Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

adjustable fuel psi regulator need some pointers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2009, 04:03 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
garynkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 236
Default adjustable fuel psi regulator need some pointers

hey guys wanna know which fuel pressure regulator is every1 running on? im lookin at the fuel lab 1 and aem 1.. are they all the same?? thanks
garynkim is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 04:46 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gingles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,881
Default

i bought the same one dezod offers from ebay....the aeromotive one....alot of people run this and no problems
gingles is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DezodDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 782
Default

This one works well.

http://www.dezod.com/pd_aeromotive_a...regulator-.cfm
DezodDon is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

im installing my fuel lab today with my fuel return setup
Ace83 is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
ElevationTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,156
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
im installing my fuel lab today with my fuel return setup

Ptuning setup?
ElevationTC is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 06:37 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

^^ yes.. I was gonna wait for that swirl pot i need a return setup so bad lol.. the system looks so great, taking pics right now before going into the car lol
Ace83 is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 07:39 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gingles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,881
Default

so whats the deal with the swirl pot? wtf is it?
gingles is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 07:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
ElevationTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,156
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
^^ yes.. I was gonna wait for that swirl pot i need a return setup so bad lol.. the system looks so great, taking pics right now before going into the car lol

Nice, Its such a thought out setup! the little bypass almost looks to nice to install!
ElevationTC is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 01:31 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
johnhawkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,100
Default

With a return setup do you just weld the OEM pressure regulater closed or is there a plug for it?
johnhawkins is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 06:00 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gingles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,881
Default

i just took mine completely out....not sure why everyone is going through the trouble of plugging it
gingles is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:47 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DezodDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 782
Default

It depends on how the kit is designed.

P-tuning uses a plug because they modify the sending unit as little as possible. Instead of giving you an improved feed line they have you cut the stock plastic line off the feed fitting from the sending unit, re-use the sending unit fitting and hose clamp a braided line onto the fitting you removed from the stock line ( i do not think this is safe, that is my opinion i would feel much better with an AN fitting) and then plug the regulator port so that you can use the feed solely as a feed line. Then you run the return into the sending unit and use the original feel line as your return line.

The only issues I have with doing something like this is that you don't actually get a full bolt on kit. If you ever want to return to stock or have to for some reason (ie state inspection, selling the car, trading in) you would have to go buy a new line from the dealer to fix the problem.

Another issue is using the stock feed port to supply fuel to the upgraded kit. The size of the feed on the stock sending unit is .2110" inner diameter which is roughly 7/32" allowed for the feed. You would see improvements if you used a -6an feed which is .375" or 3/8" continuous. The benefits of this would be less strain on the fuel pump which means less amperage draw and overall more output from your in tank fuel pump. Taking this attention to detail often times makes needing a second fuel pump unnecessary. If you upgraded the fuel feed side you would have to add a fuel filter inline but that is easy and what most people do anyhow. The stock fuel filter is super restrictive and with good cause as it was designed to flow enough fuel to make 200 hp. The factory fuel filter is located inside the sending unit and is not replaceable. I think this is stupid because if that filter plugs up you have to replace a $250 sending unit as opposed to a $12 dollar filter.


Originally Posted by gingles
i just took mine completely out....not sure why everyone is going through the trouble of plugging it
Not to mention if you look at where the FPR goes in the sending unit you will notice a passage to the filter media. That O ring on the stock sending unit prevents fuel from bypassing out of that cavity. The pump fills that cavity where the fuel filter resides before it leaves the sending unit. By removing the stock FPR completely you are allowing pumped fuel to bleed back to the tank. If it were that easy do you think that P tuning would have taken the time to make a plug?

The only way you can get around removing the plug completely is if you do not use the stock fuel filter and instead use a hose to connect directly from the fuel pump to the feed fitting you would have to add.

I have designed a sending unit that utilizes this and thus does not require a fuel plug. Any other way would cause problems. Maybe not something you would see at lower boost but higher boost for sure in the way of fuel starvation.

These statements are not meant to be antagonistic in any way shape or form. This is factual data, minus my opinions. Please take it as such.

Last edited by DezodDon; 12-21-2009 at 04:01 PM.
DezodDon is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 04:26 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

I think the ptuning fuel return that is out right now would be enough for most boosted tc right now.. I just installed mine and it did wonders. My 550 cc injectors are static at 6 psi on E85 and right after I installed the fuel return system with fuel pressure only set at 50psi my WOT afrs are now 8 to 10s what used to be 12.5-13 when i was on the stock system.
Ace83 is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 04:40 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DezodDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 782
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
I think the ptuning fuel return that is out right now would be enough for most boosted tc right now..
Yeah understandable but there was a time when people said that about our turbo kit. Now everyone wants the overkill. So in turn we must design over kill
DezodDon is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 04:53 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

lol yeah i know what you mean. You do have a point on that tiny stock sender fitting, that maybe something they might change with their bigger fuel system w/ dual pumps.. BTW Is dezod coming up with fuel system too?
Ace83 is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 05:03 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DezodDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 782
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
lol yeah i know what you mean. You do have a point on that tiny stock sender fitting, that maybe something they might change with their bigger fuel system w/ dual pumps.. BTW Is dezod coming up with fuel system too?
DezodDon is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 06:42 PM
  #16  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scionetics
KAD
SL Member
 
paul_dezod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 11,936
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
BTW Is dezod coming up with fuel system too?



paul_dezod is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 09:19 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gingles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,881
Default

Originally Posted by DezodDon
It depends on how the kit is designed.
Not to mention if you look at where the FPR goes in the sending unit you will notice a passage to the filter media. That O ring on the stock sending unit prevents fuel from bypassing out of that cavity. The pump fills that cavity where the fuel filter resides before it leaves the sending unit. By removing the stock FPR completely you are allowing pumped fuel to bleed back to the tank. If it were that easy do you think that P tuning would have taken the time to make a plug?

The only way you can get around removing the plug completely is if you do not use the stock fuel filter and instead use a hose to connect directly from the fuel pump to the feed fitting you would have to add.

I have designed a sending unit that utilizes this and thus does not require a fuel plug. Any other way would cause problems. Maybe not something you would see at lower boost but higher boost for sure in the way of fuel starvation.

These statements are not meant to be antagonistic in any way shape or form. This is factual data, minus my opinions. Please take it as such.

would it have helped that i put my return line to dump into the cavity where the sending unit sits? i basically just drilled out the top of where the stock fpr was and ran my return line there......perhaps this is why my car runs lean when i turn a corner to sharp.....or maybe its because i broke the wire leading to my power steering pump
gingles is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 09:23 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
garynkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 236
Default

ok right now im trying to do the same set up on the afpr and return line setup as yahama.. i cant tell if he drill out 2 holes for his set up on the fuel assembly.. any1 have some advice? thanks
garynkim is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 10:57 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

with the ptuning return, you only drill one hole just for the return coz it uses the stock sender for the feed.. I will be posting pics when i finally get my day off lol
Ace83 is offline  
Old 12-22-2009, 02:57 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DezodDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 782
Default

Originally Posted by gingles
would it have helped that i put my return line to dump into the cavity where the sending unit sits? i basically just drilled out the top of where the stock fpr was and ran my return line there......perhaps this is why my car runs lean when i turn a corner to sharp.....or maybe its because i broke the wire leading to my power steering pump
Using the stock feed path as your return path is no problem. The problem here is that if you look at he bottom of your sending unit you will see what I am talking about. Remove your sending unit and look where the FPR used to plug in you will see an opening the crescent shaped cavity that contains the fuel filter. This should not be open now if you are using an aftermarket FPR. This should still be plugged.

The only time you can totally remove the stock FPR is when you connect a hose straight from the pump to the outlet of the sending unit and use an aftermarket fuel filter such as an aeromotive or fuel lab or whatever you get the point.

The way the stock system and the p tuning system work they still make use of the restrictive fuel filter that is built in to the sending unit which is why they need to have either the FPR or the FPR plug in it's place. Follow the path from where the pump plugs in stock to where it exits stock.

Why would breaking the wire going to your power steering pump cause you to go lean? The only thing that does is increase your idle when you turn the steering wheel to full lock to accommodate for the additional load of the excess pressure in the system. This helps prevent stalling.

Last edited by DezodDon; 12-22-2009 at 03:05 PM.
DezodDon is offline  


Quick Reply: adjustable fuel psi regulator need some pointers



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 PM.