Notices

Req: Aggressive wheel stance pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2010 | 10:59 PM
  #4861  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,097
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

This isn't the tucked tC's thread. This is for tC's with wheels that protrude past their fenders.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:05 PM
  #4862  
Dwalkertc's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 246
Default

Camber = aggressive, tucked or not poke vs flush vs tucked is all style nice try tho

Originally Posted by Jon
This isn't the tucked tC's thread. This is for tC's with wheels that protrude past their fenders.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:10 PM
  #4863  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,097
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Lol did you even look through this thread? By your logic I can camber my stock wheels and that's aggressive. I can just delete your posts quick and simple like. Not a biggie.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:15 PM
  #4864  
Dwalkertc's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 246
Default

Camber increases grip, that is what makes it aggressive. Thats like saying this isn't an aggressive stance and this is hella tucked. Honestly mods are destroying this site why it has been dieing over the last several months:

Name:  p1040488.jpg
Views: 145
Size:  22.6 KB

And that is just the car i was reading about on stance nation... if you would like i can post a ton of aggressive stances off any number of sites... we aren't Vortex here come on mod give me a break with the threats

Originally Posted by Jon
Lol did you even look through this thread? By your logic I can camber my stock wheels and that's aggressive. I can just delete your posts quick and simple like. Not a biggie.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:16 PM
  #4865  
dropzone's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,878
From: Central TX
Default

Originally Posted by Jon
This isn't the tucked tC's thread. This is for tC's with wheels that protrude past their fenders.
x2. Not exclusive to wheels protruding the fenders but +40 offset wheels need not apply, now add spacers.... but yea Dwalkertc, wrong thread man.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:28 PM
  #4866  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,097
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Dwalkertc
Camber increases grip, that is what makes it aggressive. Thats like saying this isn't an aggressive stance and this is hella tucked. Honestly mods are destroying this site why it has been dieing over the last several months:

And that is just the car i was reading about on stance nation... if you would like i can post a ton of aggressive stances off any number of sites... we aren't Vortex here come on mod give me a break with the threats
I'm not picking on you, I'm just stating the facts because apparently you don't understand what this thread is about.



Do you see how his tire tread and wheel lip are visible from the rear of the car? That's because they go past the fender. The camber is to make the tire fit without rubbing and to keep the wheel from banging up the fender. Your wheels don't do that. They go up into the fender well. Like I said before, that's not what this thread is about. Otherwise we wouldn't need a separate thread for tucked tCs now would we?

Also, when you're talking about this amount of camber, I don't know why you think that increases grip when you're taking part of the tread off the road.

And you're right, this isn't Vortex. They would have ripped you to shreds for posting something off topic.

Edit: Here's a better example since this guy is on air as well.



^That is aggressive.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:44 PM
  #4867  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Dwalkertc
Camber = aggressive, tucked or not poke vs flush vs tucked is all style nice try tho
Just stop.
your completely wrong.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:51 PM
  #4868  
DJ08tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,159
From: Spotsylvania, VA
Default

*you're

sorry i had too. lol carry on
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:51 PM
  #4869  
dropzone's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,878
From: Central TX
Default

^this came to mind

lmao
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:00 AM
  #4870  
RS2_1823's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 848
From: Slower Dover, DE
Default

^^ exactly lmao
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:32 AM
  #4871  
Dwalkertc's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 246
Default

I understand most euro stance enthusiasts are aiming for there lip of the rim to sit as close to the fender as possible. Sweet cool deal I dunno about you guys but last i checked we drive a domestic version of the camry. Yes i said it, we don't have a sister in Japan that is right hand drive but it is what it is.

In true JDM there's what is known as tsuraichi or to become one. That is the style that you are talking about, bit of camber with a flush transition between quarter panel and rim.

What everyone considers as aggressive is an opinion some times you will read a car has an aggressive stance because of how outrageous the setup is. Or on a polar opposite of a stylish car you can have an aggressive stance based on grip and performance. This isn't slamming your vehicle this is for handling if it can get them an ounce better of grip they will do it.

I had a discussion with the first body dropped GLI, know him in real life and went camping with him last year. Aggressive stance is all perspective, he considers his stance to be "cute" because he chose to sit his wheels upright. I've never heard of a "cute" stance and you won't find it out there on the internet. Get over it there are no clear lines between what is aggressive and what isn't there are just 3 styles... poked flush and tucked. So if your VIP status and have your rims **** eyed on the inside or hella flush with that same camber sitting the arches on the rim lip cool deal it's your style.

BTW found out hellaflush came from california... go figure?

Thats my opinion and until I can find
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:47 AM
  #4872  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,097
From: Atlanta, GA
Default



Without dissecting every part of your post, I'll just say this: If you need to imagine the title of this thread is "Flush and Poked tCs," then you do that. The fact remains, this thread still isn't for tucked tCs.

Last edited by Jon; 11-09-2010 at 01:01 AM.
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:55 AM
  #4873  
BlkTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,725
Default

go talk to iheartzombies.. his car is probably lower or just as low as yours, but has camber with wheels and fitment NOT SUITABLE FOR THIS THREAD!! hence, the lack of pictures of his awesome car IN this thread.. now... just kinda go to page 243, go to the very bottom, and delete that post you posted. <3

weeeeeeeeee
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:59 AM
  #4874  
BlkTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,725
Default

Originally Posted by DJ08tC
*you're

sorry i had too. lol carry on
*to

LOL
Old 11-09-2010 | 01:04 AM
  #4875  
BlkTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,725
Default

damnit, okay i have to post ONE MORE TIME!!

jon, can you edit that first post for noobs like this guy..

just edit it so it says, "THIS THREAD IS FOR TC'S WITH WHEELS SO WIDE CAMBER AND STRETCHED TIRES ARE NECESSARY FOR THE WHEELS TO FIT THE CAR..

P.S.
NOT FOR TC'S ON AIR DUMPED TO THE GROUND WITH SUNKEN BATTLESHIP WHEELS"
Old 11-09-2010 | 01:23 AM
  #4876  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,097
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Maybe the OP needs width-to-offset requirements. For example, for a 7" wide wheel, your [effective] offset must be ≤ 25mm.
Old 11-09-2010 | 01:46 AM
  #4877  
davedavetC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20,410
Default

dwalker i mean your somewhat local to me, and i dont like to put down locals but your wrong, if you wanna see aggressive fitment i'll be more then happy to throw my AME's back on for a day and meet up with you so you can get a real life view on some wrong fitment. but seriously man just because youre on air and the wheels are cambered like whoa doesnt make it aggressive, its tucked. just like you said "Get over it there are no clear lines between what is aggressive and what isn't there are just 3 styles... poked flush and tucked."

except the sheer fact that there is VERY clear lines and youre on the far side with tucked and this thread is for the far side with poked and flush.

your car is cool and all but its just not built for this thread.... maybe one day, but not today, and mostlikely not tomorrow either.
Old 11-09-2010 | 02:04 AM
  #4878  
Dwalkertc's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by davedavetC
except the sheer fact that there is VERY clear lines and youre on the far side with tucked and this thread is for the far side with poked and flush.
I understand that maybe I posted on here a bit early and yes I'm still sitting on thin rims at 8.5" I just finished getting the car drivable again and am not pulling the chassis off so I can be the first unibody drop, saying that isn't an aggressive stance when you have no where to put the wheels but in your well after tubbed is nuts

And before i get flamed at for wanting to go mangle my frame I lay pinch now. I have no real other choice but to tub and cut.
Old 11-09-2010 | 02:08 AM
  #4879  
09SocalTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,069
From: Torrance, CA/ North Hollyhood, CA/ Outer Space
Default

Originally Posted by Dwalkertc
Camber increases grip, that is what makes it aggressive. Thats like saying this isn't an aggressive stance and this is hella tucked. Honestly mods are destroying this site why it has been dieing over the last several months:
you are so wrong on so many levels...
Old 11-09-2010 | 02:43 AM
  #4880  
davedavetC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20,410
Default

Originally Posted by Dwalkertc
I understand that maybe I posted on here a bit early and yes I'm still sitting on thin rims at 8.5" I just finished getting the car drivable again and am not pulling the chassis off so I can be the first unibody drop, saying that isn't an aggressive stance when you have no where to put the wheels but in your well after tubbed is nuts

And before i get flamed at for wanting to go mangle my frame I lay pinch now. I have no real other choice but to tub and cut.
youre getting it mixed up, its an aggressive drop, not stance.

stance and aggressive fitment fall into place when the wheels AND drop are working in unison to great an aggressive stance.

just because your on air (which is cheating btw ) and you can slam your car to the ground doesnt make it aggressive, there are people out there that are driving their cars daily on coils like that, but if their wheels dont fit right (or wrong depending on who you talk to) then the car is not stanced.

you got the drop, now post when you get the wheels. its a multi stage process.


clift notes. you cant have stance without proper wheels.


Quick Reply: Req: Aggressive wheel stance pics



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM.