Tuned by Church dyno sheet!!car pics up
12-10-2009 | 11:43 PM
#41
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 882
From: Norco, CA
no where near the power ur making.. i put 212whp and 216wtq on a mustang dyno... and yea 4 months then 4th gear went, 3rd went and so on. i had the B&M cooler aswell. honestly if ur making 309wtq and u have floored ur car before through the gears, ur tranny would have taken a ____ instantly.
12-11-2009 | 03:37 AM
#43
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 882
From: Norco, CA
not ball bearing of course but will do.
12-11-2009 | 03:41 AM
#44
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 882
From: Norco, CA
12-11-2009 | 05:52 PM
#46
no where near the power ur making.. i put 212whp and 216wtq on a mustang dyno... and yea 4 months then 4th gear went, 3rd went and so on. i had the B&M cooler aswell. honestly if ur making 309wtq and u have floored ur car before through the gears, ur tranny would have taken a ____ instantly.
FWIW, IPT recommends NV Amsoil syn ATF, not the LV version. A M1 tech I spoke with felt that the viscosity difference between M1 syn and WS is slight enough that M1 should work fine in place of WS. They just can't officially approve M1 syn for WS use because of the viscosity difference and IMO, the fact that Exxon Mobil makes WS for Toyota NA.
AFAIK, low viscosity full syn ATFs rated for WS use are Amsoil LV and Red Line D6. Normal viscosity full syn ATFs to replace T-IV and WS (unofficially) are Amsoil, D4, M1 and Eneos. I have not found anything to suggest that Toyota made any changes to the U241E tranny when they switched from T-IV to WS. Just as Toyota made no changes to the 2AZ-FE when they switched from 5w30 to 0w20 motor oil.
To the OP, what ATF are you running?
12-12-2009 | 03:17 AM
#48
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,156
From: Orlando, FL
Did you change your ATF when you installed the B&M cooler? If so, what did you change from/to? I'm currently working on a theory that changing out Toyo's "fuel economy" low viscosity WS fluid for a full syn normal viscosity fluid will improve line pressure, reduce slippage and temps.
FWIW, IPT recommends NV Amsoil syn ATF, not the LV version. A M1 tech I spoke with felt that the viscosity difference between M1 syn and WS is slight enough that M1 should work fine in place of WS. They just can't officially approve M1 syn for WS use because of the viscosity difference and IMO, the fact that Exxon Mobil makes WS for Toyota NA.
AFAIK, low viscosity full syn ATFs rated for WS use are Amsoil LV and Red Line D6. Normal viscosity full syn ATFs to replace T-IV and WS (unofficially) are Amsoil, D4, M1 and Eneos. I have not found anything to suggest that Toyota made any changes to the U241E tranny when they switched from T-IV to WS. Just as Toyota made no changes to the 2AZ-FE when they switched from 5w30 to 0w20 motor oil.
To the OP, what ATF are you running?
FWIW, IPT recommends NV Amsoil syn ATF, not the LV version. A M1 tech I spoke with felt that the viscosity difference between M1 syn and WS is slight enough that M1 should work fine in place of WS. They just can't officially approve M1 syn for WS use because of the viscosity difference and IMO, the fact that Exxon Mobil makes WS for Toyota NA.
AFAIK, low viscosity full syn ATFs rated for WS use are Amsoil LV and Red Line D6. Normal viscosity full syn ATFs to replace T-IV and WS (unofficially) are Amsoil, D4, M1 and Eneos. I have not found anything to suggest that Toyota made any changes to the U241E tranny when they switched from T-IV to WS. Just as Toyota made no changes to the 2AZ-FE when they switched from 5w30 to 0w20 motor oil.
To the OP, what ATF are you running?
12-12-2009 | 03:50 AM
#49
What's with this extended length abbreviation thing? I thought all keyboards came with all 26 letters on it 
Just kidding, I guess I gotta catch up on my internet lingo morse code stuff...
Just kidding, I guess I gotta catch up on my internet lingo morse code stuff...
12-12-2009 | 03:57 AM
#50
I've heard that before but DezodDon says they don't and offers strong supporting evidence.
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...=161914&page=4
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...=161914&page=4
12-12-2009 | 09:38 AM
#51
Member
SL Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
From: virginia
nice #'s i'm also auto and boosted for couple months. my #'s aren't high as yours tho. running turbonetics kit with 8psi and a 3" turbo back exhaust from p-tuning also tuned by them. hopefully mine lasts as long as yours if not i wouldnt be too disappointed to do a manual swap! my psi spikes crazy at WOT tho
12-12-2009 | 08:58 PM
#52
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 882
From: Norco, CA
For the past 3 tranny fluid changes I have been using Motul n dame for my oil changes, n the only thing that I changed from the tranny cooler was the hoses, n the fitting that conects the tranny fluid lines, reason was because the original B&M hose burst n I didn't know till I smelled it, I almost lost half of my fluid tranny 
but good thing I noticed it quick.....
but good thing I noticed it quick.....
12-13-2009 | 10:05 AM
#53
For the past 3 tranny fluid changes I have been using Motul n dame for my oil changes, n the only thing that I changed from the tranny cooler was the hoses, n the fitting that conects the tranny fluid lines, reason was because the original B&M hose burst n I didn't know till I smelled it, I almost lost half of my fluid tranny but good thing I noticed it quick.....
but good thing I noticed it quick.....
