ClubRSX dissin TC's
#301
well hmm lets see 2.4 vs 2.0 id take the 2.4, but, 220hp 2.0 vs 160hp 2.4?? what happened, its so underpowered, they should have made one of the options a turbo kit like the imprezas
i know ill be happy if i join in, ill be back in the actual jdm scene, theres so much fake jdm here, because the tc is only usdm
i know ill be happy if i join in, ill be back in the actual jdm scene, theres so much fake jdm here, because the tc is only usdm
#302
Originally Posted by RSXaco
what, do you think its a downgrade?
If he wants an upgrade, get a used S2000, 350Z, IS300...etc
Originally Posted by rrimportracer
well hmm lets see 2.4 vs 2.0 id take the 2.4, but, 220hp 2.0 vs 160hp 2.4??
#303
Originally Posted by onefiend
Originally Posted by RSXaco
what, do you think its a downgrade?
If he wants an upgrade, get a used S2000, 350Z, IS300...etc
Originally Posted by rrimportracer
well hmm lets see 2.4 vs 2.0 id take the 2.4, but, 220hp 2.0 vs 160hp 2.4??
#304
Originally Posted by onefiend
Originally Posted by RSXaco
what, do you think its a downgrade?
If he wants an upgrade, get a used S2000, 350Z, IS300...etc
Originally Posted by rrimportracer
well hmm lets see 2.4 vs 2.0 id take the 2.4, but, 220hp 2.0 vs 160hp 2.4??
#306
Originally Posted by Nexis
There is a difference between a nut case using a car like that as a daily driver, and a car that takes little effort to drive on the wya to work every day.
#308
Originally Posted by MJVsTC
How did this thread make it to 16 pages?
#311
Originally Posted by Yanki01
Originally Posted by RSXaco
Originally Posted by onefiend
You think a type-S is an upgrade to your tC? You'll still be slow.
And why does everyone want this thread locked? It's mellowed down. If you guys cant handle reading what's on this thread, don't bother posting your thoughts.
And why does everyone want this thread locked? It's mellowed down. If you guys cant handle reading what's on this thread, don't bother posting your thoughts.
#313
lol - This is the never-ending post , keeps going and going and going and going...
793whp, daily driven?- Okay on a supra thats healthy, but on a 2.0- I-4 - FWD car thats just plain crazy, there goes practicality OUT the window...
793whp, daily driven?- Okay on a supra thats healthy, but on a 2.0- I-4 - FWD car thats just plain crazy, there goes practicality OUT the window...
#314
oook?
first most people on here talk trash about type-s's like...
"they'll blow with f/i, it can't handle that power, high compression, blah, blah"
"a turbo tC can smoke type-s's all day long"
but when something abnormal comes up, such as a 750+ whp in a 4cyl. then more trash talking and hating comes out
srt-4s can reach those numbers and they are fwd, but no one is trash talking those(besides the looks)
there's that 500+ tC in the mags, and i bet most people here say "i want to be like that someday"
so what's the problem?
please enlighten me
just because its in a "hon-duh" you guys be quick to judge
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
anything, i mean anything 500+ whp
first most people on here talk trash about type-s's like...
"they'll blow with f/i, it can't handle that power, high compression, blah, blah"
"a turbo tC can smoke type-s's all day long"
but when something abnormal comes up, such as a 750+ whp in a 4cyl. then more trash talking and hating comes out
srt-4s can reach those numbers and they are fwd, but no one is trash talking those(besides the looks)
there's that 500+ tC in the mags, and i bet most people here say "i want to be like that someday"
so what's the problem?
please enlighten me
just because its in a "hon-duh" you guys be quick to judge
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
anything, i mean anything 500+ whp
#315
i beleive the original poster on clubrsx was dissing the tc and many others followed along with him, so in that aspect you guys "started" it, and what didnt expect retaliation from our side that we would be silent, it works both ways...
#316
just because its a scion you guys be quick to judge
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
#317
Originally Posted by onefiend
It's pretty much the same car, small and slow. if you spend money to get 300hp on a type-S, goodluck resolving your traction problems. There are other cars out there that can be had and that would respond better to real power adding mods.
If he wants an upgrade, get a used S2000, 350Z, IS300...etc
If he wants an upgrade, get a used S2000, 350Z, IS300...etc
in my case, s2k and 350 is out because of it being a 2 seater
is300 is a 4DR and MUST be f/i to be fast
i'm a all motor guy myself
#318
Originally Posted by scion_jon
just because its a scion you guys be quick to judge
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
step outside of the box and realize that they put lots of money, research, and work to make it happen, give them credit
i'm not just being a fanbio, this goes for any car
you guys even trash fast rsx's