Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Injector response time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009 | 09:38 AM
  #21  
ScionFred's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Okay, after more wasted hours of my life I can state that FIC inj response time is not the additional lag time of aftermarket inj's over stock lag time. What needs to be entered here is a value between stock inj response time and new inj response time. E.g; if stock inj's had .7ms lag time and new inj's have 1.2ms lag time, FIC IRT should be somewhere between .7 and 1.2ms, according to AEM.

You can tune around this in the fuel map, as most seem to do, but if you get this right at the start of tuning, it could mean less fuel map tweaking.
Old 11-20-2009 | 03:57 PM
  #22  
crush02342002's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,271
From: Houston, TX
Default

its never wasted if you learned something!
Old 11-20-2009 | 04:05 PM
  #23  
ElevationTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,156
From: Orlando, FL
Default

on the aem base map for the 1960 box they use 769.5 for the oem injectors...
Old 11-20-2009 | 05:10 PM
  #24  
ScionFred's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Originally Posted by crush02342002
its never wasted if you learned something!
I'm just frustrated about all the time I've been spending on this mis-wired Boomslang harness, FIC bugginess and a little ticked that AEM phone support told me IRT should be just the diff between oe and new inj's. Then on their forum I find AEM saying IRT should be somewhere between oe and new inj's.

Originally Posted by ElevationTC
on the aem base map for the 1960 box they use 769.5 for the oem injectors...
That's great info! Deatschwerks told me my 440cc lag time was 1270us at 13v and 1000us seems to be working for me. I also have a base map from Dezod and they used 1100us, presumably with 550cc.

Edit: Now I don't know who to believe. I tried going the other way (405us) and it seems to run and idle much better. OTOH, it might just be the ECU adapting to the new setup. I wish AEM would provide clearer instructions for FIC installation and tuning. One AEM tech says one thing and the next one contradicts him. The tech I spoke with today suggested that Scions don't benefit at all from resistors on the crk/cam signals and told me I should remove mine.

Last edited by ScionFred; 11-21-2009 at 01:25 AM.
Old 04-29-2010 | 05:18 PM
  #25  
ericsully's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Default

There is a free response time monitoring tool that would be useful
Old 04-30-2010 | 09:27 AM
  #26  
ScionFred's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Thanks! LOL
Old 05-07-2010 | 12:09 PM
  #27  
bdyer666's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 290
From: FORT WAYNE, IN
Default

anyone runnin the dezod 850s yet im currently tuning on them and ive got my response time set on .98 ms this is with the apr but gettin a good ltft of-.07 cruise and idle has stft of like +28 just wonderin if anyone has gottin some close numbers on these with the apr u adjust from 6v to 15v
Old 05-07-2010 | 12:57 PM
  #28  
ScionFred's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Can't you get the IRT and battery offset data from Dezod? If they don't have it, RC should. I got mine by emailing Deatschwerks.
Old 05-07-2010 | 01:39 PM
  #29  
crush02342002's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,271
From: Houston, TX
Default

im running the 850cc injectors as well...cant tell you trims cause im tuning open loop right now (aka no primary o2). after 50,000 miles, two turbo kits, and quite a bit of tuning it finally died on me.
Old 05-07-2010 | 06:46 PM
  #30  
DezodDon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 782
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

ruh roh shaggy

What happened?
Old 05-07-2010 | 10:21 PM
  #31  
DeatschWerks's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 123
From: Oklahoma City
Default

If you ever have any fuel related questions, our injectors or not, feel free to shoot me a PM or email. I check SL everyday even though I'm not posting.

Chris
Old 05-07-2010 | 11:18 PM
  #32  
crush02342002's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,271
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by DezodDon
ruh roh shaggy

What happened?
o2 died
Old 05-08-2010 | 05:34 PM
  #33  
bdyer666's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 290
From: FORT WAYNE, IN
Default

poopy there pretty pricey i get 30% discount through my shop and i still gulped a lil buyin a new one cause toyota thought it was necessary to strip the thing when they assembled the car
Old 07-06-2015 | 05:08 PM
  #34  
bbsciontc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 866
From: NJ
Default

I'm bringing this up from the dead based on some research I've been doing on the AEM FIC. The injector response time seems to have the opposite effect than one would expect from what I'm reading.

Normally, I would have thought that you would increase this time if you are using larger injectors that generally take longer to open than stock, the thought being that it would add that additional pulse width to the injectors. However, it seems that instead this is being used for the FIC to determine the length of the injector pulse from the factor ECU to "ignore" before determining the percentage in increase or decrease the pulse width.

For instance, lets say the factory pulse width at a given load/rpm is 1ms, and you entered a IRT of .400ms. The FIC would subtract the .400 out, resulting in an "injector open" pulse width of .600ms. The fuel correction would then only be applied to this portion, so a -50% correction would pull out .300ms, yielding a total pulse length of 0.700ms (.3ms remaining after correction + the .4ms added back from the IRT).

Is my thinking correct?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Col168c
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Drivetrain & Power
9
01-07-2016 07:55 AM
my06tc
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
10
06-25-2015 01:18 AM
Col168c
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Suspension & Handling
7
01-08-2015 07:30 PM
eric_m
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
79
03-17-2013 01:21 AM
Scionic
Maintenance & Car Care
39
07-20-2004 03:46 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 AM.