Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

scion TC+supercharger prices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2004 | 02:46 PM
  #41  
jlaznlover's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 933
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Straegen
personally im not much fan of the supercharger. yes it provides linear power. but i perfer a turbo setup. so i can stay out of boost and in vac. (use less gas
The torque off the line with a supercharger just can't be under-appreciated. Turbos are fine, but I would rather get in front of the guy and use my driving skills to keep him there. As a plus you don't get any turbolag with supercharges. I won't even get into which is easier to install. To make the arguement fair if you plan on "tweaking" the turbocharger to control boost, that would be a significant advantage. Supercharges can't do that (not easily anyway), but I am guessing that 99.9999% of the people that buy this car will never install a boost control system.

Gas to performance output supercharges often use less gas. Nail the throttle and they will consume more, but you are outputing significantly more power. Turbos are (as far as I know) always more effecient because they don't drain power to make power.

TRD S/C has no aftercooler/intercooler??
As a general rule supercharges do not need cooler technology. Unlike the significantly hotter turbocharger, supercharges remain relatively cool. It isn't until you start cranking up the PSI that you may need to start worrying about cooling. I would guess the TRD supercharger is not that juiced up.
yeah i guess you are right since the S/C will run low boost anyways, but i would prefer a aftercooler. since any type of compressed air is hotter. even more for a turbocharger since it exhaust driven. as for tweeking the S/C, only real thing you could do is get a smaller diameter wheel to give more boost.

hehe, obiviously the S/C is easier to install
Old 06-16-2004 | 02:52 PM
  #42  
ndiicx's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
From: Auburn AL
Default

according to my a dealer here the supercharger will be $3,500.12 or very close to that. Is that a little to steep for 50-55hp?
Old 06-16-2004 | 04:06 PM
  #43  
CervezA's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 316
From: S/W burb of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by ndiicx
according to my a dealer here the supercharger will be $3,500.12 or very close to that. Is that a little to steep for 50-55hp?
i'd say thats pretty fair for a 55hp boost (providing that its an "actual" 55hp gain). That with or w/out installation?
Old 06-16-2004 | 11:48 PM
  #44  
RoryC's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 87
From: Legacy Scion (FL)
Default

1886 is Tax, Tag, and Title.
Old 06-17-2004 | 12:42 AM
  #45  
ndiicx's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
From: Auburn AL
Default

thats b4 installation he said it would be real close to that amount. would a turbo charger be better?
Old 06-17-2004 | 04:17 AM
  #46  
CervezA's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 316
From: S/W burb of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by ndiicx
thats b4 installation he said it would be real close to that amount. would a turbo charger be better?
i'd say for a tuner, yes. If you're just looking for an overall power increase just go with the S/C. my opinion anyway..
Old 06-17-2004 | 11:06 PM
  #47  
Straegen's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 18
From: Woodstock, GA
Default

Turbocharges are just more complicated and to get a better power output requires staying at optimal RPMs. Not to mention you need to tweak them to match the driver/conditions for optimal output. Racers will often have a boost control system installed so they can change the way the turbo does what it does on the fly. S/Cs are linear. You hit the gas and you can feel it from start to finish. Don't need to be an expert to use that.

Stay with a supercharger unless you know what the difference is, under what conditions a turbocharger is actually better than a supercharger, you can actually use that difference, and you REALLY care about it.
Old 06-18-2004 | 04:35 AM
  #48  
jlaznlover's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 933
From: Orlando, FL
Default

i would say S/C are better for daily driving. T/C are more for maximum power in the highend. not as practical as a supercharger. its just a matter of preference on this one. there is not right or wrong answer. it really depends on what you will be doing with the car. if you are just using the car for just going to work, school, or just crusing. the S/C is the best bet. turbochargers, required more work to keep it running then the S/C. for instance, if you don't have a turbo timer installed, and you are driving on the highway and late for work. obviously you wont have time to drive around the block so the turbo can slow down(the turbo can spin in upwards of 100,00rpm). if you just turn off your car after running your engine pretty hard, the turbo can suffer oil starvation(no one wants that) and in due time the turbo might die prematurely due to poor maintainance. but with the S/C you have one less thing to worry about.
Old 06-20-2004 | 06:41 AM
  #49  
RyaN21's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 76
From: So Cal
Default

where did you guys here that the s/c will add 50-55 hp???
Old 06-20-2004 | 07:46 AM
  #50  
dj4monie's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 84
From: Reseda, Califorina
Default

Depending on what boost the superchager is running at the boost wil be linear.

In otherwords it won't give you big torque down low.

It will make the car much faster as the RPM's increase, which is more like a turbocharger.

That's basically that's all a centi___al (sp) superchargers are, a belt driven turbocharger.

For 55hp, I'd say they are running it around 4-5psi and most likely for warranty reasons. If you really want to push it, you can overdrive the blower alot more and get more out of it. You can prolly upgrade to Vortech's air to water intercooler kit as well.

Votech'ed Focus are making well over 200hp at the wheels with the intecooler and stock bottom end. SVT Focus make aroind 250-260hp with 7-8psi intercooled, so I know you can get more out of the tC kit if you want it.

Pricing is right inline with other forms of forced induction on other cars. The Scion shouldn't be treated any differently.
Old 06-20-2004 | 10:09 AM
  #51  
cornfield's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 288
Default

super charger sounds good.
Old 06-20-2004 | 03:46 PM
  #52  
Straegen's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 18
From: Woodstock, GA
Default

Originally Posted by dj4monie
Depending on what boost the superchager is running at the boost wil be linear.
Why would the boost have anything to do with how linear the power distribution from a supercharger is? The supercharger design itself can, but as a general rule S/C performance is linear.

Originally Posted by dj4monie
In otherwords it won't give you big torque down low.

It will make the car much faster as the RPM's increase, which is more like a turbocharger.

That's basically that's all a centi___al (sp) superchargers are, a belt driven turbocharger.
I fear it is centri___ul, but hope that it is a whipple. Has anyone seen the S/C in this car yet?
Old 06-29-2004 | 05:39 PM
  #53  
lakeshorescion's Avatar
Former Sponsor
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 141
From: Lake Shore Scion (IN)
Default

It is a Vortech, but with, I think, some input on the design by TRD.
Old 06-29-2004 | 06:51 PM
  #54  
Charisma's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by birdy
umm a 215hp coupe with as many features as the TC comes with stock is NOT BAD AT ALL for 21k

hell the mazda 3 only comes with 160 and nicely equipped its 20k
and it still beats the RSX also in speed prolly and its cheaper


Good guess... But your wrong. You don't just add 55 hp to the 160 that Toyota/Scion claims... That's how much power the motor is rated at. But by the time it gets to the ground its probably about 130-145, with the 55 hp from the supercharger your at about 180-205, that's just a bit above the RSX-s so yeah. You could hit 230 hp with a smaller supercharger pulley. But you'd be running more boost so it's dangerous.
Old 06-29-2004 | 06:58 PM
  #55  
Charisma's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Default

I'm thinking this motor will handle about 8-10 pounds of boost as a daily driver, with ALL stock internals. That would probably be about 90 horsepower added to about 135.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronado
Off-topic Cafe
4
10-20-2016 04:42 AM
TheTripleC
PPC: Vehicles
1
01-04-2015 07:46 PM
AbsoluteRedtC
PPC: Vehicles
3
12-31-2014 07:18 PM
JM Auto Racing
Exclusive Sponsored Sales
14
12-19-2014 07:36 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion iM Discussion Lounge
0
11-20-2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.