All Motor 200 WHP
#41
honestly I think you might would be able to hit 200 whp with that setup. I am about to finish my setup of Injen CAI, Agency Power Pulley, Tsudo Header and Full 2.5" exhaust and will be getting to the dyno in the first of May. Now theres a vid on youtube of a Dude with an Injen CAI, Tsudo header, and PM exhaust that puts down 169whp and 167 tq. I'm expecting around 175 MAYBE 180 with full 2.5" exhaust and a pulley too. Now if you plan on running a similar setup with a stage 3 cam and the intake manifold and THEN tune it. I dont see why you couldn't make 25-30 whp from the cam, intake manifold and the tune when you have the exhaust and everything to support your other mods. The only thing I'm not sure about is your tuning device. But I dont really know very much about tuning either....but if you do all of what you were saying and have it tuned properly and successfully, I think you could see 200whp.
Also ppl wth? Cams aren't bolt on
I may retract everything I just said if i go to dyno and come up with much less. But based off of what I know now, I think you're good. Now do it and tell us the results!!!
Also ppl wth? Cams aren't bolt on
I may retract everything I just said if i go to dyno and come up with much less. But based off of what I know now, I think you're good. Now do it and tell us the results!!!
#46
Originally Posted by TCpete
on a mustang dyno which reads very very low
so figure an east 19X whp untuned... kthanxbye!
so figure an east 19X whp untuned... kthanxbye!
I just dont think the OP will with his setup
#47
not with his set up he wont.. i coulda done it with a nice tune and upgraded pipe.. the dyno above was on the stock mid pipe! lol.. so go figure how much more i coulda if i got a decent 2.5
#49
Originally Posted by TCpete
the dyno above was on the stock mid pipe! lol..
that's a nice slice of fail right there...
#50
LMAO ^^^ the throttle response i had when i had a 2.25 PIPING was obscured
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
#51
Originally Posted by TCpete
LMAO ^^^ the throttle response i had when i had a 2.25 PIPING was obscured
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
#53
same thing i was jus about to say. having a .25 of a difference in a exhaust isnt much of a difference on a NA car, so unexpectederror u fail for thinkin u know sumthing about NA and dynos?
when u go huge exhaust on a NA is pointless which is y almost all aftermarket exhausts are 2.25 (AP,Megan etc)
when u go huge exhaust on a NA is pointless which is y almost all aftermarket exhausts are 2.25 (AP,Megan etc)
#54
Originally Posted by unxpectederror
Originally Posted by TCpete
LMAO ^^^ the throttle response i had when i had a 2.25 PIPING was obscured
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
btw the stock piping is 2.375 in diameter which IMO was perfect for what i needed in terms of performance at WOT in both low and high RPM...
if you want to say thats a fail move fine for you... but the dynos and track times say my fail is a MTFW!
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Actually when I was at PTuning for the dyno-shootout, the N/A tC with the stock S-Pipe had the best outcome. Exhausts can be overdone.
but of course what the hell do i know
#55
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
I don't remember the combo, but it was header, stock s-pipe and some catback.
It was solid proof that changing the s-pipe will cause a loss in HP on an N/A tC with header/catback.
It was solid proof that changing the s-pipe will cause a loss in HP on an N/A tC with header/catback.
#57
man u know thats weird because i had i/h/e and spipe and for a few weeks while i was getting a bung welded onto my new spipe i rode around with the stock spipe and man that crap suckedddddd
when i popped on the invidia spipe again it was a new car completely...
i think the spipe does help.. atleast the invidia one... and when i had my mmw combo that was also nice.. but stock sucks on the spipe.. that crap is like a straw lol
when i popped on the invidia spipe again it was a new car completely...
i think the spipe does help.. atleast the invidia one... and when i had my mmw combo that was also nice.. but stock sucks on the spipe.. that crap is like a straw lol
#58
dont u still have the MMW?
yea from wat i remember reading fron jon awhile bak people with fullexhaust header back werent even doin that great and crazyedie with jus a header and axleback had the best dyno
yea from wat i remember reading fron jon awhile bak people with fullexhaust header back werent even doin that great and crazyedie with jus a header and axleback had the best dyno
#60
Originally Posted by rosedaleny806
dont u still have the MMW?
yea from wat i remember reading fron jon awhile bak people with fullexhaust header back werent even doin that great and crazyedie with jus a header and axleback had the best dyno
yea from wat i remember reading fron jon awhile bak people with fullexhaust header back werent even doin that great and crazyedie with jus a header and axleback had the best dyno
it was a nice change in low and middle end performance but lacked the top end from the MMW but im not complaining.. it was a good decision on my part.. the MMW was getting to problematic to deal with.