Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Swapping engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2006 | 01:05 AM
  #1  
ahboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Default Swapping engines

Hey, I'm new to this site and I don't if anyone had ever posted this question before. I was wondering if anyone knows if its possible to swap out the 2az-fe motor and put in the 3sge motor from the Japanese Celica to the TC. Seeing how popular the 3sge engine is from the Altezza, MR2, and the Celica, I just thought maybe this engine would be better since there are more parts for that engine. I've seen people swap in the 3sge motor into a 93 FF Corolla before so that's why I'm asking if that would be good. Just a thought. If its not a good idea, can you tell me why. I really wanna know.
Old 10-29-2006 | 01:50 AM
  #2  
arbnpx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 559
Default

you want to step down from 2.4 L to 2.0 L?
Old 10-29-2006 | 01:57 AM
  #3  
toyotalife's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 199
From: Right outside NE Phila.
Default

i hope you were talkin bout swaping in the 3sgte not the 3sge........ the base engine would be a major power loss....
Old 10-29-2006 | 02:08 AM
  #4  
CuRiOuSfIsH's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,344
From: Queens, NY
Default

^^ really? I thought the latest 3SGE made ~200BHP on the Toyta Altezza.
Old 10-29-2006 | 03:17 AM
  #5  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Who says there isn't any market for the 2AZ? The only things I see we are lacking is Intake Manifold, Cams (exept for S/C) and some little things. There is a LOT of aftermarket for this engine.
Old 10-29-2006 | 03:20 AM
  #6  
Setiri's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 124
From: Houston
Default

CuriousFish, you may want to check the F/I area of these boards. People have really taken this motor to some extreme levels from what I've seen and I'm not exactly a big gearhead. I do know this engine can move you if that's what you're looking for. It's all about the money, knowledge, space and time.
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:09 AM
  #7  
ahboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Default

Firstly yeah, I do agree that stepping down from a 2.4L to a 2.0L seem odd. But with the 2az-fe pumping only 160 hp, I thought maybe the 2.0L 3sge could be better with 200 hp stock without superchargers or turbos. It might help you save some weight too, I could be wrong though. And soros151, don't get me wrong, I don't doubt or look down on the 2az-fe motor. I was just thinking since the 3sge had been around longer, that motor would probably have been a more popular 4 cylinder engine in toyota. That's why I think there are more mods for that engine. But if I wanted turbo 3sgte would be sweet with over 200 hp. I think I'm happy enough with the NA 3s engine. And also I just the engines would be better being a ge than an fe. What do you guys think?
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:10 AM
  #8  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

True, and as always has been said about swaps. With enough money, anything is possible. :D
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:12 AM
  #9  
Zebman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,616
From: West Virginia, US
Default

I'm still being lost at the part where a 2.0L is making 200WHP...
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:12 AM
  #10  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

200hp I think it is, at the crank.
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:14 AM
  #11  
Zebman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,616
From: West Virginia, US
Default

Originally Posted by soros151
200hp I think it is, at the crank.
Even then, the 2.4L 2AZ-FE makes 160 at the crank. Our cars average 130-140 to the wheels. Is it different compression ratios or something?
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:20 AM
  #12  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

Could be compression, higher revving, timing...blah blah blah.

RX7's are 1.3 litres and can make gobs of power...but thats an unfair comparison.
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:24 AM
  #13  
brian's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,905
From: Boston
Default

Originally Posted by farberio
Could be compression, higher revving, timing...blah blah blah.

RX7's are 1.3 litres and can make gobs of power...but thats an unfair comparison.
that's a wankel...wankels are in a whole different league
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:32 AM
  #14  
ahboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Zebman
Originally Posted by soros151
200hp I think it is, at the crank.
Even then, the 2.4L 2AZ-FE makes 160 at the crank. Our cars average 130-140 to the wheels. Is it different compression ratios or something?
If your talking about how a 2.0L makes more power than the 2.4L, then yeah the compression ratio on the 3sge is higher than the 2az-fe. The higher the compression ratio makes more airflow, I guess. More airflow means more power. But that wouldn't help save gas though.
Old 10-29-2006 | 07:41 AM
  #15  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Some of you guys need to study engines a little bit more. . . bigger doesn't always equal better. The original S2000 motor (2.0L) put out 240hp STOCK and N/A. They later upped the displacement to something like 2.2 and increased torque.

There are many reasons to swap out the 2AZ. . . is it a bad motor? No, it's a perfectly good motor!!!!! But it is definitely NOT the world's best motor. For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
Old 10-29-2006 | 04:38 PM
  #16  
06CStC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
And that is why our cars is 16k.
Old 10-29-2006 | 05:20 PM
  #17  
tc2nut4's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,509
Default

haha.... 2.4L and 160hp.... its definitely a dud outta the box....

but the potential is surprising
Old 10-30-2006 | 02:46 AM
  #18  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by 06CStC
Originally Posted by djct_watt
For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
And that is why our cars is 16k.
And that's why I bought one. I'm not bashing the car in any way, shape, or form.
Old 10-30-2006 | 02:59 AM
  #19  
eston's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 139
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tc2nut4
haha.... 2.4L and 160hp.... its definitely a dud outta the box....

but the potential is surprising
Call me a nut about overthinking about this earlier, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's why Toyota used the 2AZ in our cars as opposed to the 2ZZ-FE in the old Celica. The 2.4L is honestly rock solid for heavy amounts of boost and other extensive modifications, and the tC was built for the purpose of being modified.
Old 10-30-2006 | 04:14 AM
  #20  
Louie's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 191
From: queens, nyc
Default

Originally Posted by eston
Originally Posted by tc2nut4
haha.... 2.4L and 160hp.... its definitely a dud outta the box....

but the potential is surprising
Call me a nut about overthinking about this earlier, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's why Toyota used the 2AZ in our cars as opposed to the 2ZZ-FE in the old Celica. The 2.4L is honestly rock solid for heavy amounts of boost and other extensive modifications, and the tC was built for the purpose of being modified.
i think it's overall a thing toyota did to save money thus making our car the price it is. i think the camry engine was a cheaper choice and w/ the nice small tourque in the beginning it gave it a nice sporty feel.

imo, truthfulyl i don't think they intended it to be sucha heavilly modded engine, otherwise they woulda went w/ their higher revving engines...

but i can see the curiosity in wanting to swap ina 2sgte, kinda liek 240sx's w/ the want to go from a 2.4 litre engine to a turbo'ed 2.0 engine, the 2.0 has more aftermarket support thus making it a easier to tune engine.


Quick Reply: Swapping engines



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21 PM.