A little disappointed with the TC engine..
#61
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
Not trying to flame you, but you should check your facts before you post.
#62
Originally Posted by ProshopXB
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
Not trying to flame you, but you should check your facts before you post.
My friend with the SRT-4 told me his car is faster then the police pursuit cars. I'm like year right
#63
Originally Posted by cessblood
Originally Posted by ProshopXB
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
Not trying to flame you, but you should check your facts before you post.
My friend with the SRT-4 told me his car is faster then the police pursuit cars. I'm like year right
Back on topic.. Peteyd were is that head for testing.
#64
Originally Posted by ProshopXB
Originally Posted by cessblood
Originally Posted by ProshopXB
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
Not trying to flame you, but you should check your facts before you post.
My friend with the SRT-4 told me his car is faster then the police pursuit cars. I'm like year right
Back on topic.. Peteyd were is that head for testing.
Ok I have a true story about the scion tc and neon srt-4. LoL I was bugging out with my friend with the SRT-4 and I have S/C with ZPI 9lb plus and the 110 bpv. I wasn't impressed with the SRT-4 after I saw it in action when him and I was bugging out. I heard so much hype about it, anyway. off the subject with the SRT-4 and Back the Scion Tc.
#65
Google is your friend, never believe what so and so says until you google it, just smile and nod.
Personally, I think the all aluminum engine in the tC is a great platform for modding. I think people should consider dyno queens to actual performance and drivability.
Personally, I think the all aluminum engine in the tC is a great platform for modding. I think people should consider dyno queens to actual performance and drivability.
#66
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
The reason for lower horsepower could be related to a variety of reasons. Engine management, Air/Fuel ratio, exhaust flow and back pressure, intercooler size and turbo boost. Plus, consistent performance is more important than 501 hp dyno runs. Who knows how that car would run after heat soak.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
dude not to start a debate but i used to on a 2003 civic si. i put a k24 motor out of crv with 24000 miles and an a2 head out of a type s i also had a rev hard stage 1 turbo kit with a k pro enough said with this bolt ons and tuning i drove the car daily for two years on pump gas at 13psi and on race days i used race fuel and brought the boost all the way up to 17 psi. know the only reason why i say two years is beacause the car was stolen but i bet you who ever stole the engine,k-pro and tranny out of my car is still using that same set up in thier integra civic rsx whatever because people in yonkers,ny are just grimey.know honda k series are way stronger then the 2az and its not because of the 2az head because the bottom is weak.know i own a tc and love it i will soon be turboed by zpi and just waiting for dezod to come out with thier EMS. once they com out with thier EMS i will also by pistons and rods throught them and i will tell you how much boost a stock 2az can take
#67
How much did you put into that engine, parts and labor? If you did it yourself, how much would someone expect to pay to have that stuff installed?
#68
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
The reason for lower horsepower could be related to a variety of reasons. Engine management, Air/Fuel ratio, exhaust flow and back pressure, intercooler size and turbo boost. Plus, consistent performance is more important than 501 hp dyno runs. Who knows how that car would run after heat soak.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
I know the guy it has stock internals. Heat soak or not it still made 501 so when it cools down it will do it again.
#69
Originally Posted by Rasta
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
The reason for lower horsepower could be related to a variety of reasons. Engine management, Air/Fuel ratio, exhaust flow and back pressure, intercooler size and turbo boost. Plus, consistent performance is more important than 501 hp dyno runs. Who knows how that car would run after heat soak.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
Also, are you considering how much was invested in that car compared to yours? And what the owner of that vehicle could have purchased with the money invested+the car? 25k+ for the car (probably 27,000 out the door), then maybe at least 10k in modifications and tuning. He could have bought a real car, ie, STi, Evo or Corvette. Cars that can turn and accelerate consistently.
I sincerely doubt that Acura was running with stock internals. Forced induction cars can't run with 11:1 compression, they need the lower compression to compensate for the higher amounts of air being forced into the cylinders. If it was stock, I wonder what kinds of issues that car is having now.
Stock maximum boost is 15 psi for Dodge SRTs.
Evo's boost 1.5 Bar all day, thats almost 21 psi.
I know the guy it has stock internals. Heat soak or not it still made 501 so when it cools down it will do it again.
#70
Originally Posted by EvolutionxB
How much did you put into that engine, parts and labor? If you did it yourself, how much would someone expect to pay to have that stuff installed?
#72
Re: A little disappointed with the TC engine..
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by Rasta
The 501whp by the way was at 17psi on racegas
And just how much hp do you think a tC would make on 17 PSI and racegas? We just need more time to push the motor that far. The car has only been out for what 3 years.
#73
If Honda makes stronger motors then Toyota why did you guys get a Tc? From personal experience I had more problems with a Honda motor then a Toyota motor. I had Honda accord 1990, an Acura Integra 1994, Subaru legacy 1991, ES300 1999, Celica gts 2000 and now I have a 2006 TC. I have been thru alot of cars. LOL All of them was stick but the ES 300 and Subaru wasn't. My Integra and accord motor died on me after I put a few mods on them (Way me lord) . I sold the legacy to my cousin and he crashed it. My mother crashed my ES 300 but it’s fix now. My sold the Celica to my ex. That was a dumb move but the car was under her name anyway. I should kept it . Now I have the Tc. If don’t believe me I can show pixs of all of my old cars. All I have to say is that I didn’t have any problems with my Toyota motors so I can’t complaint.
#74
Sorry, but I have to go back to the srt-4. One of my friends ownes one, it run's 11's all day on stock internals. At the track he cranks up to 27psi, daily driving is around 19psi. Those motors are tuff and built to handle some serious boost, 8.0:1 stock pistons. With just a stock block they are capable of making way more power than the tC. But like I always say, at the end of the day, IT'S STILL A NEON.
Again sorry for being off topic but, has anyone seen the new Dodge Caliper srt-4? It has the same motor as the Neon and is running 300 HP stock.
Again sorry for being off topic but, has anyone seen the new Dodge Caliper srt-4? It has the same motor as the Neon and is running 300 HP stock.
#75
Originally Posted by cessblood
If Honda makes stronger motors then Toyota why did you guys get a Tc? From personal experience I had more problems with a Honda motor then a Toyota motor. I had Honda accord 1990, an Acura Integra 1994, Subaru legacy 1991, ES300 1999, Celica gts 2000 and now I have a 2006 TC. I have been thru alot of cars. LOL All of them was stick but the ES 300 and Subaru wasn't. My Integra and accord motor died on me after I put a few mods on them (Way me lord) . I sold the legacy to my cousin and he crashed it. My mother crashed my ES 300 but it’s fix now. My sold the Celica to my ex. That was a dumb move but the car was under her name anyway. I should kept it . Now I have the Tc. If don’t believe me I can show pixs of all of my old cars. All I have to say is that I didn’t have any problems with my Toyota motors so I can’t complaint.
Now, back in the early 90's some Honda's were hit or miss with quality as far as interior and exterior life spans. But they were significantly improved by mid 90's and are still improving, like any car manufacture today. Not to mention, if you look at the 80's a lot of Toyota's fell apart fairly easily as well. But, i don't know where you live but i've lived in Ga, Sc, and Nc and i have to tell you, finding a Toyota or Honda on the side of the road has been rare. Usually its Nissan, Dodge, Ford, Mitsubishi.
By the way, i don't own a tC.
Cdubbler - Built tough? Srt-4? Is that why their tranny's have a life span of 70,000 miles? Is that why if you go on a srt-4 forum you can find a ton of issues with any given part of that motor with the motors only having 20,000? Its not strong, it can make power yes but its by far from a strong platform. If it was, you wouldn't see so many of them running like hell.
#76
Originally Posted by cdubber9
One of my friends ownes one, it run's 11's all day on stock internals. At the track he cranks up to 27psi, daily driving is around 19psi. Those motors are tuff and built to handle some serious boost, 8.0:1 stock pistons.
#77
Originally Posted by cdubber9
Again sorry for being off topic but, has anyone seen the new Dodge Caliper srt-4? It has the same motor as the Neon and is running 300 HP stock.
Caliper srt-4 has "a better motor then the Noen"
Oh yeah I do take care of my cars killerxromances. I have family in NC also
#79
Cdubbler - Built tough? Srt-4? Is that why their tranny's have a life span of 70,000 miles? Is that why if you go on a srt-4 forum you can find a ton of issues with any given part of that motor with the motors only having 20,000? Its not strong, it can make power yes but its by far from a strong platform. If it was, you wouldn't see so many of them running like hell.
#80
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
Originally Posted by cdubber9
One of my friends ownes one, it run's 11's all day on stock internals. At the track he cranks up to 27psi, daily driving is around 19psi. Those motors are tuff and built to handle some serious boost, 8.0:1 stock pistons.
I personally hate the car, I was just saying that motor blows ours out of the water