Ball Bearing Turbo
#4
ball bearing turbos are great for a couple reasons...
1. the ball bearings help reduce spool up time due to less friction of the shaft.
2. also, they cost a good amount more; so, you will be faster because less money in your wallet = less weight.
1. the ball bearings help reduce spool up time due to less friction of the shaft.
2. also, they cost a good amount more; so, you will be faster because less money in your wallet = less weight.
#9
Originally Posted by corpan32
does the turbonetics come with a ball bearing turbo?
More info on that: http://www.turboneticsinc.com/turbo_ceramicbb.htm
#11
That's funny......
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers. The verdict on this is still out....
Do you guys agree on this??
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers. The verdict on this is still out....
Do you guys agree on this??
#12
At the speeds that the turbo's turbine spins, I wouldn't doubt that is the case. I hadn't thought of that before. I can see now how it wouldn't really spin while touching the shaft. The oil would form a thin layer similar to ball bearings as long as the turbine was weighted perfectly. Nice catch.
#13
#14
Senior Member
OhioScions
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 836
Originally Posted by ERIC-TC
Anyone have a quick table showing basic information of the turbo kits currently on the market for the TC.
Betcha feel silly now that I found this for ya
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=104171
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by sleepermod
That's funny......
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers.
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers.
Today there are many applications of ball bearing turbos in stock vehicles. Many OE diesel engines have them with Caterpillar leading the way there. Skyline GTR's also had ball bearing units on them stock along with a ceramic turbine wheel (awesome).
Real world results whether on the dyno or on the street is significant. A ball bearing turbo will deliver more air, quicker to the engine than a conventional turbo will. The faster you can deliver boost to the engine the more exhuast gas energy will be exiting the cylinder head - the more boost you will deliver - the more exhaust gas energy etc. etc. What you will find is that a broader range of power will show up on the dyno throughout the rpm range and on the street this translates to faster spoolup=faster car. In racing applications it is even more important because on a pro drag racing tree, it is crucial to make boost at the line in 5/10ths of a second when second bulb gets lit. Same goes for road racing when inbeween shifts and braking where faster spoolup means quicker exit speeds from the corners.
In a standard floating bronze bushing turbo the floating bearings actually rotates at 1/3 the speed that the shaft is rotating at. The oil that gets placed onto the floating bushing actually does not stay a film for more than a fraction of a second. The floating bushings have oil holes drilled in them for lubrication purposes and these holes whip the oil into a frothy mess. The oil becomes extremely aerated while trying to escape the bearing housing. That is why oil drainage is so important to a turbochargers life. The oil must turn back into a movable liquid to drain down to the pan.
Ball bearing turbos do cost more but you are paying for technology. Think of it this way. Standard floating bushing turbo = cd walkman. Ball bearing units = iPod. CD's are great but in every day use the iPod blows it away. Technology is fantastic, take advantage of it whenver you can.
#16
Originally Posted by turbot2
Originally Posted by sleepermod
That's funny......
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers.
I remembered an article I read in one of the aftermarket turbo mags/internet forums that auto engineers had done a full-out study and test involving both bearing and non-bearings compressor units and displaced any evidence that ball-bearing turbos actually spun faster because there was less friction.... They stated that there was minimum contact as the shaft would have been suspended on a "layer" of lubricant oil as rotational spin velocity increased. They had claimed that ball-bearing turbos 1st made by IHI (Mitsubishi) was just a brand new marketing plot to earn $$$$ from consumers.
Today there are many applications of ball bearing turbos in stock vehicles. Many OE diesel engines have them with Caterpillar leading the way there. Skyline GTR's also had ball bearing units on them stock along with a ceramic turbine wheel (awesome).
Real world results whether on the dyno or on the street is significant. A ball bearing turbo will deliver more air, quicker to the engine than a conventional turbo will. The faster you can deliver boost to the engine the more exhuast gas energy will be exiting the cylinder head - the more boost you will deliver - the more exhaust gas energy etc. etc. What you will find is that a broader range of power will show up on the dyno throughout the rpm range and on the street this translates to faster spoolup=faster car. In racing applications it is even more important because on a pro drag racing tree, it is crucial to make boost at the line in 5/10ths of a second when second bulb gets lit. Same goes for road racing when inbeween shifts and braking where faster spoolup means quicker exit speeds from the corners.
In a standard floating bronze bushing turbo the floating bearings actually rotates at 1/3 the speed that the shaft is rotating at. The oil that gets placed onto the floating bushing actually does not stay a film for more than a fraction of a second. The floating bushings have oil holes drilled in them for lubrication purposes and these holes whip the oil into a frothy mess. The oil becomes extremely aerated while trying to escape the bearing housing. That is why oil drainage is so important to a turbochargers life. The oil must turn back into a movable liquid to drain down to the pan.
Ball bearing turbos do cost more but you are paying for technology. Think of it this way. Standard floating bushing turbo = cd walkman. Ball bearing units = iPod. CD's are great but in every day use the iPod blows it away. Technology is fantastic, take advantage of it whenver you can.
#17
Hhmmmm.... Informative writeup I must say, but I still have my reservations on the ball bearing vs thrust roller debate.
I do agree on the ceramic alloy compressor housing fabrication technology being in some high performance cars though.. they retain heat well and this means a more efficient turbine spin.
Porsche has their own PCCB (Porsche Composite Ceramic Brakes) system which is revolutionary and lasts the lifetime on the car! BUT of course, its pricey $$$$ Hi-tech means Hi-price
I do agree on the ceramic alloy compressor housing fabrication technology being in some high performance cars though.. they retain heat well and this means a more efficient turbine spin.
Porsche has their own PCCB (Porsche Composite Ceramic Brakes) system which is revolutionary and lasts the lifetime on the car! BUT of course, its pricey $$$$ Hi-tech means Hi-price
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
What reservations do you have? Anything specific?
The ceramic turbine wheels used were not for heat retention purposes though, they were used because ceramic materials are 1/2 the weight of GMR or Inconel steel that is normally used in exhaust turbine wheels. Lower inertia mass means faster response and better power.
The ceramic turbine wheels used were not for heat retention purposes though, they were used because ceramic materials are 1/2 the weight of GMR or Inconel steel that is normally used in exhaust turbine wheels. Lower inertia mass means faster response and better power.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xa007xa
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
0
03-29-2015 10:37 PM
fur_pig
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power
7
12-05-2014 12:48 PM
projectscion
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
0
03-13-2004 05:46 PM
stankubrick
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Wheel & Tire
8
10-16-2003 10:38 AM