bOhEmIo82

Out of these three which should I get, and why?

woof

The S2000 isn't a bloated land-hog like the 350Z. It's more agile, eco-friendly, and less expensive to own. The 350Z just isn't a driver's car.

bOhEmIo82

LOL, that's pretty funny. But seriously I like the 350. Yes the S2000 is definitely the drivers car between those 2, but I would feel really bad about spending $35,000 for this car, with the interior as bland as it is.... The 350 is still pretty fast, and has way more room for amenities. I would feel better about spending that kind of money knowing that I have way more options from factory as far as cosmetics go.... I have more options with the 350, and at the price Honda asks for the S2K, I would have a loaded 350. The Z starts at 27 & change. The S2K starts at 33 & change. I definitely have perfromance in mind, but I want an nice looking car too! (inside, and out)

bOhEmIo82

What about the STI???

scionofPCFL

between the S2000 and 350? dunno really, but most likely the 350. It's just a lot more comfortable.

between all 3? the STI. I like 4drs and I like the 4wd.

speddlysmitt

WRX is the most practical. 4 Doors and a good size trunk. AWD for snow. But if you have a daily driver beater car I would go for the s2000.

amanda776

I voted 350.. there's just something about that car...

Camo_Xb

I have an S2000 and I would still say I would buy another one. It's definitely not a good daily driver, no torque down low....etc

2redgerm6

woofs silly. the 350z is a daily drivers car. and a full out race car with the rite mods. no matter if you want a quarter mile car or a time attack it has unlimited potential. not to say anything bad about the other 2 cars they are great too, but to call the 350z a land hog is just silly. i personally would vote and did vote for the 350z (duh lol). btw they don't run bloated land hog in the jgtc!