PTUNING: 2011 Scion tC Turbo Kit (Available to ship)
#81
Hey its what we do on SL! Now all we need is another newb thread asking why his auto up/down windows and sunroof dont work after disconnecting the battery!
Now where is some pics of P-tuning awesomeness! I need to put this drool to use!
Now where is some pics of P-tuning awesomeness! I need to put this drool to use!
#83
And you won't find them nor I in Redline Time Attack in 2011 either as RTA has moved all their events to the West Coast because they are some sell-outs../rant.
#84
ah that sucks... west coast huh? too bad i live all the way out in california... oh wait! jk that does suck for a lot of teams. and really doesnt make much sense. but are they still racing? in ANY type of event? not including any drag strip stuff
#87
#91
Based on the dyno numbers posted, it is underrated. They only claim 180hp at the crank from the factory. Even the first gen tC was rated at 160hp from the factory right. Strap it to a dynojet, it don't put down 160whp, it puts down like 130-140whp. Strap the tC2 to the dynojet and it puts down 180whp like they stated it would for the crank.
Understand now why it's being said that it's underrated?
Taking a DynoJet into account here:
DynoJet
tC 1
Factory = 160 (162)hp.
Dyno = 130-140whp
tC 2
Factory = 180hp
Dyno = 180whp
It's not that hard to follow. If you want to go by the PTuning Dyno Dynamics dyno fine, but same thing still applies when you factor in the % difference between the DD and the Dynojet.
Understand now why it's being said that it's underrated?
Taking a DynoJet into account here:
DynoJet
tC 1
Factory = 160 (162)hp.
Dyno = 130-140whp
tC 2
Factory = 180hp
Dyno = 180whp
It's not that hard to follow. If you want to go by the PTuning Dyno Dynamics dyno fine, but same thing still applies when you factor in the % difference between the DD and the Dynojet.
has there even been a Dynojet graph of the tc2 posted? or are you just speculating?
DynoDynamics (ptunings dyno)
tC 1
Factory = 160 (162)hp.
Dyno = 140-146whp (according to ptuning on post #25 on their dyno)
tC 2
Factory = 180hp
Dyno = 159whp (again on ptuning dyno)
so how do you still figure its underrated?
seems like on their dyno the tc2 only has 13-19 more HP which would mean its not underrated.
#94
has there even been a Dynojet graph of the tc2 posted? or are you just speculating?
DynoDynamics (ptunings dyno)
tC 1
Factory = 160 (162)hp.
Dyno = 140-146whp (according to ptuning on post #25 on their dyno)
tC 2
Factory = 180hp
Dyno = 159whp (again on ptuning dyno)
so how do you still figure its underrated?
seems like on their dyno the tc2 only has 13-19 more HP which would mean its not underrated.
DynoDynamics (ptunings dyno)
tC 1
Factory = 160 (162)hp.
Dyno = 140-146whp (according to ptuning on post #25 on their dyno)
tC 2
Factory = 180hp
Dyno = 159whp (again on ptuning dyno)
so how do you still figure its underrated?
seems like on their dyno the tc2 only has 13-19 more HP which would mean its not underrated.
Current Issue of DSport Magazine. Full Article including dyno test on a DynoJet dyno. Numbers tested 180.11whp. Est. Crank HP 200-211hp.
PTuning dyno = roughly 15% lower reading than Dynojet dyno's (posted back on the subsequent pages). 159whp PTuning dyno + 15% = 180ish whp Dynojet.
I choose to agree to disagree after this point if you still making an opposition about it. Lets move the debate forward and look to see what a boosted tC2 with PTuning surgery can do.
#95
Yep, no need to "speculate" when it's already posted.
Not to sure what you find funny....LOL. Jokes not on me. I don't speculate, figured you would have been around long enough to know this.
#96
^since we dont have Dsport Mags TC1 dynojet numbers from the very same dyno, it cant really be used as a comparison.
im taking ptunings dyno as a better comparison since they have dynoed both in very similar conditions (being theirs is indoors and climate controlled)
you cant deny they are in a better position to compare dyno numbers, which means the tc2 is not underated.
again, no sense in arguing since i will never own one and even if it does have 200+ crank hp (like everyone seems to believe) its still slow, lol
looking forward to boosted numbers to make this bad-boy quick!
im taking ptunings dyno as a better comparison since they have dynoed both in very similar conditions (being theirs is indoors and climate controlled)
you cant deny they are in a better position to compare dyno numbers, which means the tc2 is not underated.
again, no sense in arguing since i will never own one and even if it does have 200+ crank hp (like everyone seems to believe) its still slow, lol
looking forward to boosted numbers to make this bad-boy quick!
#97
LOL
#98
^since we dont have Dsport Mags TC1 dynojet numbers from the very same dyno, it cant really be used as a comparison.
im taking ptunings dyno as a better comparison since they have dynoed both in very similar conditions (being theirs is indoors and climate controlled)
you cant deny they are in a better position to compare dyno numbers, which means the tc2 is not underated.
again, no sense in arguing since i will never own one and even if it does have 200+ crank hp (like everyone seems to believe) its still slow, lol
looking forward to boosted numbers to make this bad-boy quick!
im taking ptunings dyno as a better comparison since they have dynoed both in very similar conditions (being theirs is indoors and climate controlled)
you cant deny they are in a better position to compare dyno numbers, which means the tc2 is not underated.
again, no sense in arguing since i will never own one and even if it does have 200+ crank hp (like everyone seems to believe) its still slow, lol
looking forward to boosted numbers to make this bad-boy quick!
Dude, I'm done. Call it whatever you want, I'll call it underrated.