Is there anyone with a Roots type S/C??
#21
THATS ONLY BCUZ Of the massive amount of work and it has both and didnt make any power but it did LOOK cool and the idea was cool but a roots typ s/c would be more simple and definately do better than the centrifugal
#24
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
Educated guess? A turbo puts NO load on an engine, a supercharger does. That means that a supercharger is robbing horsepower from the engine at all times. And a Roots has MORE drain than a centrifugal. It's a proven fact that turbos are more efficient than superchargers. It's the reason why the TRD S/C only puts down 220 on 10PSI and an equally sized turbo puts down 300.
#25
true but the FLOW is totally different .....like different turbos have different results....like i said its not proven how the 2azfe will respond to this s/c...so its pointless to argue....point is i think it would be cool
#28
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,645
It's just another form of boosting that has limits. We already have the TRD S/C and about 10 turbo kits, plus custom stuff...it's all the same.
How about a 350 with a Roots blower? Then it would be ____ing badass. Easy 700WHP.
How about a 350 with a Roots blower? Then it would be ____ing badass. Easy 700WHP.
#29
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
It's just another form of boosting that has limits. We already have the TRD S/C and about 10 turbo kits, plus custom stuff...it's all the same.
How about a 350 with a Roots blower? Then it would be flippin' badass. Easy 700WHP.
How about a 350 with a Roots blower? Then it would be flippin' badass. Easy 700WHP.
#32
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
be quiet biscuit, i won you lost game over gtfo.
I just had to end the maturity.
I just had to end the maturity.
#33
turbos DO put a load on the engine. Power in = power out, this is mandated by physics. there is no power made for free. Turbos create backpressure, thus, they take power to create power. The difference is that a turbo is more efficient in turning that used power into a gain, making them a bit better at power production.
However, a roots type blower (unlike the centrifugal units) produces power curve that is closer to linear.. thus, you can eliminate a lot of lag with them. Lets not rule them out since nearly all super high powered setups run them And people need to stop comparing peak power output... more area under the curve will win every time, period.. so a huge turbo producing more power will lose to a setup that may create a little less peak but has more area under the curve. And the latter will be more driveable, especially on a track (you know.. one where you actually turn the wheel ).
But, for the price and street level power, turbos typically are better.
If you are willing to, and can figure out how to stuff a roots blower in the awkward space where our intake resides.. annnd can find one that works well for our app... then a sequential boost setup would be actually useful (Doing it with a centrifugal unit is pretty useless really) since you could run a large turbo and get rid of most of the lag with the blower.
But, in the end, with what is out there you may as well just run a turbo.
However, a roots type blower (unlike the centrifugal units) produces power curve that is closer to linear.. thus, you can eliminate a lot of lag with them. Lets not rule them out since nearly all super high powered setups run them And people need to stop comparing peak power output... more area under the curve will win every time, period.. so a huge turbo producing more power will lose to a setup that may create a little less peak but has more area under the curve. And the latter will be more driveable, especially on a track (you know.. one where you actually turn the wheel ).
But, for the price and street level power, turbos typically are better.
If you are willing to, and can figure out how to stuff a roots blower in the awkward space where our intake resides.. annnd can find one that works well for our app... then a sequential boost setup would be actually useful (Doing it with a centrifugal unit is pretty useless really) since you could run a large turbo and get rid of most of the lag with the blower.
But, in the end, with what is out there you may as well just run a turbo.
#35
There is a company that made one for the new si. It puts out some sweet power too. Its not comptech or jackson. Its like redline or something alone those lines. I will see if I can fidn them then maybe ask them. LOL
#36
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com/R...erchargers.htm
They are expensive. Turbo is just more economical and fesable. But you want another person to ask so hit them up LOL
They are expensive. Turbo is just more economical and fesable. But you want another person to ask so hit them up LOL
#37
yeah I saw that same install online as well.It did really good power wise.They also tried one for the 1az motor as well but the computer got in the way and it was not cost effective to build and have to do a complete standalone.Seems turbo is really the way to go with 4 banger motor.Once someone cracks the ECU then the add on power plants will come.
#40
I know plenty of Miata owners that LOVE theirs. If a maker has poor quality, that has nothing to do with the style. I know a miata running over 300 whp on his and loves every bit of it