ScionGT35R 476whp@19psi pics all over
#82
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
He better! I'm anxious to see it running!!
You are lost, bro.
#83
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
He better! I'm anxious to see it running!!
You are lost, bro.
#84
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Originally Posted by ScionGT35R
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
He better! I'm anxious to see it running!!
You are lost, bro.
#85
Originally Posted by ScionGT35R
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by soros151
He better! I'm anxious to see it running!!
You are lost, bro.
#86
Originally Posted by mikescion
Thank you ScionGT35r for keeping us up to date with the build and any problems that you ran into and how to fix them. Let me know if you can when its all done what the fuel setup is going to be that would help me alot..
Originally we had a Walbro in-tank 255lph fuel pump using the stock lines to the rail and added an Aeromotive 1:1 pressure regulator to the stock fuel rail and also added a -6 fuel line to the tank to be used as a return line. We had 750cc Siemens Deka low impedance injectors with in-line resistors so the E-manage can work correctly.
Now we are going to install a second Walbro 255lph in-tank: so we are going to have twin Walbro's in the tank with a new -8 line going from the Fuel tank to the fuel rail and using the same -6 line as a return. We switched to a custom Fuel rail and kept the same Aeromotive regulator directly attached to the rail.
At that time we are going to test the setup as indicated and see what numbers we can achieve with the 750cc injectors. Normally I would install bigger injectors but since we are still running the E-manage I am reluctant to go bigger because it will be very difficult for the piggy back to run correctly at part throttle and the fuel consumption will be horrible!!
Pito
#87
I'm sorry i never knew about in-line resistors so the emanage can work correctly... can you shine some light on that for me? I was reading on another forum for other cars like The RSX and they are raising there idle to 1000rpms and running 850cc's on a piggy back would that work for our car?
#88
Originally Posted by mikescion
I'm sorry i never knew about in-line resistors so the emanage can work correctly... can you shine some light on that for me?
Originally Posted by mikescion
I was reading on another forum for other cars like The RSX and they are raising there idle to 1000rpms and running 850cc's on a piggy back would that work for our car?
It might work, might not: the question is if it will run good in every day driving and if the fuel consumption will be tolerable.
Pito
#96
Originally Posted by Keeshwah
pardon my ignorance, but why would u want to raise the idle?
#98
Originally Posted by mikescion
see there we go holding back on info like its a treasure LOL how ___....hmmm
Pito
#99
^ yea the only reason why I could see ...like i said before .... is cause if you are high in the RPM's and you take it out of gear it slams below 1k and then bounces up 200rpm ..... I could see benefit if you changed it a veryyyy veryyy small amount (like 100rpm - if that is even possible I am not sure).
#100
Originally Posted by Mecanica_Pito
Originally Posted by mikescion
see there we go holding back on info like its a treasure LOL how ___....hmmm
Pito