jl audio subs
#24
depends on the type of sub and how much bass you want. Usually the more subs the more bass but in JLs case if you get a 12" w6 or pretty much and w7 by itself you will have a lot of bass. 2 is the usual amount people throw in their trunk, but one is common too. Its all has to do with your bass needs.
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
#25
Originally Posted by PlayinWithFire
Originally Posted by SCI_TC_GUY
^^^ don't get a capacitor, they don't work like everyone thinks they do... 1 10w3v2 would hit pretty good and sound really clean!!
if you go extreme ud need to updrage the battery and alternator
if you can't tell ive been studying for my honors physics final
#26
Originally Posted by all4degame
10w7 will knock the wind out of you, but not much sq
#27
You can't go wrong with JL.
A w7 is what I consider a jekyll and hyde sub. They can be set up for sq, but most of the time people who spend that kind of money want to hit one note, and hit it hard...
It all depends on how the speaker is setup...
The JL slash amplifiers are regulated internally and I don't see the need for a cap...
I personally don't like caps, I feel the manufacturer should have designed a better amp...
There are the few occasions, which a cap might be ok, like classical music. Classical music has a large dynamic range. There are times where the sound level of the music tapers off, and then the volume is increased almost instantly.
But with music that we probably listen to, I suggest investing in a good amp and thicker power wires...
A w7 is what I consider a jekyll and hyde sub. They can be set up for sq, but most of the time people who spend that kind of money want to hit one note, and hit it hard...
It all depends on how the speaker is setup...
The JL slash amplifiers are regulated internally and I don't see the need for a cap...
I personally don't like caps, I feel the manufacturer should have designed a better amp...
There are the few occasions, which a cap might be ok, like classical music. Classical music has a large dynamic range. There are times where the sound level of the music tapers off, and then the volume is increased almost instantly.
But with music that we probably listen to, I suggest investing in a good amp and thicker power wires...
#28
Originally Posted by SCI_TC_GUY
Originally Posted by all4degame
10w7 will knock the wind out of you, but not much sq
#29
naturally, if you're beating the hell out of a W7, it's going to lose some SQ... but put it up against any of the other JL subs at a level for SQ (probably around 120dB) and it's all around better sounding IMO... in a strictly SQ environment, the W7's are amazing....
#30
Originally Posted by oneslowxa
...
A w7 is what I consider a jekyll and hyde sub. They can be set up for sq, but most of the time people who spend that kind of money want to hit one note, and hit it hard...
A w7 is what I consider a jekyll and hyde sub. They can be set up for sq, but most of the time people who spend that kind of money want to hit one note, and hit it hard...
#31
depends on the type of sub and how much bass you want. Usually the more subs the more bass but in JLs case if you get a 12" w6 or pretty much and w7 by itself you will have a lot of bass. 2 is the usual amount people throw in their trunk, but one is common too. Its all has to do with your bass needs.
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
what do you guys suggest?
#32
Re: jl audio subs
Originally Posted by beach808boyz
hey guys i just wanted to get some input about discontinued jl audio subs. i'm going to put some sounds in my tc and i was hoping to get some "quality" subs for not too much $ (oh yeah preferably 12''). so if you guys could comment on this issus like which are pretty good or which really suck, it would be much appreciated. shootz thanks!
#33
Originally Posted by beach808boyz
depends on the type of sub and how much bass you want. Usually the more subs the more bass but in JLs case if you get a 12" w6 or pretty much and w7 by itself you will have a lot of bass. 2 is the usual amount people throw in their trunk, but one is common too. Its all has to do with your bass needs.
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
you want a rattling car or just enough to add a lil umph to your music?
what do you guys suggest?
well honestly JLs hit so tight that they are only "obnoxious" when you turn up the bass level and the volume... how about a couple of Wv0's or 1's or something... like 12". I really reccommend goin to tweeter just to hear what each sound like.
#35
I have a pair of JL 12W6 (the first gen) in my Mustang and I think it's only being fed about 150Watts each and they're pretty awesome. You'll enjoy the W6 V2s if you decide to get those.
With that said, when I do decide to put subs in my Scion, it needs to be JL subs (unless I can get my hands on some Adire Braumas, the mustang board seems to rave about). I thought about yanking the subs out of my Mustang and putting it in the Tc, but those subs are almost 10 years old (still sounds good though), so I'm thinking about picking up new ones.
Anyway, how does the original 12W6 subs compare to the current JL subs? I know the W6v2 would blow away my W6s, but how does it compare to the W3v2/3, and the W1v2s? I want something that hits just as hard as the o.g. W6s and if the W3v3 does it, I'll pick those up instead of the W6v2s or W7s.
With that said, when I do decide to put subs in my Scion, it needs to be JL subs (unless I can get my hands on some Adire Braumas, the mustang board seems to rave about). I thought about yanking the subs out of my Mustang and putting it in the Tc, but those subs are almost 10 years old (still sounds good though), so I'm thinking about picking up new ones.
Anyway, how does the original 12W6 subs compare to the current JL subs? I know the W6v2 would blow away my W6s, but how does it compare to the W3v2/3, and the W1v2s? I want something that hits just as hard as the o.g. W6s and if the W3v3 does it, I'll pick those up instead of the W6v2s or W7s.
#36
W6's of old time Vs. W6v2's / there won't be a WHOLE LOT of difference.... I haven't had a chance to hear the W3v3's yet, but I assume a w3v3 @ RMS power VS old w6@150 watts, the w3v3 would be louder and sound better.... the old w6's were beasts and could handle a lot more than 150 watts...
#39
Senior Member
Team No Limitz
Scionetics
SL Member
Scinergy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,029
From: Surprise AZ, San Diego CA
Originally Posted by SCI_TC_GUY
W6's of old time Vs. W6v2's / there won't be a WHOLE LOT of difference.... I haven't had a chance to hear the W3v3's yet, but I assume a w3v3 @ RMS power VS old w6@150 watts, the w3v3 would be louder and sound better.... the old w6's were beasts and could handle a lot more than 150 watts...
#40
You just made my day by saying the old W6s and the v2s not having a lot of difference. Maybe those subs will come out of the Mustang and go into the Tc. The Mustang just rattles to much to really turn up the volume.
And yeah, the old W6s handles 300 Watts RMS, and they're duel 6ohm speakers. I was just guessing about the 150 Watts each part, because I have a 600 Watts MAX amp and it's stable to 2 ohms. My pair of W6s can either be wired to a 1.5 ohm load or a 3 ohm load and since my amp would blow up at 1.5 ohms, I have it wired to 3 ohms. I have no idea how this works, but if the amp pushes 600 Watts max at 4 ohms,(or is it 600 at 2 ohms?) I'm guessing it at 3 ohms is about 400 watts max? So, that makes 200 Watts max for each sub, and maybe 150 Watts RMS? Or am I just messing up my logic and my subs are getting closer to the 300 Watts RMS they were rated at? And the reason why it sounds good is because it's having the power it needs?
And yeah, the old W6s handles 300 Watts RMS, and they're duel 6ohm speakers. I was just guessing about the 150 Watts each part, because I have a 600 Watts MAX amp and it's stable to 2 ohms. My pair of W6s can either be wired to a 1.5 ohm load or a 3 ohm load and since my amp would blow up at 1.5 ohms, I have it wired to 3 ohms. I have no idea how this works, but if the amp pushes 600 Watts max at 4 ohms,(or is it 600 at 2 ohms?) I'm guessing it at 3 ohms is about 400 watts max? So, that makes 200 Watts max for each sub, and maybe 150 Watts RMS? Or am I just messing up my logic and my subs are getting closer to the 300 Watts RMS they were rated at? And the reason why it sounds good is because it's having the power it needs?