Koenigsegg bought Saab WOOOOO
#1
Koenigsegg bought Saab WOOOOO
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/16/o...nt-to-buy-saab
After days of speculation and rumor, General Motors made it official this morning, Saab will soon be back in Swedish hands. In many respects, this is the most fitting result for quirky brand. Koenigsegg is an oddball itself, building insanely fast supercars in a Scandinavian country where you can't legally drive over about 60 mph.
The deal will be partly financed through a $600 million loan from the European Investment Bank that is co-signed by the Swedish government. Just as GM will continue to provide Penske-owned Saturn with cars for a time, it will supply platforms and powertrains to Saab. The length of time that Saab will continue to use GM hardware hasn't been disclosed, but it will likely be for at least the next 5-6 years – if not longer. The new 9-5 which will be built in Trollhättan, Sweden is launching later this year followed by the 9-4X crossover. Both of these will probably complete their lifecycle on current platforms. The same is likely true for the 9-1 which may launch in 2010 or 2011. The big question mark will be the next generation 9-3, which had been expected to move to GM's Delta II platform.
After days of speculation and rumor, General Motors made it official this morning, Saab will soon be back in Swedish hands. In many respects, this is the most fitting result for quirky brand. Koenigsegg is an oddball itself, building insanely fast supercars in a Scandinavian country where you can't legally drive over about 60 mph.
The deal will be partly financed through a $600 million loan from the European Investment Bank that is co-signed by the Swedish government. Just as GM will continue to provide Penske-owned Saturn with cars for a time, it will supply platforms and powertrains to Saab. The length of time that Saab will continue to use GM hardware hasn't been disclosed, but it will likely be for at least the next 5-6 years – if not longer. The new 9-5 which will be built in Trollhättan, Sweden is launching later this year followed by the 9-4X crossover. Both of these will probably complete their lifecycle on current platforms. The same is likely true for the 9-1 which may launch in 2010 or 2011. The big question mark will be the next generation 9-3, which had been expected to move to GM's Delta II platform.
#2
Re: Koenigsegg bought Saab WOOOOO
Originally Posted by jct
...The deal will be partly financed through a $600 million loan from the European Investment Bank that is co-signed by the Swedish government.....
#7
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
I still don't see how this is beneficial for anyone.
From the Swedish government's point of view they keep an industry operating and therefore the votes of the employees. Folks are obviously concerned:
#9
Well the Combination of the 2 will either result in better Saabs, or more affordable K-Siggs
One would THINKKKKK
That or they would just be like here is a saab, we made it marginally better but not really back to the quirky roots just yet.
One would THINKKKKK
That or they would just be like here is a saab, we made it marginally better but not really back to the quirky roots just yet.
#11
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Well VW owns Lambo and Porsche and we haven't seen any kind of affordable Lambo or any kind of VW supercar.
Companies usually buy out other ones to use their technology. Ford bought Volvo pretty much for the safety features, and the Focus ended up becoming one of the safest cars on the road. I just don't see how either company can benefit from this (other than Saab completely imploding if it didn't get a buyer).
Companies usually buy out other ones to use their technology. Ford bought Volvo pretty much for the safety features, and the Focus ended up becoming one of the safest cars on the road. I just don't see how either company can benefit from this (other than Saab completely imploding if it didn't get a buyer).
#15
actually, porsche isn't owned by VW, VW owns audi and lamborghini AND bentley, and has a partnership with porsche, although porsche has been trying to buy audi, i believe it was because they wanted access to some of audi's engines for their cars, but VW refused, so porsche is trying to buy them so that they just take them.
as for more affordable lambo's, what do you call the audi R8? granted it is still very expensive, but it is essentially a cheaper lambo.
anybody remember the vw phaeton? it was the flagship VW car with over 400 bhp. it sold for 80 grand, which is great when you consider it is the same car as the bentley continental GT and flying spur.
now, for koenigsegg benefits, look at ferrari, very low volume exclusive car brand with limited sales, but they are owned by fiat, who makes lots of money selling high volume economical cars, which helps make the r&d on ferrari's possible.
the reason why volvo owns shares in koenigsegg is because they arranged a trade so that they could borrow their wind tunnel. so koenigsegg probably wants access to more of saabs testing grounds and research devices, and the sale of their cars could go to developing better supercars.
as for more affordable lambo's, what do you call the audi R8? granted it is still very expensive, but it is essentially a cheaper lambo.
anybody remember the vw phaeton? it was the flagship VW car with over 400 bhp. it sold for 80 grand, which is great when you consider it is the same car as the bentley continental GT and flying spur.
now, for koenigsegg benefits, look at ferrari, very low volume exclusive car brand with limited sales, but they are owned by fiat, who makes lots of money selling high volume economical cars, which helps make the r&d on ferrari's possible.
the reason why volvo owns shares in koenigsegg is because they arranged a trade so that they could borrow their wind tunnel. so koenigsegg probably wants access to more of saabs testing grounds and research devices, and the sale of their cars could go to developing better supercars.
#16
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by George
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
I still don't see how this is beneficial for anyone.
From the Swedish government's point of view they keep an industry operating and therefore the votes of the employees. Folks are obviously concerned:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post