Converting my Scion xA to Electric..
#21
EPA has been researching a hybrid that adds $600 to manufacturing cost but gives you this:
Test vehicle is mid-sized sedan ,3800lbs ---
70% savings on brake system wear
30%-40% increase in acceleration performance
50%-60% fuel economy increase
Final test drive equivilent to 80MPG with full passanger load and A/C on in test vehicle. while improving 0-60MPH time to 8sec.Link is below, but technology is in use with fleet of 10 UPS vehicles. Converting a FWD automobile would simply require installing rear transaxle plus hydraulic system. This also converts to RWD operation during acceleration, xA wheelie would be cool!!! System actually reclaims kinetic energy lost during braking, and hydraulic systems are 85%-90% efficient.
Test vehicle is mid-sized sedan ,3800lbs ---
70% savings on brake system wear
30%-40% increase in acceleration performance
50%-60% fuel economy increase
Final test drive equivilent to 80MPG with full passanger load and A/C on in test vehicle. while improving 0-60MPH time to 8sec.Link is below, but technology is in use with fleet of 10 UPS vehicles. Converting a FWD automobile would simply require installing rear transaxle plus hydraulic system. This also converts to RWD operation during acceleration, xA wheelie would be cool!!! System actually reclaims kinetic energy lost during braking, and hydraulic systems are 85%-90% efficient.
#22
Originally Posted by thwang99
Originally Posted by DarkBoxJr
Why?
If anything, do this for the "I own the only electric xA" reason, otherwise you're just kidding yourself.
#24
What kind of MPG do we get on our gas Scions?
Versus the "proposed 34 Miles on EV"...
The idea of a Hybrid or pure EV xA, sounds great...but the rewards dont sound like they come up all the good.
Versus the "proposed 34 Miles on EV"...
The idea of a Hybrid or pure EV xA, sounds great...but the rewards dont sound like they come up all the good.
#25
Don't you think the hydraulic hybrid, as presented by the EPA , that doubles current MPG while improving acceleration by 30% and reduces brake wear 70%, are reward enough to add $600 to production costs?
#26
Uh huh....going back to my original question. What's the total amount being spent to "retrofit" the xA to be an EV?
I dont care about increased braking...people are still going to drive like idiots. :/
I dont care about increased braking...people are still going to drive like idiots. :/
#27
Originally Posted by Dwatts5250
Uh huh....going back to my original question. What's the total amount being spent to "retrofit" the xA to be an EV?
I dont care about increased braking...people are still going to drive like idiots. :/
I dont care about increased braking...people are still going to drive like idiots. :/
#28
Well, that's not too bad. Anything over 25k tho....then its starts to look alittle less appitizing. But I'd like to see the project when its done. Anything but a Priuus...looks like a roach on wheels.
#29
Dwatts5250. Carefully read my post closely, the term is Hydraulic hybrid and has nothing to do with hydrogen,fuel cells, batteries or electric motors - check out the link in my quote below....retrofit will double MPG and boost acceleration 30% - 40% cost is @ $600 - EV systems are expensive and reclaiming retrofit expense through fuel savings is improbable. Link is to EPA website and they boast that hydraulic hybrids = "A Proven Approach"!!
#31
Originally Posted by thwang99
Originally Posted by Neothin
34 miles to a charge? that's kinda cruddy.
As for costs, too much! The technology is still more expensive than an ICE setup, plus it's all custom work.
All this to go 0-60 in MAYBE 8-9 seconds? Even trying to justify it by being a "cool" project . xA is a "neat" little car. I have one because it is already economical. For that kind of money you can buy a used prius and figure out how to turbocharge it.
Good luck guy, hopefully you can make me eat my words.
#32
You're kidding about the camera, right? ;) Electricity to power a video camera & LCD is VERY VERY little compared to the amount needed to move the car. Even headlights which take an order of magnitude more energy won't make a difference too. AC and heating will, though (same as a gas car, though in a gas car the heater is "always on").
The pollution from electrical generation per mile is MUCH less compared to gas per mile. Common misconception. And if you consider oil well to wheel pollution, it's even a bigger difference. For each gallon of gas, you also have to add in pollution caused by extracting the gas, and transporting the gas, refining the gas, etc.
The electric grid is becoming cleaner every year, as renewable generation sources come online (hydro, wind, cleaner generators, better technologies, etc).
But yeah, the range definitely sucks compared to a gas car. It's definitely going to be a in town car . 90% of the time, the range will be fine (commuting, groceries, visiting friends in town, etc). The other 10%, we have our gas car. If we can get mileage up to say, 120 miles per charge, it should cover everything except out of town long trips, which may be like once or twice a month, hopefully.
It would be great if EVs could get say, a 600 mile range. That should cover a day's worth of driving, assuming you could charge at night in your hotel room, etc, on long trips. A 2000 mile range would be awesome, it would cover the times you can't charge and let u drive a few full days without charging. Hopefully someday battery technology will get there! Battery capacity is improving each year, but at a much slower pace than Moore's law.
- Tony
Actually I think I can get closer to 40 to 50 miles now, but yeah, that's just initially, with a small battery pack (around 200 pounds?). I plan on at least doubling the pack later on (when finances allow!). Most EV conversions have a 1000 pound battery pack (http://www.evalbum.com). My goal is 120 mile range, but I'd be happy with 80.
As for costs, too much! The technology is still more expensive than an ICE setup, plus it's all custom work.
So you are decreasing your range from about almost 400 miles per tank to 45-ish per day, want to add cameras and monitor instead of mirrors (more electricity= less milage), doubling the price of your car, drastically decreasing the resale value of your car, and don't think that the elecricity from the wall socket isn't comming from a pollution creating source like a fossil fuel burning power plant or nuclear waste producing power plant?
All this to go 0-60 in MAYBE 8-9 seconds? Even trying to justify it by being a "cool" project . xA is a "neat" little car. I have one because it is already economical. For that kind of money you can buy a used prius and figure out how to turbocharge it.
Good luck guy, hopefully you can make me eat my words.
The pollution from electrical generation per mile is MUCH less compared to gas per mile. Common misconception. And if you consider oil well to wheel pollution, it's even a bigger difference. For each gallon of gas, you also have to add in pollution caused by extracting the gas, and transporting the gas, refining the gas, etc.
The electric grid is becoming cleaner every year, as renewable generation sources come online (hydro, wind, cleaner generators, better technologies, etc).
But yeah, the range definitely sucks compared to a gas car. It's definitely going to be a in town car . 90% of the time, the range will be fine (commuting, groceries, visiting friends in town, etc). The other 10%, we have our gas car. If we can get mileage up to say, 120 miles per charge, it should cover everything except out of town long trips, which may be like once or twice a month, hopefully.
It would be great if EVs could get say, a 600 mile range. That should cover a day's worth of driving, assuming you could charge at night in your hotel room, etc, on long trips. A 2000 mile range would be awesome, it would cover the times you can't charge and let u drive a few full days without charging. Hopefully someday battery technology will get there! Battery capacity is improving each year, but at a much slower pace than Moore's law.
- Tony
Originally Posted by tc_is_for_turbo_charged
Originally Posted by thwang99
Originally Posted by Neothin
34 miles to a charge? that's kinda cruddy.
As for costs, too much! The technology is still more expensive than an ICE setup, plus it's all custom work.
All this to go 0-60 in MAYBE 8-9 seconds? Even trying to justify it by being a "cool" project . xA is a "neat" little car. I have one because it is already economical. For that kind of money you can buy a used prius and figure out how to turbocharge it.
Good luck guy, hopefully you can make me eat my words.
#33
Originally Posted by SatsumaxA
Dwatts5250. Carefully read my post closely, the term is Hydraulic hybrid and has nothing to do with hydrogen,fuel cells, batteries or electric motors - check out the link in my quote below....retrofit will double MPG and boost acceleration 30% - 40% cost is @ $600 - EV systems are expensive and reclaiming retrofit expense through fuel savings is improbable. Link is to EPA website and they boast that hydraulic hybrids = "A Proven Approach"!!
#37
Originally Posted by oldmanatee
Why do I keep getting a picture of someone with an electric ar knocking on their friends door for a visit with a bottle of wine in one hand and an extension cord in the other?
#38
Originally Posted by SatsumaxA
Don't you think the hydraulic hybrid, as presented by the EPA , that doubles current MPG while improving acceleration by 30% and reduces brake wear 70%, are reward enough to add $600 to production costs?
could you use your 'homemade' hybrid or electric as a tax credit when you file your annual income taxes?
#40
I say, good luck Bro! The more people who try to make gasoline-alterative cars work, real-world style, the more we will learn, the better we'll be at it and the less dependent we will be on oil. Obviously elimination is not an option, but we can lessen our use.