Death Penalty
#6
Originally Posted by GammaTNT
They don't work. Texas have the most Death Penalty, and I don't think its crime rate is the lowest.
So Death Penalty does not deter crimes.
So Death Penalty does not deter crimes.
I don't see capital punishment as a very effective deterrent either, but the people who are executed aren't going to get out and harm anyone else...ever.
#7
It is a necessary evil, and like what other were jokingly saying they aren't going to kill or break the law anymore. It may not be a deturnant but it is one less horrible person taking up valuable cell space as many jails are all ready overfilled.
Personally I think after the trial is all said and done they need to hurry up the killing. I hate the appeal and legal crap that seems to just complicate everything.
Personally I think after the trial is all said and done they need to hurry up the killing. I hate the appeal and legal crap that seems to just complicate everything.
#12
Originally Posted by scionofPCFL
In principal, I agree with it, in practice that's another story.
If the evidence is overwhelming, hellz yeah.
If your public defender falls asleep during trial, well that's another story.
If the evidence is overwhelming, hellz yeah.
If your public defender falls asleep during trial, well that's another story.
#13
Originally Posted by teamben158
Originally Posted by scionofPCFL
In principal, I agree with it, in practice that's another story.
If the evidence is overwhelming, hellz yeah.
If your public defender falls asleep during trial, well that's another story.
If the evidence is overwhelming, hellz yeah.
If your public defender falls asleep during trial, well that's another story.
#14
#15
the death penalty is ludacris.
it absolutely sickens me that we live in a culture where it is socially acceptable to execute human beings.
And being "Texas tough on crime" is not exactly something i would be proud of any day.
it absolutely sickens me that we live in a culture where it is socially acceptable to execute human beings.
And being "Texas tough on crime" is not exactly something i would be proud of any day.
#16
I think that if there is unrefutable proof that you killed someone in cold blood, you should be executed. No 20 year death row, just execute them. If someone killed your mom/dad/brother/sister/wife/husband, Im sure you would change your mind Chris.
#17
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
I think that if there is unrefutable proof that you killed someone in cold blood, you should be executed. No 20 year death row, just execute them. If someone killed your mom/dad/brother/sister/wife/husband, Im sure you would change your mind Chris.
For those of you with kids... If your child got suspended for sheating on a test and his argument for cheating was "my friend did it first" you would tell him that it does not matter and cheating is wrong. This is no different.
#18
My grandparents were both murdered 3 years ago for about $50, 2 rings, and a watch. I definately did not wish then, nor now do i wish that person to be executed. My parents made it very clear to the lawyer prosecuting that we did not want an execution to take place, and instead the gentleman was sentenced to life in prison.
Murder is murder, whether it be random or premeditated, or state-sanctioned.
I dont care if there is video evidence, DNA evidence, and a supreme court justice as a witness to a crime...there should not be state-sanctioned executions.
Crime rates are lower in other civilized countries in this world...and we are the only 1st world country with a death penalty.
The problem is we focus on the punishment for what you do wrong while everyone else focuses on the rewards of doing right.
Murder is murder, whether it be random or premeditated, or state-sanctioned.
I dont care if there is video evidence, DNA evidence, and a supreme court justice as a witness to a crime...there should not be state-sanctioned executions.
Crime rates are lower in other civilized countries in this world...and we are the only 1st world country with a death penalty.
The problem is we focus on the punishment for what you do wrong while everyone else focuses on the rewards of doing right.
#20
Originally Posted by citizen01
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
I think that if there is unrefutable proof that you killed someone in cold blood, you should be executed. No 20 year death row, just execute them. If someone killed your mom/dad/brother/sister/wife/husband, Im sure you would change your mind Chris.
For those of you with kids... If your child got suspended for sheating on a test and his argument for cheating was "my friend did it first" you would tell him that it does not matter and cheating is wrong. This is no different.
exactly. You have got to take all feelings out of every situation. There were A LOT of racist politicians when slavery was abolished, but they knew slavery was wrong, even if they felt different.
When a crime is bad enough that you are willing to feel better by killing someone else, emotions run high, and people get put to death because of it. Judges and Juries alike get caught up in this. Prosecutors play on the emotions of juror for the sole reason that its the best way to get what you want.