Turbo'd Mazda RX8?
05-30-2008, 04:01 AM
#24
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by 20tCDude05
Originally Posted by B_Real45
Get an SRT-4 and be done with it.. Low cost car with gobs of HP.. and super mod-able.
Or if you want a nicer car just get the 350Z
Or if you want a nicer car just get the 350Z
and im only runnin 8psi.
05-30-2008, 04:03 AM
#26
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,603
Originally Posted by scionkidd
I raced my friend paul in his stage 3 mopar srt-4... its not on the turbo tC's status!
and im only runnin 8psi.
Disregard if you meant it whooped your butt.
05-30-2008, 04:07 AM
#27
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by 20tCDude05
You kidding me? Jeff Straka made 454WHP with his amazing tC and he was like in the 12.5 sec range.
You beat a M5 with a turbo'd tC? Hard to believe.
You beat a M5 with a turbo'd tC? Hard to believe.
same... a turbo tC makes mid 12's range too!
honestly I took an M5...
i did keep up with a Hooked up SRT-8 Charger- im not gonna say i won cuz i didn't but neither did he. he said he was hooked up and was putting down 500hp/500tq.
i raced a LS1 corvette from the dig... he took off a half car length (tC's suck in getting grip on the 1st gear) second gear, third gear i caught up with him... 90 or so mph, i was a nose up and then he backed out- chicken!
05-30-2008, 04:10 AM
#28
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by 20tCDude05
You kidding me? Jeff Straka made 454WHP with his amazing tC and he was like in the 12.5 sec range.
You beat a M5 with a turbo'd tC? Hard to believe.
You beat a M5 with a turbo'd tC? Hard to believe.
but that just proves the potential of a tCJeff may have VERY BAD grip issues or something but he should be a LOT faster than that!
05-30-2008, 04:12 AM
#29
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,686
Originally Posted by scionkidd
just cuz its 300WHP is doesn't mean its fast...
the stock is slower than a stock tC... i dont care what people here say, I've raced several and I come in front every time!
the M5 has "500" hp but by a 'heart break' load dyno it puts down 428 to the pavement.
my turbo tC (greddy) puts down 258WHP/ 273WTQ and takes an M5. no joke not makin this up!
RX-8's are overrated very much, especially power wise... it all comes down to the 1/4 mile time... a turbo tC is easily in the 12's range
the stock is slower than a stock tC... i dont care what people here say, I've raced several and I come in front every time!
the M5 has "500" hp but by a 'heart break' load dyno it puts down 428 to the pavement.
my turbo tC (greddy) puts down 258WHP/ 273WTQ and takes an M5. no joke not makin this up!
RX-8's are overrated very much, especially power wise... it all comes down to the 1/4 mile time... a turbo tC is easily in the 12's range
second, there's no way your greddy tC takes a new M5. that's just not happening. maybe an old model. those of us with TurboToyota kits running higher PSI levels MIGHT be able to keep up with a brand new M5 and take it on a good day from a roll.
third, it doesn't all come down to 1/4 mile time. sorry. an RX-8 would devour a tC (stock) on any sort of road with curves. and i wouldn't say a turbo tC is "easily" in the 12's. you ever wonder why a 300whp tC runs 13 but a 450whp tC runs 12.5? FWD + insane power = no traction. high hp does not mean fast 1/4 mile time (since that's all that matters in your book).
normally i don't post something like this, but your comment was so ridiculous i just felt the need to address it.
05-30-2008, 04:12 AM
#30
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 2,280
You don't understand. Average WHP for a turbo'd tC without major builds are like 250WHP at 8 lbs or so. Jeff had a completely built bottom end and head I think and he made 454WHP and 458WTQ, one of the fastest daily driving tCs ever on the boards.
05-30-2008, 04:13 AM
#31
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by B_Real45
Originally Posted by scionkidd
I raced my friend paul in his stage 3 mopar srt-4... its not on the turbo tC's status!
and im only runnin 8psi.
Disregard if you meant it whooped your butt.
05-30-2008, 04:14 AM
#33
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 2,280
05-30-2008, 04:21 AM
#34
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by jaxtcracer
Originally Posted by scionkidd
just cuz its 300WHP is doesn't mean its fast...
the stock is slower than a stock tC... i dont care what people here say, I've raced several and I come in front every time!
the M5 has "500" hp but by a 'heart break' load dyno it puts down 428 to the pavement.
my turbo tC (greddy) puts down 258WHP/ 273WTQ and takes an M5. no joke not makin this up!
RX-8's are overrated very much, especially power wise... it all comes down to the 1/4 mile time... a turbo tC is easily in the 12's range
the stock is slower than a stock tC... i dont care what people here say, I've raced several and I come in front every time!
the M5 has "500" hp but by a 'heart break' load dyno it puts down 428 to the pavement.
my turbo tC (greddy) puts down 258WHP/ 273WTQ and takes an M5. no joke not makin this up!
RX-8's are overrated very much, especially power wise... it all comes down to the 1/4 mile time... a turbo tC is easily in the 12's range
second, there's no way your greddy tC takes a new M5. that's just not happening. maybe an old model. those of us with TurboToyota kits running higher PSI levels MIGHT be able to keep up with a brand new M5 and take it on a good day from a roll.
third, it doesn't all come down to 1/4 mile time. sorry. an RX-8 would devour a tC (stock) on any sort of road with curves. and i wouldn't say a turbo tC is "easily" in the 12's. you ever wonder why a 300whp tC runs 13 but a 450whp tC runs 12.5? FWD + insane power = no traction. high hp does not mean fast 1/4 mile time (since that's all that matters in your book).
normally i don't post something like this, but your comment was so ridiculous i just felt the need to address it.
secondly- dont try to put down my greddy kit... I know I've beaten the M5 and its developed a big arguement here on SL before but i know what I raced and I know the outcome!
thirdly- We are talking about the power in this thread so im sorry but yes it is coming down to the 1/4 mile time. my tC takes an EVO so bad... and an EVO does 13.2 1/4 mile time.
my comment is not ridiculous... its the truth
I dont disagree with your disbelief but Im not lying here...
05-30-2008, 04:22 AM
#35
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by 20tCDude05
You don't understand. Average WHP for a turbo'd tC without major builds are like 250WHP at 8 lbs or so. Jeff had a completely built bottom end and head I think and he made 454WHP and 458WTQ, one of the fastest daily driving tCs ever on the boards.
05-30-2008, 04:24 AM
#36
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I Shoot Flames!
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by B_Real45
lol - my buddy's stage 3 mopar SRT-4 puts down 325whp - and your tC at 8psi makes how much?
no way im sayin im faster, im Quicker!
