Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Tikbhoy's Supercharger Adventure!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2005, 08:33 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
tikbhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,576
Default

Originally Posted by duston831
quick question.......... when you go get the s/c installed, do you have to have the stock airbox on? or can you just leave an aftermarket intake?
there isnt any aftermarket intake available to fit the trd sc for now, you will have to modify your cai/sri to fit.
tikbhoy is offline  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:13 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
tikbhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,576
Default

Modification
-OBX axleback exhaust
-Intake is stock





tikbhoy is offline  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:17 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
jmiller20874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,004
Default

Great numbers!! HP goes clear to redline.
jmiller20874 is offline  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:52 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
aarontrini85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,677
Default

Originally Posted by jmiller20874
Great numbers!! HP goes clear to redline.

time to get a gready emanage ultimit and remove the rev limiter
aarontrini85 is offline  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:14 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TurboCustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 692
Default

Wow, that A/F chart sucks. You have the reflash I assume since its not overly rich. I would have expected a much cleaner chart for a car with a TRD map on it.

HP numbers look good though. Makes nice linear power although its a little shaky on the top end. I'd like to see an A/F chart of a SC car with a pully on it to see how the reflash reacts to more boost. A/F's are in a nice spot for 7ish pounds though. Nice and safe.

Charles
TurboCustomz is offline  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:16 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Harman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CA, San Francisco
Posts: 237
Default

Great! Boost is nice and linear. AFR is kinda low near the end of the curve tho. Overall, the gain is impressive.
Harman is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:18 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
kungpaosamuraiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,726
Default

It looks like there is about 10 to 20 more hp at the top of the powerband.

Someone should really make a dampened lightweight pulley. I suspect the difference between a 7 psi turbo and 7 psi supercharger would be greatly lessoned with less weight for the crank to bleed into boost.

I wonder if that'll help with a smaller sc pulley. If it's underdrive for more boost, it should decrease parasitic loss right?
kungpaosamuraiii is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 06:38 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DTRUONG_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 2,905
Default

niice numbers man.
DTRUONG_112 is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 03:13 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
ZPIracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 993
Default

why does the dyno say flywheel power
ZPIracing is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 04:54 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TurboCustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 692
Default

Their voicemail says, "Chassis Dyno Facility". Most likely a miss print.
TurboCustomz is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 04:57 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
-Keith-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nor-Cal Scikotics
Posts: 1,811
Default

Thats what I was looking at too if thats flywheel uhh.... yea..

And ZPI said the intake gave it 20 more whp... I guess the reflash screws everything up huh...

If I do go S/C no reflash.... thats for sure
-Keith- is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:09 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Munch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,426
Default

Originally Posted by -Keith-
Thats what I was looking at too if thats flywheel uhh.... yea..

And ZPI said the intake gave it 20 more whp... I guess the reflash screws everything up huh...

If I do go S/C no reflash.... thats for sure
It says he had a stock intake.
Munch is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:16 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
BreakTheStatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 320
Default

Yea but in the picture he posted right before the dyno, he had a custom made intake. Maybe he did the dyno before he modded the intake?

*edit*

Just checked the timestamp on the dyno and it has nov 15th, and the other picture was posted on the 13th so there goes that theory. Tikbhoy, did you put the stock airbox back on for the dyno, or was that just a typo from your post?
BreakTheStatic is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:53 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

I noticed the "flywheel" label too. Tikbhoy, is it a chassis dyno, or is it a flywheel.
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:13 PM
  #75  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scionetics
KAD
SL Member
 
paul_dezod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 11,936
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
I noticed the "flywheel" label too. Tikbhoy, is it a chassis dyno, or is it a flywheel.
FYI:
DynoPack is a hub dyno system. The wheels must be removed to dyno the vehicle. Typically these read higher than other dynos because they do not take into account friction coefficient from the tires to the pavement like some other dynos do.
paul_dezod is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:39 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
I noticed the "flywheel" label too. Tikbhoy, is it a chassis dyno, or is it a flywheel.
FYI:
DynoPack is a hub dyno system. The wheels must be removed to dyno the vehicle. Typically these read higher than other dynos because they do not take into account friction coefficient from the tires to the pavement like some other dynos do.

Ahhh...good info.
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:30 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DTRUONG_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 2,905
Default

good to know that.
DTRUONG_112 is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:00 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
seen4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
I noticed the "flywheel" label too. Tikbhoy, is it a chassis dyno, or is it a flywheel.
FYI:
DynoPack is a hub dyno system. The wheels must be removed to dyno the vehicle. Typically these read higher than other dynos because they do not take into account friction coefficient from the tires to the pavement like some other dynos do.
dynopack does go by hub dyno, but the dyno says "flywheel' because it measures horsepower from the flywheel of the dyno. aka, there are two units, one on each wheel. the hubs turn a flywheel which is used to measure hp. so flywheel hp is the whp or hub wp the dyno generals. Depending on the calibrations of the dyno, it can be made to read more than a dyno jet or less. Much the same as Automotion's dyno that ZPI uses, which is known to be off from the dynojet here in louisville by making more HP. every dyno is different but if you use the same one to tune on, thats all that matters.
seen4ever is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:31 PM
  #79  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scionetics
KAD
SL Member
 
paul_dezod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 11,936
Default

Originally Posted by seen4ever
Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
I noticed the "flywheel" label too. Tikbhoy, is it a chassis dyno, or is it a flywheel.
FYI:
DynoPack is a hub dyno system. The wheels must be removed to dyno the vehicle. Typically these read higher than other dynos because they do not take into account friction coefficient from the tires to the pavement like some other dynos do.
dynopack does go by hub dyno, but the dyno says "flywheel' because it measures horsepower from the flywheel of the dyno. aka, there are two units, one on each wheel. the hubs turn a flywheel which is used to measure hp. so flywheel hp is the whp or hub wp the dyno generals. Depending on the calibrations of the dyno, it can be made to read more than a dyno jet or less. Much the same as Automotion's dyno that ZPI uses, which is known to be off from the dynojet here in louisville by making more HP. every dyno is different but if you use the same one to tune on, thats all that matters.
True to an extent. Correction and smoothing can alter the numbers a little, but still overall every Dynopack I have encountered has read higher than a DynoJet. EVERY dyno reads different even DynoJet to DynoJet. That is true.
paul_dezod is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 10:06 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
seen4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 164
Default

i would also venture to say that dynopaks are the most correct dyno's on the market. Yet they are pricey, plus they can actually place load on the car rather than the dynojet.
seen4ever is offline  


Quick Reply: Tikbhoy's Supercharger Adventure!



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.