steelers vs cards superbowl

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

02-02-2009, 02:24 AM

#21

dibbz

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: Back in the "grove"

Posts: 2,472

arizona WHO????
cards did almost get lucky tho!!
steelers pretty much dominated this one for sure!!!
congrats to the steelers...

02-02-2009, 02:25 AM

#22

SciontCya

Senior Member

Big Sky Scion
SL Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: six-two-six

Posts: 4,120

02-02-2009, 02:28 AM

#23

DaBlackBox

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Is steppin' his game up

Posts: 806

very disappointed in the final results

02-02-2009, 02:30 AM

#24

superwhiteTC20

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Cary, NC

Posts: 863

HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!!!

WOOOOOOO!!!!

02-02-2009, 02:38 AM

#25

burstaneurysm

Senior Member

Fail, INC
SL Member

Join Date: Oct 2006

Location: Forest Park, IL

Posts: 11,312

That was a pretty good game. 3rd quarter was kinda uneventful, but it certainly got intense in the last few minutes.

02-02-2009, 03:21 AM

#26

BlkTC

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 4,725

YAY STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!

02-02-2009, 03:43 AM

#27

Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226

Senior Member

Balliztik
SL Member

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Puyallup, Washington

Posts: 3,338

o baby go steelers!!!!!!

02-02-2009, 06:12 AM

#28

Hyghgynx

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2005

Location: I'm da BOOM King!!!

Posts: 5,103

Quote:

Originally Posted by SciontCya

x2!! What a game! The Cards did put up an awfully good fight though.

1st to six suckas!!!!

02-02-2009, 06:17 AM

#29

JOEinSD

Senior Member

AlphaSquad
SL Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: San Diego, CA

Posts: 3,703

Screw the Steelers!

At least the Cards covered with the spread.

Made some money tonight! Woot woot!

I loved it when my gf said to me, "Sorry you lost your bets, babe.."

I just smiled.

02-02-2009, 08:03 AM

#30

BlkTC

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 4,725

steelers actually lost.. but they can't change it now.. both of his feet weren't on the ground.. :[

02-02-2009, 08:09 AM

#31

JOEinSD

Senior Member

AlphaSquad
SL Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: San Diego, CA

Posts: 3,703

Although I wanted the Cards to win, I'd have to say that that TD was legit.. He did have his left foot down.

02-02-2009, 08:28 AM

#32

BlkTC

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 4,725

after the game, there was a replay somewhere in frame x frame footage that his feet weren't on the ground.. but they can't change it now... so eh.. YAY STEELERS!

02-02-2009, 12:18 PM

#33

TheMerovingian

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: NJ

Posts: 774

The steelers may have controlled most of the game but they couldn't get into the endzone until that last drive. BIG props to Arizona's D!!! Penalties killed it for them. Arizona should have won that game. They had the better offense and better defense but like I said, they gave it away on penalties.

02-03-2009, 02:41 AM

#34

Yanki01

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Posts: 8,776

only 1 foot was on the ground, the other was behind the other foot & not on the ground. Warner's "fumble" with less than 15secs left was an incomplete pass, his arm was going foward and they should of reviewed it at the least to do a double take. good game none the less, i wanted the Cowboys to win......i mean the Cardinals but oh well? i won $150

02-03-2009, 04:28 AM

#35

JOEinSD

Senior Member

AlphaSquad
SL Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: San Diego, CA

Posts: 3,703

I won $150 from actual betting an another $100 (technically $80 because I spent $20) from the pools.

I knew I should've put down $250 on that game..

02-03-2009, 09:18 AM

#36

BlkTC

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 4,725

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yanki01

i thought that they did review it as an incompletion.. also, doesn't both feet have to be on the ground for a touchdown?? or is there a new rule somewhere that only says you need 1 foot..?