Peteyd's famous missing dyno graph :P
07-27-2006, 03:12 PM
#4
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Hmm..."DipLESS". Paul's explanation was that the Auto Tranny shifts caused the dips in the other dyno graph. However, Petey's car is auto as well, but it seems to be a lot smoother. Paul, care to chime in on this?
And whoever it was that tried to say it only dynoed 215whp, didn't look at the graph. It shows 215whp with a DASH out to the side that shows the specific point it has 215whp. Not the peak hp being 215..
Peak is 222whp as you stated Petey...Good Job.. 
And thanks for finding that dyno graph.
And whoever it was that tried to say it only dynoed 215whp, didn't look at the graph. It shows 215whp with a DASH out to the side that shows the specific point it has 215whp. Not the peak hp being 215..
Peak is 222whp as you stated Petey...Good Job.. And thanks for finding that dyno graph.
07-27-2006, 03:18 PM
#6
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
Does this car feel like it lags alot when you're driving it?
The graph looks as if it was shifted foward. Our peak RPM is 6500. According to the graph, it would state he didn't start building boost till like, 5280rpm. 16G is known to hit full boost by like 2-3krpm. So, thing I can think would be that the graph was shifted to the right.
07-27-2006, 03:20 PM
#7
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 714
When they dyno autos, they would usually let the tranny shift by itself, thus, creating the "dips" in the graph. Look at the RPM range of that graugh. The pull was done in one gear, and high RPM. The car might be putting out even more power; the graph only shows a very small part of the powerband.
07-27-2006, 03:49 PM
#11
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Originally Posted by 318_tC
no not altered....paul can show you the difference. notice top right it says smooth 5
Even if the dyno produced a smooth line graph, it still would show significant dips in power.
07-27-2006, 03:51 PM
#13
Peteyd smoothing factor is 5 which is why his curve is crazy smooth. It takes an average of all points plotted and makes the best smooth curve to fit it. Jeff's dyno was done from 0-redline showing the shifts with zero smoothing factor.
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final gear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
Why does everything on here seem to be made out to be all full of drama, suspense and controversy?
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final gear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
Why does everything on here seem to be made out to be all full of drama, suspense and controversy?
07-27-2006, 03:54 PM
#15
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Peteyd smoothing factor is 5 which is why his curve is crazy smooth. It takes an average of all points plotted and makes the best smooth curve to fit it. Jeff's dyno was done from 0-redline showing the shifts with zero smoothing factor.
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final dear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final dear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
So, being that the dyno was done from 5200 rpm up and probably in the final gear, Is it possible he is making MORE power or LESS power than what the graph is showing?
No drama, contreversy...Just want an understanding for comparision sake.
07-27-2006, 03:59 PM
#16
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Peteyd smoothing factor is 5 which is why his curve is crazy smooth. It takes an average of all points plotted and makes the best smooth curve to fit it. Jeff's dyno was done from 0-redline showing the shifts with zero smoothing factor.
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final dear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
Not to mention, Peteyd's dyno was done from 5200 rpms up probably in final dear on the auto. Not a very accurate depiction of the power it has/may have but hey it gives ya some what of an idea what's going on.
THAT is why the graphs look drastically different Rhythm
Like apples to oranges in this case.
So, being that the dyno was done from 5200 rpm up and probably in the final gear, Is it possible he is making MORE power or LESS power than what the graph is showing?
No drama, contreversy...Just want an understanding for comparision sake.
(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower
Derive accordingly.
07-27-2006, 04:06 PM
#18
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
You give me a math equation....
Thanks for the straight forward answer.
A simple YES or NO would have sufficed.
Thanks for the straight forward answer.
A simple YES or NO would have sufficed.
