Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

anyone run 16x7 or 16x8s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2007, 09:19 AM
  #1  
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
HondaCRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 57
Default anyone run 16x7 or 16x8s?

there seems to be a huuuugeeee crowd of people who run 18s or bigger... just wondering if theres anyone who has smaller (read: lighter) wheels on their car?

Also, links to pictures would help too.... if it just looks terribly retarded, then I'll just have to stick with 17s....
HondaCRX is offline  
Old 11-19-2007, 10:24 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
07specTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 371
Default

I wanted to run 16x8s but they are hard to find.
They can be custom ordered but cost an arm and a leg.

I run 16s...tC Spec steelies.
They don't look retard to me.
07specTC is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:55 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team ScionEyed
SL Member
 
Shift_N_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Directly Infront Of You
Posts: 276
Default

sport max offers a couple of 16x8 options..... check that out
Shift_N_Red is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:01 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TeeCizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lurking Inside Your Garage!
Posts: 7,862
Default

Thats DUMB....the 17's are small enough...WHY would u wanna run a Smaller diamenter wheel??....

Just get Better wider tires!
TeeCizzle is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:11 AM
  #5  
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
shoopajae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34
Default

he might be into drag racing. to each his own. dont hate.
shoopajae is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:22 AM
  #6  
Banned
SL Member
 
recliner15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 299
Default

Weight. Look into Rota.
recliner15 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:40 AM
  #7  
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
shoopajae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34
Default

yes rota wheels are good.
shoopajae is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:54 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Adrian-the-Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Funky Town, TX
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by TeeCizzle
Thats DUMB....the 17's are small enough...WHY would u wanna run a Smaller diamenter wheel??....

Just get Better wider tires!
The smaller diameter the wheel the less the weight and less energy it takes to rotate, ergo, better acceleration.
Adrian-the-Red is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:57 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
CuRiOuSfIsH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,344
Default

I would think only the hardcore ppl wouldn't mind using 16" wheels. There are a few members on here that have 16" wheels.
CuRiOuSfIsH is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:00 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TeeCizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lurking Inside Your Garage!
Posts: 7,862
Default

Originally Posted by Adrian-the-Red
Originally Posted by TeeCizzle
Thats DUMB....the 17's are small enough...WHY would u wanna run a Smaller diamenter wheel??....

Just get Better wider tires!
The smaller diameter the wheel the less the weight and less energy it takes to rotate, ergo, better acceleration.
Thats NOT true!.....U can get 17's in a lightweight wheel...
TeeCizzle is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:02 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TeeCizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lurking Inside Your Garage!
Posts: 7,862
Default

Originally Posted by shoopajae
he might be into drag racing. to each his own. dont hate.
My Bad he was questioning 16's for his CRX....
TeeCizzle is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:24 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
HaYnSktC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 1,278
Default

i wouldnt mind running with the oem celica 16s heh
HaYnSktC is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:34 PM
  #13  
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
HondaCRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by TeeCizzle
Thats DUMB....the 17's are small enough...
What? 17s are pretty fning big for a sport compact.
rule of thumb... fit the smallest diameter wheel on the car that'll fit around the brakes...

17s are too big and heavy. The tc isn't exactly light, so any help in reducing weight (especially unsprung rotational mass) will be beneficial.

Yeah, 17s or bigger wheels may make the car LOOK better, but I car very little about the looks of a car (hence my ownership of a CRX and a G35S).

eh, 29 and yet, so uninformed. Who is the dumb one?


I just can't find ANY pictures of people running 16s on their tcs
HondaCRX is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:00 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Adorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Under your bed
Posts: 4,016
Default

we've been thinking of putting 16s on our FM tC

We'll see after this season
Adorian is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:08 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Adrian-the-Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Funky Town, TX
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by TeeCizzle
Originally Posted by Adrian-the-Red
Originally Posted by TeeCizzle
Thats DUMB....the 17's are small enough...WHY would u wanna run a Smaller diamenter wheel??....

Just get Better wider tires!
The smaller diameter the wheel the less the weight and less energy it takes to rotate, ergo, better acceleration.
Thats NOT true!.....U can get 17's in a lightweight wheel...
You're 100% right. You can get a light weight 17" wheel.

That being said, it's not just the lighter weight that allows the wheel to spin easier. The smaller diameter means more revolutions with less energy. Know where I learned that?



I think my point is secure.
Adrian-the-Red is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 05:29 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
ScionSean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 104
Default

Generally speaking most 16's will be lighter, but, depending on the material and manufacture you may find 17's that are lighter weight. I say stick with the lightest weight, most cost effective (if money is an issue) rims you can find because larger rims mean smaller tire aspect ratio (sidewall width) and will help the car handle better in the turns, since the tires will not flex as much. If you plan to drag race, then just go for the smallest, lightest wheels you can find.
ScionSean is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:19 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
djct_watt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
Default

Rotational Inertia = (mass) x (Radius^2)

Reducing mass is only one part of the formula, and a small one at that. Increases and decreases in radius (or wheels size) have an exponential effect on rotational inertia, or power loss to the wheels. Keep in mind that this also effects braking as well.

To all the handling nuts, remember to compare apples to apples, same width tires to same width and quality. High quality tires don't have to be rubber bands to have stiff sidewalls. You never ever ever ever see any rubber band tires on true race cars (ie formula one, GT, etc. . . and I'm not talking about drag slicks).

Rule of thumb (as posted above), the smallest diameter that clears the brakes. Note that all super/performance cars have big wheels, but also note that they barely clear the brakes. Ugly? Yes! Functional? Hell yes! Big wheels (larger than needed to clear the brakes) is PURELY cosmetic.
djct_watt is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:07 AM
  #18  
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
shoopajae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34
Default

omg i feel like this is my high school physics nightmare all over again. haha
shoopajae is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:24 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Zebman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Virginia, US
Posts: 1,616
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
Rotational Inertia = (mass) x (Radius^2)

Reducing mass is only one part of the formula, and a small one at that. Increases and decreases in radius (or wheels size) have an exponential effect on rotational inertia, or power loss to the wheels. Keep in mind that this also effects braking as well.

To all the handling nuts, remember to compare apples to apples, same width tires to same width and quality. High quality tires don't have to be rubber bands to have stiff sidewalls. You never ever ever ever see any rubber band tires on true race cars (ie formula one, GT, etc. . . and I'm not talking about drag slicks).

Rule of thumb (as posted above), the smallest diameter that clears the brakes. Note that all super/performance cars have big wheels, but also note that they barely clear the brakes. Ugly? Yes! Functional? Hell yes! Big wheels (larger than needed to clear the brakes) is PURELY cosmetic.
Beat me to it. Moving rotational weight closer to the center axis of the wheel allows it to complete a revolution with less energy exerted.

However, if you're tracking, you don't want a wheel so small that it limits your speed in areas of track to a speed that you could normally pass. This is hardly a fact worth considering unless you're driving a 6 second drag car, or want bragging rights of top speed (which is stupid and useless), as a 16" wheel will still allow the average car to reach into the 100s.
Zebman is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:49 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Kanchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,661
Default

was looking to go w/ the Rota-GAB knock offs but couldn't get them in any type of offset to fit, let alone diameter that would look decent. GL!
Kanchi is offline  


Quick Reply: anyone run 16x7 or 16x8s?



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 PM.