Finally got a decent time with my greddy turbo tc
10-09-2007, 02:26 AM
#1
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
Posts: 159
Finally got a decent time with my greddy turbo tc
Well i finally ran a 13,871@103.37 with a 2.26 60ft and then backed it up with a 13.929@104.09 and a 2.505 60ft hopefully ill have a little more power and some slicks. ill post the scans of the slips some time this week and just so everyone knows this is 10psi on the greddy kit
10-10-2007, 04:44 AM
#9
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
Posts: 159
Id say alot has to do with the driver and track conditions i find u never run what u think you should and the only way to know is to go and practice. besides there is nothing better the putting a car you built down the track its fun as all hell. and yes street tires they are falken azenisis rt-615 i think there a good street tire but there no bf drag radials.
10-10-2007, 10:35 AM
#11
Member
SL Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 83
Yea I know I gotta practice. But I'm guessing on my street tires (which are bald Dunlops on 18" chrome rims) would still give me at least a 14 sec flat time. I have faith lol. I'm also auto so I don't have to worry about missing or changing a gear @ the right time. My car bounces off rev limiter for about 2 seconds in 3rd going into fourth so that's gonna mess me up a little too. But seeing how well my car has performed in the streets I'm sure I have a high 13 second car with the setup I have.
I just have to get to the track before they close!!!!!
I just have to get to the track before they close!!!!!
10-14-2007, 08:21 PM
#13
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 121
I dont see how CDP only ran 13.9 with 271whp...is he a manual? cuz krdshrk ran 14.2 with 221whp..but he had slicks and hes an auto...but still...damn...you would think like low 13's. But i suppose he will run around there with some slicks O_o
10-14-2007, 10:15 PM
#14
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Originally Posted by PureToxin
I dont see how CDP only ran 13.9 with 271whp...is he a manual? cuz krdshrk ran 14.2 with 221whp..but he had slicks and hes an auto...but still...damn...you would think like low 13's. But i suppose he will run around there with some slicks O_o
Correct me if I'm wrong, but krdshrk was on DR's not slicks. And people should NEVER pay attention to whp #'s and drag times. Dyno #'s are for tuning and bragging rights. You could put down 271 on one dyno, and 210 on another.
10-15-2007, 04:58 AM
#15
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 441
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by PureToxin
I dont see how CDP only ran 13.9 with 271whp...is he a manual? cuz krdshrk ran 14.2 with 221whp..but he had slicks and hes an auto...but still...damn...you would think like low 13's. But i suppose he will run around there with some slicks O_o
Correct me if I'm wrong, but krdshrk was on DR's not slicks. And people should NEVER pay attention to whp #'s and drag times. Dyno #'s are for tuning and bragging rights.
Code:
You could put down 271 on one dyno, and 210 on another.
10-15-2007, 05:13 AM
#16
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: VEGAS BABY!
Posts: 9,061
You could be on a high rated dyno at sea level, and then on a lower rated dyno up in the mountains in colorado. Or one of the dynos may not be properly maintained. I think the point is valid. But I think on average, you can see a 40-50whp difference, which is still very signivicant.
10-15-2007, 08:00 AM
#17
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 209
not bad times man. i have the greddy kit also. mine has only been tuned as far as a/f ratio to 9lbs. it still has a lot more power to be brought out of it but for now on 18" rims with dunlop street tires and the stock clutch i ran a 13.701@101.1 with a 2.15 60'.
i did not take out any of my interior and still had the sub in the back. so if you just go down and practice you should be able to get better times. when i was on my nitto neo gens my car ran a 13.8 with a 2.26 60'@106. the more you spin off the line the slower your time will be but the higher your mph will be. the better your 60' is the better your time will be but the slower your trap speed will be.
i did not take out any of my interior and still had the sub in the back. so if you just go down and practice you should be able to get better times. when i was on my nitto neo gens my car ran a 13.8 with a 2.26 60'@106. the more you spin off the line the slower your time will be but the higher your mph will be. the better your 60' is the better your time will be but the slower your trap speed will be.
10-15-2007, 12:56 PM
#18
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Originally Posted by bruceg
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by PureToxin
I dont see how CDP only ran 13.9 with 271whp...is he a manual? cuz krdshrk ran 14.2 with 221whp..but he had slicks and hes an auto...but still...damn...you would think like low 13's. But i suppose he will run around there with some slicks O_o
Correct me if I'm wrong, but krdshrk was on DR's not slicks. And people should NEVER pay attention to whp #'s and drag times. Dyno #'s are for tuning and bragging rights.
Code:
You could put down 271 on one dyno, and 210 on another.
40-50whp difference like Mr. Meaty said. It's that drastic. Point is, power is pointless with out the rest of the gear to get it to the ground.
10-15-2007, 04:48 PM
#20
Very good run, our cars are darn hard to launch, my last pas was a 13.8xx with a 2.69 60' @ 108mph hahaha. I do not even want to post the 330 as I was spinning past it 
Once she finally hooked, it was the sickness I am also running rt615's... decent tire but definitly no slick.
Once she finally hooked, it was the sickness I am also running rt615's... decent tire but definitly no slick.