a lambo, check out for yourself.
#6
Originally Posted by Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226
find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....
Yeah cuz towards the end a porsche and the crx race and the porsche smokes the crx.
#8
Originally Posted by CDogbert
Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?
And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>
And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>
The people that put ____ like that on the internet daily. lol
#9
#13
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday
(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
#14
ok this is just to get the honduh fanboys excited.
next u'll see a 198x civic hatch takin an Ferrari FXX or a Koenigsegg CCX...
then u'll see a 2007 Civic SI take a Ducati 999RR or an Aprilla...
that thing is staged!
next u'll see a 198x civic hatch takin an Ferrari FXX or a Koenigsegg CCX...
then u'll see a 2007 Civic SI take a Ducati 999RR or an Aprilla...
that thing is staged!
#15
Originally Posted by scionBoy86
u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo
#16
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
I can't believe people are dumb enough to think this is fake. The CRX Si only weighs 1890 lbs from the factory. Gut the interior, lose the A/C, add some CF and it's easily down to 1500lbs. Throw a B18C5 or K20 in it, turbo it and you're looking at 350-400whp and 1700lbs. Now compare that to the Lambo which is at about 500whp and 3638. 100 HP =/= 1900 lbs.
#17
Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!
A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).
Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.
Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).
Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.
Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
#19
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
Originally Posted by xbizzle562
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday
(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
the other video was from a roll.
big difference.
and thats also a 1200HP Supra Not a Lambo
#20
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
Originally Posted by CDogbert
Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!
A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).
Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.
Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).
Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.
Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.
or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.