Dyno - Injen CAI/MMW Header/CC.Com Catback w/ res & cat
01-31-2006, 05:52 PM
#1
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,228
Dyno - Injen CAI/MMW Header/CC.Com Catback w/ res & cat
Best run was
74 Degrees
162.1HP
159.7TQ
Discuss (Finally another dyno :D )
Sorry about not taking any pictures. I left in a hurry so that I could make it to work on time. :\
No other engine mods. MMW damper = broken if anyone wants to say that "helped"
Also running on 18" Konig Unknowns with Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires. ALOT slower than my stockers :\ As a matter of fact, I think the damper broke b/c of that...stickier tires = rarely wheel spin unless super hard shifting. Anyway....
Once I get my pulleys & flywheel in....another dyno!
Anyway, discuss!!!
01-31-2006, 07:39 PM
#5
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Andersen AFB, Guam
Posts: 5,277
Re: Dyno - Injen CAI/MMW Header/CC.Com Catback w/ res &
Very nice numbers but I have to disagree somewhere:
Also running on 18" Konig Unknowns with Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires. ALOT slower than my stockers :\ As a matter of fact, I think the damper broke b/c of that...stickier tires = rarely wheel spin unless super hard shifting. Anyway....
Anyway, discuss!!!
I have the Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires just like you. And they deffinetly DO NOT have more stick than the stock tires. Wheel spin is rediculous with these tires. I wouldnt buy them again. Not trying to knock your words. But I personally am not happy with the tires me and you have.
Originally Posted by dp-_-
Also running on 18" Konig Unknowns with Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires. ALOT slower than my stockers :\ As a matter of fact, I think the damper broke b/c of that...stickier tires = rarely wheel spin unless super hard shifting. Anyway....
Anyway, discuss!!!
01-31-2006, 10:09 PM
#9
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,228
Originally Posted by Nick06tC
I need to check out a damner. Maybe it will help it out. I am sure my 200 hp isnt helping much with traction either...
1/4 Question:
No, I have yet to do that. I don't have much time to get on a track and the car is only about 4 months old so....
The 1/4 is one of my future goals >_<
02-01-2006, 04:23 AM
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lake Havasu
Posts: 27
same here I absolutly hate rasp! I have the TRD muffler too...BUT i ordered the MMW header/s-pipe anyways. I'm gonna do a resonator or 2, hope that takes care of it. if not i'll be kinda sad.
I ordered it cause I was getting sick of thinking about if i should do it, not do it, do it, not do it....so I did it....I'm also gonna get the supercharger so I wanted to free up more power..
I ordered it cause I was getting sick of thinking about if i should do it, not do it, do it, not do it....so I did it....I'm also gonna get the supercharger so I wanted to free up more power..
02-01-2006, 05:10 AM
#13
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Heart of Texas
Posts: 281
Re: Dyno - Injen CAI/MMW Header/CC.Com Catback w/ res &
Originally Posted by Nick06tC
Very nice numbers but I have to disagree somewhere:
Also running on 18" Konig Unknowns with Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires. ALOT slower than my stockers :\ As a matter of fact, I think the damper broke b/c of that...stickier tires = rarely wheel spin unless super hard shifting. Anyway....
Anyway, discuss!!!
I have the Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires just like you. And they deffinetly DO NOT have more stick than the stock tires. Wheel spin is rediculous with these tires. I wouldnt buy them again. Not trying to knock your words. But I personally am not happy with the tires me and you have.
Originally Posted by dp-_-
Also running on 18" Konig Unknowns with Kumho Ecsta 225/40 tires. ALOT slower than my stockers :\ As a matter of fact, I think the damper broke b/c of that...stickier tires = rarely wheel spin unless super hard shifting. Anyway....
Anyway, discuss!!!
Pattern Name Tire Size Type Dia DepthU.T.Q.G. Weight
ECSTA SPT 225/40R18 92Y BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 320/AA/A 23.6
ECSTA AST 225/40R18 92H BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 420 A/A
ECSTA ASX 225/40R18 92W BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 420 AA/A 23
ECSTA 711 225/40R18 88W BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 320/AA/A 22.5
ECSTA Supra 225/40R18 92Y BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 280/AA/A 22.8
ECSTA V70A 225/40R18 88W 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 6 50/AA/A 22.4
ECSTA MX 225/40R18 88Y BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 8.5 220/AA/A 21.9
ECSTA KH11 225/40R18 92W BSW 7.5 - 9.0 25.1 10 320/AA/A 19.9
02-01-2006, 05:14 AM
#14
Senior Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,947
idont wanna hi-jack ur thread or anything
but you got
162.1HP
159.7TQ
but i got
151.1HP
158.0TQ
on a 248C dynojet (www.RDDYNO.com) with only AW header... just wanted to know if you got a base dyno to compare your #'s to see if they are underrating your car. (they as in the dyno software)
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/aznski...9d.jpg&.src=ph
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
but you got
162.1HP
159.7TQ
but i got
151.1HP
158.0TQ
on a 248C dynojet (www.RDDYNO.com) with only AW header... just wanted to know if you got a base dyno to compare your #'s to see if they are underrating your car. (they as in the dyno software)
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/aznski...9d.jpg&.src=ph
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
02-01-2006, 02:12 PM
#16
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,167
Originally Posted by hahaitzskippy
idont wanna hi-jack ur thread or anything
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
Horsepower, while directly related to torque, isn't locked up in a direct ratio to displacement. By shifting the meat of that torque curve higher in the rev range (the most effective way of modding an NA motor) with cams/porting/valvetrain, we'll see the gap between torque and HP to continually increase. No matter, though, the HP figure is what matters.
02-01-2006, 02:58 PM
#17
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,228
Originally Posted by senseiturtle
Originally Posted by hahaitzskippy
idont wanna hi-jack ur thread or anything
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
referring to the TQ #... seems fishy
Horsepower, while directly related to torque, isn't locked up in a direct ratio to displacement. By shifting the meat of that torque curve higher in the rev range (the most effective way of modding an NA motor) with cams/porting/valvetrain, we'll see the gap between torque and HP to continually increase. No matter, though, the HP figure is what matters.
Sound clip (that doesn't really sound like this in person):
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...&highlight=com
02-01-2006, 08:36 PM
#19
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Heart of Texas
Posts: 281
[quote="Nick06tC"]I have the ecsta 712 supra. I dont see them listed up their
Tirerack.com has the surpa 712's ranked 14th of 43 types in the ultra high performance summer catergory. Clearly not the best, but better than most. With a front wheel drive your probably going to have to modulate the power from a stop regardless of what tire you use. Here's their top 5.
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KDW
Bridgestone Potenza RE750
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Avon Tech M500
Bridgestone Expedia S-01
Tirerack.com has the surpa 712's ranked 14th of 43 types in the ultra high performance summer catergory. Clearly not the best, but better than most. With a front wheel drive your probably going to have to modulate the power from a stop regardless of what tire you use. Here's their top 5.
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KDW
Bridgestone Potenza RE750
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Avon Tech M500
Bridgestone Expedia S-01
02-01-2006, 08:52 PM
#20
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,228
Originally Posted by hahaitzskippy
^^
nice thanks for the info
i recently put on an INTAKE and S-pipe.
imma go dyno again to see what comes up too
stay tuned
nice thanks for the info
i recently put on an INTAKE and S-pipe.
imma go dyno again to see what comes up too
stay tuned