Dyno Videos Zpi Stage 1 10 PSI
#22
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Originally Posted by pollup
Originally Posted by peteyd
:D greatest thing I ever did too! see peteyd saga pt 4 for update!
#24
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
Posts: 1,290
Originally Posted by leekeestc
i would like to see that car in action. plan on going to the track with it.
#25
I have another question. If 10 psi is reaching in the 300's both tq and hp. What trap speeds in a 1/4 mile will that get?
I was doing a little comparing between the tc and the type s, and it seems the tc is putting better numbers down esp tq, on lower, or same psi and I was a little confused.
I know type s are 2.0 and tc are 2.4, but does it mean that the Tc's take less pounds of boost since slightly larger engine and can produce more.
Sorry if this is a little offtopic, but if someone can clear me up.
I was doing a little comparing between the tc and the type s, and it seems the tc is putting better numbers down esp tq, on lower, or same psi and I was a little confused.
I know type s are 2.0 and tc are 2.4, but does it mean that the Tc's take less pounds of boost since slightly larger engine and can produce more.
Sorry if this is a little offtopic, but if someone can clear me up.
#26
Displacement does make a difference, but in the case of the TypeS and the tC, it'll be hard to notice, even with FI. To give you a comparison, a stock motor K20A2 (02-04 TypeS) on a stock Greddy 5psi kit will put down approx. 240whp untuned. 7psi is about 280whp untuned, and 9psi will have you at 300whp untuned. So displacement doesn't have much when we're talking imports unless there is a huge displacement difference from 2.0L to 3.2L or something.
As a TypeS own, I will def give props to this ZPI kit producing the numbers that it is. TQ are definitely envious as Hondas are known to not have very good TQ output. A TypeS putting down 300whp will be in 220TQ range. Stock for stock, the tC has a better lower end than the TypeS. But top end, that's another story
As a TypeS own, I will def give props to this ZPI kit producing the numbers that it is. TQ are definitely envious as Hondas are known to not have very good TQ output. A TypeS putting down 300whp will be in 220TQ range. Stock for stock, the tC has a better lower end than the TypeS. But top end, that's another story
#28
Originally Posted by itzjere
Displacement does make a difference, but in the case of the TypeS and the tC, it'll be hard to notice, even with FI. To give you a comparison, a stock motor K20A2 (02-04 TypeS) on a stock Greddy 5psi kit will put down approx. 240whp untuned. 7psi is about 280whp untuned, and 9psi will have you at 300whp untuned. So displacement doesn't have much when we're talking imports unless there is a huge displacement difference from 2.0L to 3.2L or something.
As a TypeS own, I will def give props to this ZPI kit producing the numbers that it is. TQ are definitely envious as Hondas are known to not have very good TQ output. A TypeS putting down 300whp will be in 220TQ range. Stock for stock, the tC has a better lower end than the TypeS. But top end, that's another story
As a TypeS own, I will def give props to this ZPI kit producing the numbers that it is. TQ are definitely envious as Hondas are known to not have very good TQ output. A TypeS putting down 300whp will be in 220TQ range. Stock for stock, the tC has a better lower end than the TypeS. But top end, that's another story
To add to that just food for thought,
Type S has 40 More HP stock to start with over the tC. Yet, we can achieve the same hp levels on a lower PSI.
#29
Yes, that is correct. Stock TypeS is rated at 200hp, and when dyno'd, comes to around 160-165whp. I believe the tCs are around 140whp?
Not to bash or start a war (as a Scion owner myself, I have much respect), but peak HP numbers play a very small part in a car. It all comes down to how the HP/TQ curves are setup to maximize power. It's all in the tune. Never the less, very impressive and glad to see how the tC has progressed.
Not to bash or start a war (as a Scion owner myself, I have much respect), but peak HP numbers play a very small part in a car. It all comes down to how the HP/TQ curves are setup to maximize power. It's all in the tune. Never the less, very impressive and glad to see how the tC has progressed.
#34
Sorry, I don't follow the tC FI section.. let alone this forum that much anymore (someone PM'd me for my input since I drove a TypeS), could you maybe point me to where I could learn more about ZPI powered?
Hence the reason we are ZPI Powered.
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by itzjere
It all comes down to how the HP/TQ curves are setup to maximize power. It's all in the tune.
Hence the reason we are ZPI Powered.
#35
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
Posts: 1,290
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Pollup, where are you.....LOL. This IS your thread you know.
#36
Do you know what year/body style your buddy's Camero is? The weight varies a lot depending on year. You're right however that tC is around 2900. Sounds like your buddy has a V6 Camero, not V8
#37
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
Posts: 1,290
Originally Posted by itzjere
Do you know what year/body style your buddy's Camero is? The weight varies a lot depending on year. You're right however that tC is around 2900. Maybe your buddy is a bad driver?
#39
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
Posts: 1,290
Originally Posted by itzjere
That's weird that you were able to keep up with him. Maybe he wasn't really racing you?