stock wheel 17" 215/225?
#1
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 501
stock wheel 17" 215/225?
Which would you guys recommend for supercharged TC.... 215/45/17 or 225/45/17? I really like how the 215s seem like the most optimal size tire and I believe they rotate easier than 225s would...
Sorry for the new post, I have looked at all the others and seen that most prefer the 225s but I would kind of like an explaination as to why the 225s would be better?
Sorry for the new post, I have looked at all the others and seen that most prefer the 225s but I would kind of like an explaination as to why the 225s would be better?
#2
I only have a CAI, but I put 225s on mine. The 225s felt a little more sure-footed in whatever you drive through. You end up with more rubber on the road at any given time since they're wider. I like the way they look on the rim too, a little more sidewall and cushion because of that.
#3
225s, no question. The 225s will have only a slightly taller sidewall (4.5mm) but will have a 10mm wider traction patch. The overall size difference isn't enough to throw anything electronic too far out of whack, and the width isn't wide enough for rubbing issues. And, they're typically about the same price.
#5
Re: stock wheel 17" 215/225?
Originally Posted by KiKaZ-sC
I really like how the 215s seem like the most optimal size tire...
It's my opinion that everyone should do whatever makes them happy, that neither answer is necessarily "right" or "wrong", only that the 215 is in fact more optimal for the stock wheels.
#7
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 501
track use...
I plan on running at the Streets of Willow in Rosamond, California sometime in June. So which size would be best for that type of track?
the topic is 215 vs 225? but I was also wondering what you guys think of the Falken Azenis rt615 vs Kumho MX?
the topic is 215 vs 225? but I was also wondering what you guys think of the Falken Azenis rt615 vs Kumho MX?
#8
You'll be fine with either, however steering response with the 615 or MX 225/45R17 should be about the same or better than 215/45R17 due to reinforced sidewalls. I presume you're running at a high performance driving event and not racing, so I wouldn't expect there to be a remarkable difference between the Falkens or the Kumhos. However, I chose 225 Falkens because the tread width is almost the same as a comparable 235.
#9
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 501
Originally Posted by 2fast4you
I chose 225 Falkens because the tread width is almost the same as a comparable 235.
If this is TRUE, I will be staying with 215s but going with the Azenis because of the wider tread width!
#10
Originally Posted by KiKaZ-sC
Does that mean the Falkens rt615 usually run wider tread width than other brands? So, does this mean the Falken 215s would be wider than other brand 215s? Would it be comparable to a 225 in tread width with say the Kumhos?
#11
All things being equal, 215/225s will work - BUT, when you put bigger rubber on the rims, they weigh more.
Unsprung weight is something racers try to reduce with expensive light rims, lighter rotors, etc.
I'd have to say that for the track, the same tire in a smaller size might be the best way to go.
It's more complex than can be answered here, but being general, that's my 2¢
Unsprung weight is something racers try to reduce with expensive light rims, lighter rotors, etc.
I'd have to say that for the track, the same tire in a smaller size might be the best way to go.
It's more complex than can be answered here, but being general, that's my 2¢
#12
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 501
Originally Posted by 2fast4you
Yes to all, however 215s don't have reinforced sidewalls so you could be giving up a little cornering stability. Again, if you're not racing, it shouldn't be a remarkable difference.
#13
Originally Posted by KiKaZ-sC
Well... it's still an Falken Azenis which should have a stiffer sidewall than the Kumho's regardless of whether it is reinforced or not right...
#14
Originally Posted by SciontCya
All things being equal, 215/225s will work - BUT, when you put bigger rubber on the rims, they weigh more.
Unsprung weight is something racers try to reduce with expensive light rims, lighter rotors, etc.
I'd have to say that for the track, the same tire in a smaller size might be the best way to go.
It's more complex than can be answered here, but being general, that's my 2¢
Unsprung weight is something racers try to reduce with expensive light rims, lighter rotors, etc.
I'd have to say that for the track, the same tire in a smaller size might be the best way to go.
It's more complex than can be answered here, but being general, that's my 2¢
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darkshadowofxdeath
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2
12-03-2014 06:59 PM