Swapping engines
#1
Swapping engines
Hey, I'm new to this site and I don't if anyone had ever posted this question before. I was wondering if anyone knows if its possible to swap out the 2az-fe motor and put in the 3sge motor from the Japanese Celica to the TC. Seeing how popular the 3sge engine is from the Altezza, MR2, and the Celica, I just thought maybe this engine would be better since there are more parts for that engine. I've seen people swap in the 3sge motor into a 93 FF Corolla before so that's why I'm asking if that would be good. Just a thought. If its not a good idea, can you tell me why. I really wanna know.
#5
Who says there isn't any market for the 2AZ? The only things I see we are lacking is Intake Manifold, Cams (exept for S/C) and some little things. There is a LOT of aftermarket for this engine.
#6
CuriousFish, you may want to check the F/I area of these boards. People have really taken this motor to some extreme levels from what I've seen and I'm not exactly a big gearhead. I do know this engine can move you if that's what you're looking for. It's all about the money, knowledge, space and time.
#7
Firstly yeah, I do agree that stepping down from a 2.4L to a 2.0L seem odd. But with the 2az-fe pumping only 160 hp, I thought maybe the 2.0L 3sge could be better with 200 hp stock without superchargers or turbos. It might help you save some weight too, I could be wrong though. And soros151, don't get me wrong, I don't doubt or look down on the 2az-fe motor. I was just thinking since the 3sge had been around longer, that motor would probably have been a more popular 4 cylinder engine in toyota. That's why I think there are more mods for that engine. But if I wanted turbo 3sgte would be sweet with over 200 hp. I think I'm happy enough with the NA 3s engine. And also I just the engines would be better being a ge than an fe. What do you guys think?
#11
Originally Posted by soros151
200hp I think it is, at the crank.
#13
Originally Posted by farberio
Could be compression, higher revving, timing...blah blah blah.
RX7's are 1.3 litres and can make gobs of power...but thats an unfair comparison.
RX7's are 1.3 litres and can make gobs of power...but thats an unfair comparison.
#14
Originally Posted by Zebman
Originally Posted by soros151
200hp I think it is, at the crank.
#15
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Some of you guys need to study engines a little bit more. . . bigger doesn't always equal better. The original S2000 motor (2.0L) put out 240hp STOCK and N/A. They later upped the displacement to something like 2.2 and increased torque.
There are many reasons to swap out the 2AZ. . . is it a bad motor? No, it's a perfectly good motor!!!!! But it is definitely NOT the world's best motor. For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
There are many reasons to swap out the 2AZ. . . is it a bad motor? No, it's a perfectly good motor!!!!! But it is definitely NOT the world's best motor. For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
#18
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Originally Posted by 06CStC
Originally Posted by djct_watt
For a whopping 2.4L, it's not exactly class leading in power output.
#19
Originally Posted by tc2nut4
haha.... 2.4L and 160hp.... its definitely a dud outta the box....
but the potential is surprising
but the potential is surprising
#20
Originally Posted by eston
Originally Posted by tc2nut4
haha.... 2.4L and 160hp.... its definitely a dud outta the box....
but the potential is surprising
but the potential is surprising
imo, truthfulyl i don't think they intended it to be sucha heavilly modded engine, otherwise they woulda went w/ their higher revving engines...
but i can see the curiosity in wanting to swap ina 2sgte, kinda liek 240sx's w/ the want to go from a 2.4 litre engine to a turbo'ed 2.0 engine, the 2.0 has more aftermarket support thus making it a easier to tune engine.