View Poll Results: Please choose an option
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll
Daytime Running Lights. Conclusion: Waste of Time
#21
Originally Posted by magyver
meh, for drl's? that was always the first thing i disabled in every car ive owned since 96. leave your parking lights on and put in some fogs/led's. i guess in a way im drl'n it by leaving my parking light switch on 24/7 but i have led fogs and its just for show.. if its dark, i turn on my lights.. so i vote #4
I also hate some of these newer domestic sedans that use their stupid parking lights as DRLs.
sorry, a pet peeve of mine
Originally Posted by _NeXuS_
High's at day wont glare
Originally Posted by Jehoo
Thanks for the input guys! So I'm leaning to trashing this project? :D
#22
I support you Jehoo :D.
Maybe they glare but it broad daylight your sight is being bombarded with light so highs wont bother in night when your not receiving any light High glare the heck out of you , DRL's since they are at 60% at day i wouldnt see it as an obstruction at day.
One time DRL's were really usefull i like it more for looks, one time ona trip across the dessert in the middle of the light cars from a certain distance were hard to see because of the blurr that heat creats from a distance you could actually identify cars that had DRL's runing.
Maybe they glare but it broad daylight your sight is being bombarded with light so highs wont bother in night when your not receiving any light High glare the heck out of you , DRL's since they are at 60% at day i wouldnt see it as an obstruction at day.
One time DRL's were really usefull i like it more for looks, one time ona trip across the dessert in the middle of the light cars from a certain distance were hard to see because of the blurr that heat creats from a distance you could actually identify cars that had DRL's runing.
#23
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South SoCal, California
Posts: 2,170
I'll give this thread until the weekend. If I have nothing to do on that day, I'll proceed with the project and make a write up. It's for those people who voted for option 3. I just couldn't let them down. :D
I like wasting my time...
I like wasting my time...
#24
Yea I gotcha Nexus. I agree, at 60% it probably wouldn't be a problem .
haha... and just watch the 2008 tC have DRL
Originally Posted by Jehoo
I'll give this thread until the weekend. If I have nothing to do on that day, I'll proceed with the project and make a write up. It's for those people who voted for option 3. I just couldn't let them down. :D
I like wasting my time...
I like wasting my time...
#25
Originally Posted by Jehoo
I'll give this thread until the weekend. If I have nothing to do on that day, I'll proceed with the project and make a write up. It's for those people who voted for option 3. I just couldn't let them down. :D
I like wasting my time...
I like wasting my time...
#27
Originally Posted by paul34
Originally Posted by magyver
meh, for drl's? that was always the first thing i disabled in every car ive owned since 96. leave your parking lights on and put in some fogs/led's. i guess in a way im drl'n it by leaving my parking light switch on 24/7 but i have led fogs and its just for show.. if its dark, i turn on my lights.. so i vote #4
I also hate some of these newer domestic sedans that use their stupid parking lights as DRLs.
i use them as i/everyone loves to stare at the LED fogs whether its day or night. and where i come from (hick town population 1K) everyone and there brother even 5-0, run w/ just their parking lights on. i love the look. as my led tails of course are on too..
its a preference thing. i like the white led SW tC combo thing.. but yeah.. to each their own
#28
Originally Posted by paul34
Yea I gotcha Nexus. I agree, at 60% it probably wouldn't be a problem .
haha... and just watch the 2008 tC have DRL
Originally Posted by Jehoo
I'll give this thread until the weekend. If I have nothing to do on that day, I'll proceed with the project and make a write up. It's for those people who voted for option 3. I just couldn't let them down. :D
I like wasting my time...
I like wasting my time...
#29
Originally Posted by Jehoo
I'll give this thread until the weekend. If I have nothing to do on that day, I'll proceed with the project and make a write up. It's for those people who voted for option 3. I just couldn't let them down. :D
I like wasting my time...
I like wasting my time...
#30
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South SoCal, California
Posts: 2,170
I was just thinking, do you guys really want option 3? That option would make the hi beams light up the whole time, day and night with the engine running. Wouldn't it be odd-looking if the hi beams are on like 40-50% of power at night together with the low beams? Just need to get an input on this matter. Because, I just can’t imagine how it would look.
#31
Originally Posted by Jehoo
I still need to find out if the tC has positive switching or negative switching for the circuit to work. I assumed the tC uses positive switching.
I was recently in communication with Doug Miles and Dave Gorden from Hamsar and they told me its a current sourcing system, it is neither neg or pos switched (most toyotas are negative trigger) ... and even if you got it to work there may be a problem in drl mode, if the high beams are turned on (eg in a "flash-to-pass situation") it may blow the fuse.
PM me if you want all the details from my convo's with them. I'd like to see this work so if I can be of any help let me know.
#33
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South SoCal, California
Posts: 2,170
So after reading this project's pros and cons, I decided not to do this project anymore. I am mainly concerned about the issue of glare and gas mileage. There are more cons than the pros of DRLs. Here are the websites that changed my mind:
http://www.nordicgroup.us/drl/
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/dearmfr/cd9402.pdf
So I guess I have to flush this project down the drain... I do apologize for those who voted "Yes" on this project. Just need to think about others before yourselves.
Peace.
EDIT: Maybe I'll just come up with something that will make the high beams light up only 5W like the parking lights but only at night.
http://www.nordicgroup.us/drl/
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/dearmfr/cd9402.pdf
DRLs, as currently implemented on cars sold in the U.S., have severe problems. These problems have been acknowledged by experts such as the NHTSA. Until these problems are corrected, either by legislation or by the automakers, the prudent thing to do is to disable your DRLs, if possible. Above all, you should research the facts about DRLs.
Peace.
EDIT: Maybe I'll just come up with something that will make the high beams light up only 5W like the parking lights but only at night.
#34
Too bad.
However, if you still wanna try and get that look maybe same 194 wedge bulbs retro'd into the highbeam housing would work. I've been toying with the idea for a while now, but am not quite sure how to make it work. It's the wiring part that mystifies me, as I could prob'ly figure out how to mount the sockets in there. Any ideas?
However, if you still wanna try and get that look maybe same 194 wedge bulbs retro'd into the highbeam housing would work. I've been toying with the idea for a while now, but am not quite sure how to make it work. It's the wiring part that mystifies me, as I could prob'ly figure out how to mount the sockets in there. Any ideas?
#37
Awww no DRL's the 194's on high beams socket would look really nice when you have your low beams on, like the Acura RSX's that have a 194's on their high beams and they light up the housing a little.
#38
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South SoCal, California
Posts: 2,170
I failed making my first module work.
I think the lighting system is current-triggered and not voltage-triggered. I'll still do revisions and will keep you guys posted.
I think the lighting system is current-triggered and not voltage-triggered. I'll still do revisions and will keep you guys posted.
#39
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Too bad.
However, if you still wanna try and get that look maybe same 194 wedge bulbs retro'd into the highbeam housing would work. I've been toying with the idea for a while now, but am not quite sure how to make it work. It's the wiring part that mystifies me, as I could prob'ly figure out how to mount the sockets in there. Any ideas?
However, if you still wanna try and get that look maybe same 194 wedge bulbs retro'd into the highbeam housing would work. I've been toying with the idea for a while now, but am not quite sure how to make it work. It's the wiring part that mystifies me, as I could prob'ly figure out how to mount the sockets in there. Any ideas?