JDM Toyota bB Released
#101
Originally Posted by rdclark
As a matter of fact, I'm basing my expectation on my experience with an '81 Tercel, which lasted 16 years with only routine maintenance, used much the same way we're using our xB. We've also gotten 14 years and 165,000 miles (so far) from a 91 Mazda MPV - the last 65k after giving it to my son. So I have some experience with the longevity of Japanese cars, and with handing them off to the next generation as well.
Also, I think that a society that considers a $15,000 machine that uses a ton of natural resources to make and many thousands of gallons of fuel to operate to be "disposable" has some real problems.
Finally, 2015 is ten years from now, not 20.
RichC
Also, I think that a society that considers a $15,000 machine that uses a ton of natural resources to make and many thousands of gallons of fuel to operate to be "disposable" has some real problems.
Finally, 2015 is ten years from now, not 20.
RichC
Yes, yes I know the xB is statistically more reliable than those European brands, my point is that a $14k Japanese econo box doesn't have the rugged build quality, paint, cloth and plastic quality to look good at that age. Sure, it may still run, but it wouldn't be anything I'd want to drive by then.
I agree that it's a shame to waste resources, but I take some solace in the fact that they use a fair amount of recycled and recyclable materials in modern cars. I was buying a car I intended to keep 10+ years at this point though, I'd be shopping for an early 1990 Mercedes, BMW or a Volvo 240 series.
#104
Originally Posted by Biznox
I agree that it's a shame to waste resources, but I take some solace in the fact that they use a fair amount of recycled and recyclable materials in modern cars. I was buying a car I intended to keep 10+ years at this point though, I'd be shopping for an early 1990 Mercedes, BMW or a Volvo 240 series.
small Toyota's will hold up a lot better than cars 4-5x more expensive, and that includes interior. In fact, harder plastics used in cheaper cars holds up a lot better than softer materials and leather used in luxury cars.
on to the bB, I think it looks awesome. Front is cool, back is pretty ugly when you see it first time, but you get used to it, but interior is AWESOME. By far the best interior design I have seen in small car, armrest music control looks cool as hell.
#105
I would say that the new bB design has lived up to the Scion branding. Scion was meant to be different, the whole concept was niche to begin with. How many mainstream people would drive a box? More than they figured, but it's not going to be a Civic or Corolla type seller...ever. When they debuted the little cars they caused quite a stir and from the comments on this thread, they've done the same with the new bB design.
Me personally, I like it. But the real question is, do I like it enough to buy it? No, but then again I didn't like the xB enough to buy it either, the xA was a little more to my "buy it" type liking. But you never know how it things work out in the future.
Oh and yes, Toyotas do run forever. Ok, so that's a bit overboard. But my 20 year old Corolla ran really well until just last year when the original engine finally died. Now it's got a new engine (well newer) and it's running fine again. Toyota's hold up very, very well with just standard maintenance, not a lot of other cars do. I'm not saying the can't just that on average Toyota's do very well. Even the rear seat headrest just got it's first tear only a few months ago.
Me personally, I like it. But the real question is, do I like it enough to buy it? No, but then again I didn't like the xB enough to buy it either, the xA was a little more to my "buy it" type liking. But you never know how it things work out in the future.
Oh and yes, Toyotas do run forever. Ok, so that's a bit overboard. But my 20 year old Corolla ran really well until just last year when the original engine finally died. Now it's got a new engine (well newer) and it's running fine again. Toyota's hold up very, very well with just standard maintenance, not a lot of other cars do. I'm not saying the can't just that on average Toyota's do very well. Even the rear seat headrest just got it's first tear only a few months ago.
#106
OK guys.
I guess I am just judging by all the other entry level Toyotas I've seen. Paseos and Tercels don't look so hot these days. It's not a criticism that you need to defend against, NO entry level car, with the exception of aircooled Volkswagens, stands up to the test of time.
Like I said, I'm sure they will still run, but when you have sheetmetal as thick as a piece of tracing paper, I'm sorry but it will have 10,000 little dents and the car will creak and rattle when it's 10+ years old. That's just a fact. Corners are cut to make a car for $14k or under it's not something you can deny.
I'm surprised to see what spywolf said, because the majority of older BMW's and Mercedes I've seen does not bear that out, sorry. Mercedes especially earlier models hold up extremely well. It's not uncommon to see a 1970s or 1980s Mercedes with a near perfect interior and no dents. How many 1970s and 1980s Camrys, Corollas and Tercels can you say that about? You do (at least you DID) get what you pay for.
Reliability is great, but I just don't love any econobox enough to want to drive it for 10+ years. The little shortcomings that come along with an economy car would just start to get on my nerves before then. The car has just barely adequate power now, what's it going to be like when it's lost compression and it's out of tune and making 89 hp instead of 103?
Say what you will, but these cars are meant to be disposable items, that is how it works in Japan. If you want a basic econo car that is built to last 20 years, buy an aircooled Volkswagen. The steel doesn't crinkle if you look at it wrong and it's solidly built like a tank.
I guess I am just judging by all the other entry level Toyotas I've seen. Paseos and Tercels don't look so hot these days. It's not a criticism that you need to defend against, NO entry level car, with the exception of aircooled Volkswagens, stands up to the test of time.
Like I said, I'm sure they will still run, but when you have sheetmetal as thick as a piece of tracing paper, I'm sorry but it will have 10,000 little dents and the car will creak and rattle when it's 10+ years old. That's just a fact. Corners are cut to make a car for $14k or under it's not something you can deny.
I'm surprised to see what spywolf said, because the majority of older BMW's and Mercedes I've seen does not bear that out, sorry. Mercedes especially earlier models hold up extremely well. It's not uncommon to see a 1970s or 1980s Mercedes with a near perfect interior and no dents. How many 1970s and 1980s Camrys, Corollas and Tercels can you say that about? You do (at least you DID) get what you pay for.
Reliability is great, but I just don't love any econobox enough to want to drive it for 10+ years. The little shortcomings that come along with an economy car would just start to get on my nerves before then. The car has just barely adequate power now, what's it going to be like when it's lost compression and it's out of tune and making 89 hp instead of 103?
Say what you will, but these cars are meant to be disposable items, that is how it works in Japan. If you want a basic econo car that is built to last 20 years, buy an aircooled Volkswagen. The steel doesn't crinkle if you look at it wrong and it's solidly built like a tank.
#108
Originally Posted by Biznox
Reliability is great, but I just don't love any econobox enough to want to drive it for 10+ years.
If I had sold my Tercel after only 10 years, I would have been selling a car in perfect operating condition with less than 100k miles on it, that cost next to nothing to maintain and run, that was cheap to insure and long-since paid for. For many people, that describes a better car than you can buy new.
RichC
#110
Originally Posted by rdclark
Originally Posted by Biznox
Reliability is great, but I just don't love any econobox enough to want to drive it for 10+ years.
If I had sold my Tercel after only 10 years, I would have been selling a car in perfect operating condition with less than 100k miles on it, that cost next to nothing to maintain and run, that was cheap to insure and long-since paid for. For many people, that describes a better car than you can buy new.
RichC
Kudos to you for keeping a cheap car that long and really getting your moneys worth out of it and being ecologically responsible.
The world needs more people like that.
#111
Originally Posted by mitchell
good god this design is a mess...
I can't believe somone was able to sell THIS in a meeting...if they release this I may sell my box just to avoid the association....
I can't believe somone was able to sell THIS in a meeting...if they release this I may sell my box just to avoid the association....
They basically did everything wrong that the first model avoided. Trying too hard to make the car "interesting" by going crazy mixing nonsensical lines and curves and stupid shapes in a random mess. Same thing that made the Element less classy than the xB.
The xB got it right and would have been hard to improve upon, except with small touches to modernize it a little.
This design is atrocious and represents the worst traits of stupid JDM design from the same school of though that spawns the FUGLY over the top bodykits with cowcatchers and non-functional intake scoops that lead nowhere.
I'd take a Porte over this thing any day.
#112
Originally Posted by Biznox
That's funny because every Tercel and Paseo I see looks like dogsh1t now with faded paint, a million dings and a raped interior. But there are exceptions to every rule. I'm sure if you baby it and treat it like it's precious it will hold up better.
Nevertheless, sometimes we see what we look for. Try looking for well-kept entry cars instead of junkers and you might be surprised by what you see.
RichC
#113
That's a good point. I think it's also fair to say that people are less likely to treat a Paseo or Tercel as nicely as they would a more valuable investment, that probably accounts for alot of the ragged looking cars I see.
Then again, my car is barely 2 years old and the rear door already has a cheap sounding rattle in it from being slammed too hard by someone ONE time and various parts of the interior plastics are showing wear and tear and I don't abuse my car at all. It's things like that that make it hard for me to beleive this car will look nice in 10 years. I'm not complaining though, it is what I expect from an economy car, nothing more, nothing less.
Then again, my car is barely 2 years old and the rear door already has a cheap sounding rattle in it from being slammed too hard by someone ONE time and various parts of the interior plastics are showing wear and tear and I don't abuse my car at all. It's things like that that make it hard for me to beleive this car will look nice in 10 years. I'm not complaining though, it is what I expect from an economy car, nothing more, nothing less.
#116
I may not be the 'usual' sort, but I wanted the xB before I even found out
who made it.
As I've said here before:
(It was obvious to me it was a "Tokyo City Car, but I didn't know who's.)
My first thought on seeing the 'new' bB that toyota just released was
"Mazda? Chrysler? Eweww!"
who made it.
As I've said here before:
The very first time I saw a brief glimpse of a Scion commercial on
TV - just an xB driving by and turning into an urban canyon - by
the time we channel switched back the commercial was over.
My comment to the other person watching with me was "I want
one! What is it?"
TV - just an xB driving by and turning into an urban canyon - by
the time we channel switched back the commercial was over.
My comment to the other person watching with me was "I want
one! What is it?"
My first thought on seeing the 'new' bB that toyota just released was
"Mazda? Chrysler? Eweww!"
#117
Re: 2007 Bb
Originally Posted by ahoahoman
Come on now, how many of you guys actually liked the Xb from the start? I'm sure there were some converts out there. You know when it hits our shores you'll be the first one in line to trade in that 2004-2006 Xb.
#119
Originally Posted by Biznox
Um... it looked exactly the same dude. Except for the grille and headlights it was pretty much identical, but I agree.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
airmankevin1
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
26
02-14-2018 01:23 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion iM Discussion Lounge
0
11-28-2014 11:10 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion News Forum
0
11-25-2014 03:00 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion iM Discussion Lounge
0
11-20-2014 05:20 PM