Fastest/most powerful 2AZ tC to date?
10-28-2008, 02:11 PM
#21
Originally Posted by Crayola_G
there was an aem tuned tC doing 10s with a trap well over 140mph, there is a thread on this site somewhere on that car, theres a youtube video as well. ill try and find it
http://itsmyscion.com/Imagehandler.a...fefa99d59e89c6
10-28-2008, 03:56 PM
#26
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 951
Originally Posted by CDogbert
Originally Posted by turdbrains
Since it's theoretically possible to achieve 1200-1300whp with a 2400cc engine. (At least that's what my uncle told me.)
I know the comparison only loosely applies... but the regulation size for V8 engines this year in Formula 1 is 2.4L, and none of them make that kind of power.
http://www.research-racing.de/bmwturbo.htm
10-28-2008, 04:30 PM
#29
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 541
Originally Posted by CDogbert
Originally Posted by turdbrains
Since it's theoretically possible to achieve 1200-1300whp with a 2400cc engine. (At least that's what my uncle told me.)
I know the comparison only loosely applies... but the regulation size for V8 engines this year in Formula 1 is 2.4L, and none of them make that kind of power.
I don't know about 1300whp but I do know that EVOs are making 1000whp on 2.0 engines.
10-28-2008, 05:31 PM
#31
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
pretty much anything over 300HP on a FWD car is pointless.
sure you could get slicks for the track and everything but its still just gonna spin and spin if your pushing high numbers.
sure you could get slicks for the track and everything but its still just gonna spin and spin if your pushing high numbers.
10-28-2008, 06:49 PM
#33
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LOWLOW Chicago
Posts: 13,746
its called ____ing money into the wind when you could just sell the FWD car and buy a RWD car and make it just as fast for 1/2 the money.
im not saying im all against it, im just saying its not the smartest idea.
im not saying im all against it, im just saying its not the smartest idea.
Enthusiast.
10-28-2008, 06:58 PM
#36
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 3,773
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
pretty much anything over 300HP on a FWD car is pointless.
sure you could get slicks for the track and everything but its still just gonna spin and spin if your pushing high numbers.
sure you could get slicks for the track and everything but its still just gonna spin and spin if your pushing high numbers.
10-28-2008, 07:01 PM
#37
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
My friend had a high 200-low 300whp SRT4 and he decided it was a complete waste to try to get more. Sold it and got an Evo. Now he's at 380whp and never came close to breaking the tires loose.
10-28-2008, 07:06 PM
#39
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 3,773
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
My friend had a high 200-low 300whp SRT4 and he decided it was a complete waste to try to get more. Sold it and got an Evo.