Discussion of TCpete. SETTLED. ADVISE FIRST POST
#201
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
so if someone gets reported 3 times by 3 different people they get banned because they were not following the rules. When 50+ people give good rep of the one being banned should be also taken in consideration as well as when someone reports anyone!
50+>3 the equation can't get any simpler.
Plus if he has already said he is willing to control himself I'm pretty sure everyone that has signed the list is willing to help and watch out for him!
50+>3 the equation can't get any simpler.
Plus if he has already said he is willing to control himself I'm pretty sure everyone that has signed the list is willing to help and watch out for him!
#202
See what people have to realize is that tC Pete won't be here tomorrow, or maybe 3 days after tomorrow.
The mods need to get together and discuss whether or not he should be brought back (Which he should) but we have to let them chill and just keep expressing the good things that Pete has done for everyone which will overshadow the bad.
Sure he made fun of noobs...but they were douchebags, and it wasn't him it was a pack of guys that did it.
With everyone showing that he was a greater good than evil, he will be brought back, but cursing at Mods or making fun of anyone really doesn't help.
I hate kittens btw so hand me my free puppy
The mods need to get together and discuss whether or not he should be brought back (Which he should) but we have to let them chill and just keep expressing the good things that Pete has done for everyone which will overshadow the bad.
Sure he made fun of noobs...but they were douchebags, and it wasn't him it was a pack of guys that did it.
With everyone showing that he was a greater good than evil, he will be brought back, but cursing at Mods or making fun of anyone really doesn't help.
I hate kittens btw so hand me my free puppy
#203
He gets along with 15% of 1up
I can say what I want on this thread - maybe you should read the rules too
He has connections. Craigslist and eBay
I don't really care if they bring him back on board. I've learned to ignore his posts. 50 people signed this - about 0.005% of scionlife members. Congrats.
I can say what I want on this thread - maybe you should read the rules too
He has connections. Craigslist and eBay
I don't really care if they bring him back on board. I've learned to ignore his posts. 50 people signed this - about 0.005% of scionlife members. Congrats.
#204
Actually it's 0.08928571428571429% of all Scionlife members if my calculations are correct.
Theres probably i'd say 300 tops daily active posters however. So, the percentage is looking pretty good there.
Just saying.
Theres probably i'd say 300 tops daily active posters however. So, the percentage is looking pretty good there.
Just saying.
#205
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
and your 1 out of 50 in this thread thats dis-agreeing, which makes you .05% so congrats to you too.
im asking you politely to move on because you are not contributing anything positive to this thread.
im asking you politely to move on because you are not contributing anything positive to this thread.
#206
Originally Posted by jasonrs2
He gets along with 15% of 1up
I can say what I want on this thread - maybe you should read the rules too
He has connections. Craigslist and eBay
I don't really care if they bring him back on board. I've learned to ignore his posts. 50 people signed this - about 0.005% of scionlife members. Congrats.
I can say what I want on this thread - maybe you should read the rules too
He has connections. Craigslist and eBay
I don't really care if they bring him back on board. I've learned to ignore his posts. 50 people signed this - about 0.005% of scionlife members. Congrats.
Funny how you edited your post. I thought he walked out of 1up cause he couldn't stand all the sandy vagina syndrome that was attacking some of the members?
#207
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
checho is completely right.
thanks for understanding dude.
lets keep this on topic and going in the right direction, its done waaaay better than i thought it would have already.
thanks for understanding dude.
lets keep this on topic and going in the right direction, its done waaaay better than i thought it would have already.
#208
I had to edit cuz I'm on my cell phone. You're absolutely right checho. He walked away from 1up cuz of all the svs. They also took the word "gullible" out of the dictionary. Since hoodie asked politely, I'll stop posting on this thread as long as there are no future posts on here referring to me or anything I said. I have the right to defend my experiences.
#209
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
thank you, i appreciate it.
NO MORE POSTING ABOUT JASON GUYS.
he is indeed entitled to his opinion, and although many of us dont agree with it, it is his to state, so let him post it and move on.
NO MORE POSTING ABOUT JASON GUYS.
he is indeed entitled to his opinion, and although many of us dont agree with it, it is his to state, so let him post it and move on.
#210
1.) yellowxhoodie
2.) Elijahtc
3.) STNC
4.) rosedaleny806
5.) smilezdc
6.) BigJD
7.) brett561tc
8.)NYNCTC
9.)ippskidder
10.) kiss_kiss_kill
11.) ace83
12.) SoFloTC
13.) m6ar2cel6oTC
14.) caveman
15.) Ro_Ja
16.) BlkTC
17.)Cavalierkid888
18.)a_german_named_hans
19.) Checho10
20.)teamben158
21.)ScionizedRide
22.)DerK
23.)java09
24.)superwhitetc20
25.) jsingh
26.) toeveryhour
27.) bdis3
28.) Crayola_G
29.) xSTANDxSTRONGx, Brian
30.) aroddalobster
31.) DonNguyen
32.) Racersky
33.) FlintmicatC
34.) Infinitevisi0n
35.) Ricantc
36.) s2
37.) D1G1T4L
38.)Crippie
39.) bBlover
40.) 2006bluetc
41.) bkuhl
42.) CarbonXe
43.) XjoeyX
44.) chrischoi
45.) tC_insomniac
46.) JoeSchizo
47.) SCIONshane
48.) ScionJim23
49.) RCZDesigns
50.) ppiech2
51.) trdtcpr
52.)rrimportrtracer
53.)
2.) Elijahtc
3.) STNC
4.) rosedaleny806
5.) smilezdc
6.) BigJD
7.) brett561tc
8.)NYNCTC
9.)ippskidder
10.) kiss_kiss_kill
11.) ace83
12.) SoFloTC
13.) m6ar2cel6oTC
14.) caveman
15.) Ro_Ja
16.) BlkTC
17.)Cavalierkid888
18.)a_german_named_hans
19.) Checho10
20.)teamben158
21.)ScionizedRide
22.)DerK
23.)java09
24.)superwhitetc20
25.) jsingh
26.) toeveryhour
27.) bdis3
28.) Crayola_G
29.) xSTANDxSTRONGx, Brian
30.) aroddalobster
31.) DonNguyen
32.) Racersky
33.) FlintmicatC
34.) Infinitevisi0n
35.) Ricantc
36.) s2
37.) D1G1T4L
38.)Crippie
39.) bBlover
40.) 2006bluetc
41.) bkuhl
42.) CarbonXe
43.) XjoeyX
44.) chrischoi
45.) tC_insomniac
46.) JoeSchizo
47.) SCIONshane
48.) ScionJim23
49.) RCZDesigns
50.) ppiech2
51.) trdtcpr
52.)rrimportrtracer
53.)
#211
1.) yellowxhoodie
2.) Elijahtc
3.) STNC
4.) rosedaleny806
5.) smilezdc
6.) BigJD
7.) brett561tc
8.)NYNCTC
9.)ippskidder
10.) kiss_kiss_kill
11.) ace83
12.) SoFloTC
13.) m6ar2cel6oTC
14.) caveman
15.) Ro_Ja
16.) BlkTC
17.)Cavalierkid888
18.)a_german_named_hans
19.) Checho10
20.)teamben158
21.)ScionizedRide
22.)DerK
23.)java09
24.)superwhitetc20
25.) jsingh
26.) toeveryhour
27.) bdis3
28.) Crayola_G
29.) xSTANDxSTRONGx, Brian
30.) aroddalobster
31.) DonNguyen
32.) Racersky
33.) FlintmicatC
34.) Infinitevisi0n
35.) Ricantc
36.) s2
37.) D1G1T4L
38.)Crippie
39.) bBlover
40.) 2006bluetc
41.) bkuhl
42.) CarbonXe
43.) XjoeyX
44.) chrischoi
45.) tC_insomniac
46.) JoeSchizo
47.) SCIONshane
48.) ScionJim23
49.) RCZDesigns
50.) ppiech2
51.) trdtcpr
52.)rrimportrtracer
53.)Bravehearts
54.)
2.) Elijahtc
3.) STNC
4.) rosedaleny806
5.) smilezdc
6.) BigJD
7.) brett561tc
8.)NYNCTC
9.)ippskidder
10.) kiss_kiss_kill
11.) ace83
12.) SoFloTC
13.) m6ar2cel6oTC
14.) caveman
15.) Ro_Ja
16.) BlkTC
17.)Cavalierkid888
18.)a_german_named_hans
19.) Checho10
20.)teamben158
21.)ScionizedRide
22.)DerK
23.)java09
24.)superwhitetc20
25.) jsingh
26.) toeveryhour
27.) bdis3
28.) Crayola_G
29.) xSTANDxSTRONGx, Brian
30.) aroddalobster
31.) DonNguyen
32.) Racersky
33.) FlintmicatC
34.) Infinitevisi0n
35.) Ricantc
36.) s2
37.) D1G1T4L
38.)Crippie
39.) bBlover
40.) 2006bluetc
41.) bkuhl
42.) CarbonXe
43.) XjoeyX
44.) chrischoi
45.) tC_insomniac
46.) JoeSchizo
47.) SCIONshane
48.) ScionJim23
49.) RCZDesigns
50.) ppiech2
51.) trdtcpr
52.)rrimportrtracer
53.)Bravehearts
54.)
#212
#213
#215
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
i fully agree with 3 warnings and a ban, but when you are as active in the community as pete was...
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
im not saying that anyone is above anyone else or better than other ppl, or above the rules...
#216
Well, somebody a few pages back was asking where their free kitten was...
Quick comment on removing the "FREE Whoever" from sigs and locations. Those were put there specifically to be "in your face" to the mods. As such the very people you have to be on the good side of to get anything done you are actively annoying. Not smart.
Does that make sense? If not, say so. Maybe someone else can explain it better.
"You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar."
Quick comment on removing the "FREE Whoever" from sigs and locations. Those were put there specifically to be "in your face" to the mods. As such the very people you have to be on the good side of to get anything done you are actively annoying. Not smart.
Does that make sense? If not, say so. Maybe someone else can explain it better.
"You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar."
#217
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
no i dont think that all, normally when a celeb is busted it purely for a bad thing, DUI's, drugs, etc etc. and their is nothing good that outweighs or evens out the bad.
in this case the good clearly outweighs the bad and pete has agreed to change.
and Tomas...gee...thanks for helping me calm the riot.
in this case the good clearly outweighs the bad and pete has agreed to change.
and Tomas...gee...thanks for helping me calm the riot.
#219
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
yes thats what we are saying.
but some people on here are expressing themselves in the wrong way for this situation and choosing to say it in an entirely diff way which the mods are not to thrilled about.
but some people on here are expressing themselves in the wrong way for this situation and choosing to say it in an entirely diff way which the mods are not to thrilled about.
#220
More free kittens!!
As a primary supporter directly involved in the Free CoryJames situation, I can tell you that as soon as the support group understood that the Mods were serious about the request to remove the sigs and any other references to freeing/reinstating Cory, we did.
By sitting here and spouting off about why you should be able to post your support any way you want (against the wishes of the Mods), you are basically showing that you either don't care to understand the motivation of their requests, or refuse to listen to them. All this does is further their belief that you are unable to serve Pete in a constructive manner, so why should they reinstate him?
Don't get me wrong, I don't have any experience with Pete and have nothing against either him or any of you; I'm just trying to offer a little insight. As Tomas said, "You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar." So why not take the easy way out, and show the Mods that those of you who support Pete are willing to listen and work with them. You'll get a lot closer to your goal.
Congratulations yellowxhoodie, you've done a good job trying to keep it on topic, and I wish you the best in your efforts. Understanding, agreement and positive action amongst both members and Mods is the only hope that Pete and your cause have.
Sorry Tomas, didn't mean to jump into a thread that I may not belong in, but it's driving me crazy watching it spin in a circle.
As those who know me from the xB2 forum know, I'm just here to help.
As a primary supporter directly involved in the Free CoryJames situation, I can tell you that as soon as the support group understood that the Mods were serious about the request to remove the sigs and any other references to freeing/reinstating Cory, we did.
By sitting here and spouting off about why you should be able to post your support any way you want (against the wishes of the Mods), you are basically showing that you either don't care to understand the motivation of their requests, or refuse to listen to them. All this does is further their belief that you are unable to serve Pete in a constructive manner, so why should they reinstate him?
Don't get me wrong, I don't have any experience with Pete and have nothing against either him or any of you; I'm just trying to offer a little insight. As Tomas said, "You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar." So why not take the easy way out, and show the Mods that those of you who support Pete are willing to listen and work with them. You'll get a lot closer to your goal.
Congratulations yellowxhoodie, you've done a good job trying to keep it on topic, and I wish you the best in your efforts. Understanding, agreement and positive action amongst both members and Mods is the only hope that Pete and your cause have.
Sorry Tomas, didn't mean to jump into a thread that I may not belong in, but it's driving me crazy watching it spin in a circle.
As those who know me from the xB2 forum know, I'm just here to help.