Notices
All Other Vehicles Concepts and non-Toyotas...

honda crx vs Lamborgini

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2008, 04:23 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
geo46_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 704
Default honda crx vs Lamborgini

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47e_1191294022

i find it hard to believe that crappy looking honda can actually beat a lambo, check out for yourself.
geo46_2 is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 04:30 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

Why? That CRX probably weighs 1800 lbs with a full tank and a driver. It probably only would need 300-350 whp to smoke that Lambo.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 04:43 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Dispatcher138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Derty Jerz 908
Posts: 1,306
Default

I'd still rather be driving that lambo.
Dispatcher138 is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 01:13 PM
  #4  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,961
Default

the song in the video sucked dingle berries...
jct is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 04:25 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Balliztik
SL Member
 
Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 3,338
Default

find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....
Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226 is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:45 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Dispatcher138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Derty Jerz 908
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226
find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....

Yeah cuz towards the end a porsche and the crx race and the porsche smokes the crx.
Dispatcher138 is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
CDogbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: N38° 37', W90° 17'
Posts: 1,906
Default

Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>
CDogbert is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Dispatcher138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Derty Jerz 908
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by CDogbert
Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>


The people that put ____ like that on the internet daily. lol
Dispatcher138 is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 06:32 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
xbizzle562's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default


http://videos.streetfire.net/video/G...008_145565.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/S...-in_146327.htm
xbizzle562 is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 06:10 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
scionBoy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
Default

u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo
scionBoy86 is offline  
Old 07-14-2008, 01:45 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
xbizzle562's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default

I know you weren't talking about the Supra vs tha lambo scionBoy86 cause that LP640 was Owned buy that Supra and that Lambo was at full throttle and with a 2 second head start to boot
xbizzle562 is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 06:47 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
Default

Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
yellowxhoodie is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 08:04 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
xbizzle562's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/7...whp_168259.htm
xbizzle562 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 08:30 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
scionkidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Default

ok this is just to get the honduh fanboys excited.

next u'll see a 198x civic hatch takin an Ferrari FXX or a Koenigsegg CCX...

then u'll see a 2007 Civic SI take a Ducati 999RR or an Aprilla...

that thing is staged!
scionkidd is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 08:35 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
scionkidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Default

Originally Posted by scionBoy86
u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo
http://youtube.com/watch?v=TWN_lbtVxIg
scionkidd is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 12:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

I can't believe people are dumb enough to think this is fake. The CRX Si only weighs 1890 lbs from the factory. Gut the interior, lose the A/C, add some CF and it's easily down to 1500lbs. Throw a B18C5 or K20 in it, turbo it and you're looking at 350-400whp and 1700lbs. Now compare that to the Lambo which is at about 500whp and 3638. 100 HP =/= 1900 lbs.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:20 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
CDogbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: N38° 37', W90° 17'
Posts: 1,906
Default

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
CDogbert is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:31 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
SchaumburgScionJT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Schaumburg Scion/ Toyota
Posts: 618
Default

makes sense to me haha
SchaumburgScionJT3 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 03:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
Default

Originally Posted by xbizzle562
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/7...whp_168259.htm
that was from a dig.
the other video was from a roll.
big difference.

and thats also a 1200HP Supra Not a Lambo
yellowxhoodie is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 03:10 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
Default

Originally Posted by CDogbert
Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
o man.
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.

or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.
yellowxhoodie is offline  


Quick Reply: honda crx vs Lamborgini



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM.