Power Enterprise SP OR Blitz SP
07-20-2007, 06:03 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 32
Power Enterprise SP OR Blitz SP
Hey folks! I am enterested in getting a SP kit for my box. I am leaning more toward the Power Enterprise kit one of the main reason is its proven 40% gain. I am also looking toward the Blitz kit. Which gives the most boost and power to the wheels? If any One has either of these kets I would be glad to here your opinions on them! Thanks guys!
07-21-2007, 04:55 AM
#2
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 1,301
I am in the same boat as you-I am thinking the SC way is easier than turbo and you can still add a header for more gain at the same time.
I would question the GReddy against these as well and then I am also wondering if any of these kits are more or less adaptable to an intercooler than the others?
I would question the GReddy against these as well and then I am also wondering if any of these kits are more or less adaptable to an intercooler than the others?
07-21-2007, 07:53 AM
#3
Superchargers are no good on a B. Why would your want something that takes power to make power. A supercharger will take about 10% power from the motor just to get boost. You will get alot more power out of a turbo.
07-24-2007, 05:09 AM
#5
Senior Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 381
Originally Posted by sizzlinscion
Superchargers are no good on a B. Why would your want something that takes power to make power. A supercharger will take about 10% power from the motor just to get boost. You will get alot more power out of a turbo.
07-25-2007, 04:57 PM
#6
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 766
Originally Posted by sizzlinscion
Superchargers are no good on a B. Why would your want something that takes power to make power. A supercharger will take about 10% power from the motor just to get boost. You will get alot more power out of a turbo.
07-25-2007, 05:10 PM
#7
You wont lose power but you wont gain much. A supercharger takes power to make power, and the 5lbs. of boost that they produce is nothing. You would be alot happier with a turbo and you will see alot more power gains with it.
07-25-2007, 06:16 PM
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by sizzlinscion
You wont lose power but you wont gain much. A supercharger takes power to make power, and the 5lbs. of boost that they produce is nothing. You would be alot happier with a turbo and you will see alot more power gains with it.
07-25-2007, 07:16 PM
#9
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 766
I run the blitz supercharger and i dynoed higher than Blown xA and Tangos xB Greddy turbo untill they upgrade and tune their turbo. so out of the box, blitz dyno's a tad more. Turbo has more potential but theres nothing wrong with putting superchargers on an xB.
07-25-2007, 08:39 PM
#10
Senior Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 381
Originally Posted by sizzlinscion
You wont lose power but you wont gain much. A supercharger takes power to make power, and the 5lbs. of boost that they produce is nothing. You would be alot happier with a turbo and you will see alot more power gains with it.
07-25-2007, 09:02 PM
#11
pressure is pressure sure....
the engine will benefit from boost either way but why tear your motor up by supercharging it when you can turbo it and get alot better response from boostring your motor...
turbos load the engine evenly, a supercharger loads the end of the crankshaft up. the turbo is taking wasted energy to provide boost where the supercharger is creating resistance in the bottom end of the motor to provide boost.
a turbo loads all of the engines internal bit more evenly then a supercharger, therefor a turbo would be better for a motor period. a supercharger is probably better for tuning simplicity but not necessarily reliability.
the engine will benefit from boost either way but why tear your motor up by supercharging it when you can turbo it and get alot better response from boostring your motor...
turbos load the engine evenly, a supercharger loads the end of the crankshaft up. the turbo is taking wasted energy to provide boost where the supercharger is creating resistance in the bottom end of the motor to provide boost.
a turbo loads all of the engines internal bit more evenly then a supercharger, therefor a turbo would be better for a motor period. a supercharger is probably better for tuning simplicity but not necessarily reliability.
07-25-2007, 09:18 PM
#12
Senior Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 381
Originally Posted by sizzlinscion
pressure is pressure sure....
the engine will benefit from boost either way but why tear your motor up by supercharging it when you can turbo it and get alot better response from boostring your motor...
turbos load the engine evenly, a supercharger loads the end of the crankshaft up. the turbo is taking wasted energy to provide boost where the supercharger is creating resistance in the bottom end of the motor to provide boost.
a turbo loads all of the engines internal bit more evenly then a supercharger, therefor a turbo would be better for a motor period. a supercharger is probably better for tuning simplicity but not necessarily reliability.
the engine will benefit from boost either way but why tear your motor up by supercharging it when you can turbo it and get alot better response from boostring your motor...
turbos load the engine evenly, a supercharger loads the end of the crankshaft up. the turbo is taking wasted energy to provide boost where the supercharger is creating resistance in the bottom end of the motor to provide boost.
a turbo loads all of the engines internal bit more evenly then a supercharger, therefor a turbo would be better for a motor period. a supercharger is probably better for tuning simplicity but not necessarily reliability.
