Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Guess my WHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010, 02:22 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

12 to 14? It's from 11 to 11.8 lol. Plus there is NO smoothing factor at all. That on a dynojet or dynapack would be a straight line.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:26 PM
  #62  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
cburglb34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,893
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
12 to 14? It's from 11 to 11.8 lol. Plus there is NO smoothing factor at all. That on a dynojet or dynapack would be a straight line.
opps yea its around 11-11.8 your afr werent very consistant.. hmm, and btw toan told me that their map sensor buffers..
cburglb34 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:28 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Ace83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 11,117
Default

Am i reading it wrong? I thought the bold line is boost and broken line are afrs..
Ace83 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:29 PM
  #64  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
cburglb34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,893
Default

under closer evaluation now i see why the afr has its leaner moments....its cuz that when your boost was going down
cburglb34 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:30 PM
  #65  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
cburglb34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,893
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
Am i reading it wrong? I thought the bold line is boost and broken line are afrs..

you read it right...i take it u read my post before i edited it lol
cburglb34 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:37 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

The AFR is consistent, it's staying between 11.7-12 the whole time. The only time it strayed from that, is when it jumped to 12.5 during turbo spool. 12:1 is what I wanted.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:40 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
Am i reading it wrong? I thought the bold line is boost and broken line are afrs..
That's right, but you're looking at the wrong sides of the chart. Top line = Left side. Bottom line = Right side. It says up top PSI and AFR.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:47 PM
  #68  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
cburglb34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,893
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
The AFR is consistent, it's staying between 11.7-12 the whole time. The only time it strayed from that, is when it jumped to 12.5 during turbo spool. 12:1 is what I wanted.


yea ui had an ich that u wanted 12's ....im aiming for 11.5-11.8 im **** for saftey
cburglb34 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:53 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

12:1 isn't far off from 11.8 lol. Besides, 12.5 straight across the board would have been a safe AFR, as long as you control the EGTs with timing.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:57 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mattTc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 627
Default

DO you guys think that a electronic boost controller is better than a manual? Ive turned down the idea of a manual controller because people have made it seem unreliable. I really would like to have the option of running two different PSI levels so it would be nice to be able to adjust the boost in cabin
mattTc is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:59 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

I was running a manual boost controller, and when it was set to 11.5 PSI, the most it jumped to was low 12's. When i had it set to 12psi, it jumped to 13 a couple times. If you're going to run an electronic boost controller, plan on getting a dual solenoid setup.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 03:24 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

Originally Posted by cburglb34
i would take creep over spikes anyday...u can tune for creep much easier than spikes as spikes are erratic

I completely disagree. A spike is normal in most BC setups. The normality is 1-2 PSI over what you have it set to. In my case, set to 12lbs of boost, and on the initial hit, it would hit 13 and fall back down to 12.

Creep on the other hand will exceed that 1-2 PSI over what your boost was set to. I would not rather have creeping issues well over the PSI threshold vs a minimal 1-2 PSI over that last all of a fraction of a second.
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 03:25 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mattTc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 627
Default

Is the manual BC a pain to change the boost or is it pretty strait foward?
mattTc is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 03:29 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

Originally Posted by mattTc
Is the manual BC a pain to change the boost or is it pretty strait foward?

You turn a ****. Can't be much more straight forward than that....
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 03:36 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mattTc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 627
Default

Lol alright, It would be nice to have some crazy advanced electronic boost controller where I can boost by gears and all that fun stuff but I think I may just be a MBC and take the money saved and put it to a high quality clutch/flywheel
mattTc is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 04:03 PM
  #76  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
cburglb34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,893
Default

boost by gear is over rated.. our cars have no traction wheter it be on 3psi or on 12
cburglb34 is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 04:37 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mattTc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 627
Default

Originally Posted by cburglb34
boost by gear is over rated.. our cars have no traction wheter it be on 3psi or on 12
Haha yeah, thats very true
Next car is deff not going to be FWD
mattTc is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 05:13 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
SoFloTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,104
Default

matt check ur pms
SoFloTC is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 05:23 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Default

Originally Posted by mattTc
Haha yeah, thats very true
Next car is deff not going to be FWD
Hitting peak boost in first gear = teh awesome.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 02-18-2010, 05:29 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mattTc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 627
Default

Yeah im thinking S2k for next car, or if i make it big, brand new M3...sex
mattTc is offline  


Quick Reply: Guess my WHP



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM.