Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

61mm tc versus 2004 R1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:09 AM
  #81  
m6ar2cel6oTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,888
From: Miami
Default

whats q16? and what dyno was it?
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:22 AM
  #82  
mospeedtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,899
From: R-VILLE, MD
Default

q16 I pretty sure is race fuel
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:45 AM
  #83  
m6ar2cel6oTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,888
From: Miami
Default

isnt Q16 better then c16?
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:46 AM
  #84  
mospeedtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,899
From: R-VILLE, MD
Default

Not sure but nothing google cant solve LOL
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:51 AM
  #85  
m6ar2cel6oTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,888
From: Miami
Default

thats where i found out at lol. q16 is is rated around 120 octane lol and c16 117 octane i found on google.
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:54 AM
  #86  
tofast4u's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 199
Default

[QUOTE=m6ar2cel6oTC;3296434]isnt Q16 better then c16?[/QUOT


Much better. It requires 3/5% more fuel over c16 but makes 5-8% more power !!!!
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:55 AM
  #87  
B_Real45's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,603
From: South Florida
Default

Q16 is more oxygenated.. provides for better/more consistent combustion.
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:58 AM
  #88  
Go4shoped's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 429
From: Florida
Default

my bad. one of my "friends" got on my account and tried to get me banned on like 3 forums

Last edited by Go4shoped; 09-14-2009 at 03:34 AM.
Old 09-14-2009 | 01:23 AM
  #89  
m6ar2cel6oTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,888
From: Miami
Default

ok loser! take care of that.
Old 09-14-2009 | 02:18 AM
  #90  
mospeedtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,899
From: R-VILLE, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Go4shoped
i have herpes
google can help cure that also.....


watching for bike vid.... On a side note I have a friend with a vette in disbelief LOL
Old 09-14-2009 | 02:23 AM
  #91  
draxcaliber's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,141
From: Maryland
Default

trd lsd will help with traction at all power levels. but you can still overwhelm the tires even when you're N/A. but when boosted, yeah, you can use all the help you can get.
Old 09-14-2009 | 02:57 AM
  #92  
tofast4u's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 199
Default

Here is the dyno graphs guys, Notice one I get the tune and timing perfect and my new spring as it couldnt hold boost, it will make a NICE flat power curve that doesnt drop off as you can see.

the reason for the dip as you can see on teh spread sheet of the #'s at each RPM(we made 527.6 @ 5790 RPM then fell off some then went back up to 527.9 @ 6831.. But the tune is very good and very soft, it needs timing past 6800, and boost not to tumble because of the small spring.. I will install the big blue and red tom.

first graph is 23 psi,2nd is 18.7 psi. the dynomite is the same as a dyno dynamics in terms of power level reading. if this were dyno jet, expect to see 6-9 % more power.. for example a z06 only made 437 on this dyno.. they usually make around 465-470 on a dyno jet,

Name:  010.jpg
Views: 14
Size:  67.8 KB
Name:  009.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  74.9 KB
Name:  007.jpg
Views: 19
Size:  48.1 KB
Old 09-14-2009 | 03:03 AM
  #93  
B_Real45's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,603
From: South Florida
Default

Why is there also a drop-off on the 18psi pull? It looks like your .63 A/R is choking up there. Shouldn't you be making power through to your 8200rpm redline? I'd definitely suggest a .82 A/R housing - assuming we're still talking about a T3 exhaust housing.. because i'm familar with .58 AR on a T4 footing.. but not on a T3.
Old 09-14-2009 | 05:08 AM
  #94  
m6ar2cel6oTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,888
From: Miami
Default

X2 on what b_real said. Bigger back housing if your reving that high you gotta be at a 8200. I wonder what you top out at with 8200 redline lol
Old 09-14-2009 | 05:15 AM
  #95  
tofast4u's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by B_Real45
Why is there also a drop-off on the 18psi pull? It looks like your .63 A/R is choking up there. Shouldn't you be making power through to your 8200rpm redline? I'd definitely suggest a .82 A/R housing - assuming we're still talking about a T3 exhaust housing.. because i'm familar with .58 AR on a T4 footing.. but not on a T3.

the .63 a/r is in fact not to small, by any means, The tune was for the old 61 journal bearing with .58 ar. The tune is now much different, and as you can recall I switched the turbo 1 night ago, I had to scale the map from a few logs, and it was much different. I didnt have time with work and other projects to tune it fully yet(working on that now). I added extra fuel all the way across from 6700 up, it was a much BIGGER increase at lower boost level (afr's were in the 10's past 6500-6600.. timing was 15.0 degrees all the way across with VVT control OFF. I have done some logging and tuning tonight, and maped my timing up a few degrees from 6500 up, and also got the AFR's very close to my 11.7 range on q16. I

as you can see, in the lower boost run the power fell off more, but at the end of the dyno it started to pull back up, I can show you the log, boost at the begining of the run@ 5500 RPM was 18.7 psi, and by 6500 dropped to 16 psi then by 7000 down to 14.3 psi. simple as that. the AEM tru boost works best with a larger Wastegate spring, its very inconsistant at lower boost settings, even on the 61mm, as far as the 1st graph the power didnt drop off any at all hardly, and the tune was very rich(not so much as the 18 psi run) and timing was still a flat 15.0 across the board on that engine load level of 23 psi from 4500-7600. if the exhaust housing was restrictive for my setup then it would fall off even worse with higher boost pressure. As you can see the power is not going to go up and then down and then back up without it being tune related, in this case which it was. Ill prove my point next week with 30 psi on the LITTLE SMALL(lol) .63 , I should have left my 1 bar spring in, I was able to hit 29.5 psi on the 61. I would have been able to hit at least 27 on the 67. but next week, I have a big blue (13 psi) and a small blue (8.7 psi) I am installing as we speak.

The guys that run .82's lets compare dyno #'s and then compare power under the curve.. you will NEVER need an .82 UNLESS you are striclty drag racing spooling with a 75-100 shot, and turning 8500, I ve done this for al long time and had alot of turbo cars. I m also a large distributor for comp turbo..

My .63 on the 2.4 is going to be good for my 8000 redline I am going to keep for now, It will make power almost right to redline after the tune is correct, It takes alot of good time to get them perfect.

BTW, I bumped my RPM down to 7600 on these runs as you can see as the tune was not corrected past these points to my liking, and I sure as HELL am not using O2 feedback for 23 psi lol

BTW she drives this car alot for a DD if its not raining or bad weather, pretty cool if you ask me. I have some nice vids and pics Ill post in a bit, the car has 19" HRE's

Hope this helps

Last edited by tofast4u; 09-14-2009 at 05:20 AM.
Old 09-14-2009 | 06:32 AM
  #96  
SoFloTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,104
Default

glad to know that about the .63
Old 09-14-2009 | 07:13 AM
  #97  
youngflyer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,277
From: Germantown, MD
Default

did i miss something or is there still no vid of racing the r1. not saying you didnt, im just very interested to see the vid!
Old 09-14-2009 | 07:55 AM
  #98  
tofast4u's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by youngflyer
did i miss something or is there still no vid of racing the r1. not saying you didnt, im just very interested to see the vid!

Like I said earlier, we were going to race on sunday (tonight) after the dyno to get a GOOD HD vid with someone in the car to take the vid, but my wastegate spring falls off at 23 compared to my 61mm setup I could run 29.5, so we are going to do it after I put both my springs back in tomm. The origional vid is a cell phone vid, and I want side by side running vid, I hate a vid of a race coming toward you. I can post that if you really want it, but be patient my good man..lol.. trust me, Ill have the vid of a 600 and the r1 for you to see..

I myself have a zx14 with a direct port 75 shot and a 7 inch over arm, and all your basics like pc3 airshifter and stuff. also have a 07 zx10. I dont want to race my own.. well the 10 anyway.. 14 would kill the TC
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:05 PM
  #99  
B_Real45's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,603
From: South Florida
Default

tofast4u

Thanks for clarifying on why you're with a .63.. but just for me - can you clarify if you're on a T4 exhaust housing or a T3. I don't know of any .58 AR T3 housings.. so going from a T4 .58 AR housing to a T3 .63 is a very different change. As you know, since you've been dealing with turbos a long time, you can't compare A/R from a T4 to a T3.. the radius from the turbo's centerline will be larger on a T4.
Old 09-14-2009 | 12:45 PM
  #100  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

The dyno sheets I've seen of an .82 do not fall at redline. I thought the car was fully setup. Did not realize you were still doing things. So, what was the dyno run for, just to show numbers? Was it just base runs? Just wondering why you didn't go ahead and take the time to tune it right and install whatever wg springs in, as you did the dyno runs.


Quick Reply: 61mm tc versus 2004 R1



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 PM.