tC stands for Timing Chain.. ... or at least hoping it's a..
#41
I have yet to hear of a truly non-interference engine. Show me.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
#42
Re: i have a headache now hehe
Originally Posted by 2eZee
Originally Posted by sciontc_mich
Thank you for contacting Scion.
The tC engine is an interference design.
The tC engine is an interference design.
well, at least its a chain, but LAMENESS on the engine destruct design.
now we get to wonder which person on this thread is giving the CORreCt info.
bah
#43
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
I have yet to hear of a truly non-interference engine. Show me.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
#44
What no one has ever mentioned in this thread is how retarted it would sound to name a car the "Scion Timing Chain"
Next, it will be the Saturn "Electronic EGR Valve" , or the "Chevy Oil Pump", or even the "Toyota PCV Valve"
Not making fun of the original poster... it just hit me how funny that sounded.
Next, it will be the Saturn "Electronic EGR Valve" , or the "Chevy Oil Pump", or even the "Toyota PCV Valve"
Not making fun of the original poster... it just hit me how funny that sounded.
#45
Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
I have yet to hear of a truly non-interference engine. Show me.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
#46
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
I have yet to hear of a truly non-interference engine. Show me.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
#47
Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
I have yet to hear of a truly non-interference engine. Show me.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
Nothing wrong with belts, you just have to maintain them and replace them when you're supposed to. Just like tires or oil, if you don't, you will have problems.
#48
Originally Posted by The Rupp
Originally Posted by simplespirit
Anything with the vg33 V6 has a belt. This includes Frontiers and Xterras as well as a lot of Pathfinders and Quests.
its 3.3 liters, i own a frontier.
#49
The ones mentioned are ohc. I dont have specific year models, but most year models of the ones listed were non-interference if I recall correctly. I know the 1997 escort version of the 2.0 was actually interference, but the rest are non-interference. The 2.3L that was used in the mustang until they went v6 was also non-interference, as were the 2.3s in the ford rangers. As I mentioned before, OHC does not mean interference or non-interference. The same engine in different forms can be one or the other depending on the head design. But a non-interference engine is not exactly a rare thing. Toyota, GM and many other companies I am sure have made both interference and non-interference engines. I believe your car is interference in design. I'm not trying to get into an in depth argument. Just passing along info. But for now I am going outside to have some rum.
#51
The ones I listed are. I am sure there are plenty of others if I looked around. Those are just ones I was more familiar with. Like I said, I have seen the 2.3L break a few times without any damage, all 4 at highway speeds. They tended to break around 5k past the reccomended service interval.. the manufacturer really allowed for some design overhead on that one huh If ford says replace at 50k... do it, they dont leave much room for error!
#53
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
Just as some people thought your Scion engine was non-interference until someone emailed Toyota.
Like I said, not going offtopic or starting an argument, I just haven't found one yet.
Like I said, not going offtopic or starting an argument, I just haven't found one yet.
#54
Originally Posted by turbo2liter
Just as some people thought your Scion engine was non-interference until someone emailed Toyota.
Like I said, not going offtopic or starting an argument, I just haven't found one yet.
Like I said, not going offtopic or starting an argument, I just haven't found one yet.
Oh, engifineer, belts can make more power than chains. No timing scatter because the cams are not being jerked back and forth with every power pulse on the crank. If your distributor is cam driven (as many are) it also reduces ignition timing scatter. Both of these things mean you can make more power with a belt than you can with a chain or gears. It isn't always true, F1 are using chains these days, but I bet it's for a different reasons, and their stuff is pretty bizarre anyway. I can't remember the last time I saw a street engine with a 20k rpm redline.
#55
As far as the cams.. there can be a tiny difference in power with the belt... I have not seen huge differences in the numbers. But a chain setup is typically better for a performance engine in every case I have seen. They are more durable and can withstand more punishment over time than a belt. At least with the setups I have seen.
As far as the distributor that is true.. but you wont be finding a distributor in many cars these days Our cars run a fully electronic ignition with a solid state ignition module.
As far as the distributor that is true.. but you wont be finding a distributor in many cars these days Our cars run a fully electronic ignition with a solid state ignition module.
#56
Hopefully we won't be seeing cams much longer either. International already has over-the-road trucks running camless engines. It's only a matter of time now until we have ideal cam timing at all loads and rpm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rosskoss
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power
2
07-27-2006 06:08 PM
06, chain, engine, engines, interference, interfetance, motors, mustangs, noninterference, replace, scion, tc, timing, toyota, vq35de