got camber
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by LVScionGal
Gee I wonder if I knew you'd be here or if it was a lucky guess!! lol
Im seriously considering this but I'll PM you the details so you know what I mean.
Thanks!!
Im seriously considering this but I'll PM you the details so you know what I mean.
Thanks!!
#47
Originally Posted by SciFly
I think my next move is to tune the newly installed Tein Basics' spring rates. Along with this I'll be trimming my camber... adding some negative camber by use of Eibach cambering bolts in the front strut lower mounts. (Idea suggested to me by Brian Sorenson)
That is, I will be TUNING my suspension for flatter cornering. This means: replace the Tein's standard springs with stiffer rates. And careful! addition of neg. camber to the front. Very possibly I'll be -reducing- the rear camber but not for any "demon" reason. I'm not nearly on that edge yet.
The car is very tractable as it stands today with heavy rear camber and a lot of body roll on these Tein Basic's -soft- standard springs.
That is, I will be TUNING my suspension for flatter cornering. This means: replace the Tein's standard springs with stiffer rates. And careful! addition of neg. camber to the front. Very possibly I'll be -reducing- the rear camber but not for any "demon" reason. I'm not nearly on that edge yet.
The car is very tractable as it stands today with heavy rear camber and a lot of body roll on these Tein Basic's -soft- standard springs.
#48
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Originally Posted by JDMJim
Originally Posted by SciFly
I think my next move is to tune the newly installed Tein Basics' spring rates. Along with this I'll be trimming my camber... adding some negative camber by use of Eibach cambering bolts in the front strut lower mounts. (Idea suggested to me by Brian Sorenson)
That is, I will be TUNING my suspension for flatter cornering. This means: replace the Tein's standard springs with stiffer rates. And careful! addition of neg. camber to the front. Very possibly I'll be -reducing- the rear camber but not for any "demon" reason. I'm not nearly on that edge yet.
The car is very tractable as it stands today with heavy rear camber and a lot of body roll on these Tein Basic's -soft- standard springs.
That is, I will be TUNING my suspension for flatter cornering. This means: replace the Tein's standard springs with stiffer rates. And careful! addition of neg. camber to the front. Very possibly I'll be -reducing- the rear camber but not for any "demon" reason. I'm not nearly on that edge yet.
The car is very tractable as it stands today with heavy rear camber and a lot of body roll on these Tein Basic's -soft- standard springs.
#54
Jim, you wondered:
They are pretty surely the same shocks as used in the Super Street, only lacking the adjustable restriction in the main circuit. Hmmm... I will ask them to be sure though. Thanks, Reid
Mighty fine, mighty fine looking... and you're funny, too. GREAT picture!
to drifters: I wonder how much neg camber I need in front. Experience and my own taste will tell in time. OTG rear camber is -3 and this makes the rear really steer around a sharp turn. There's not so much understeer as before. If I camber the front wheels heavily too I may be into this mode (neat quote):
Indeed, 'possums! Indeed! said Dame Edna, victim of way too much Demon Camber
in "her" own tuning
just having fun now.
i love that picture... -4.5
Well, Joey, so do I. For you, a lame verse
about camber steering past the outer limits
I hadda B wit' camber ,
so cool and looking super tucked.
But when I steered too quick one day
it oversteered. Oh crap! I'm ----ed!
?
I hope so
Now I don't know a lot about Tein and their damping rates of their shocks. But be careful about installing stiffer springs on a "basic" system. Shocks may not hold up as well.
Originally Posted by hahajoey
yeah thats my box. i dont have big lips..
just have whatever sized lips..
i just run spacers and shims and get them flush..
just have whatever sized lips..
i just run spacers and shims and get them flush..
to drifters: I wonder how much neg camber I need in front. Experience and my own taste will tell in time. OTG rear camber is -3 and this makes the rear really steer around a sharp turn. There's not so much understeer as before. If I camber the front wheels heavily too I may be into this mode (neat quote):
Originally Posted by TXboxdriverw (with my own playing off with with the font colors)
i read an interesting article on Jtuned.com with Nobuteru (JGTC driver)
he had intersting comments semi-relative to this thread
J2N: What is your most memorable automotive experience?
***: My most memorable automotive experience is with my 4th Hachi-roku. I loved that car to death. For me it was the car that I can control freely as I commanded. The setup was perfect. But back in the day, there was a time when something called “Oni-can” (translated “demon camber”) was popular. “Oni-can” is when you apply obscene amounts of negative camber. I tried this and ended up totaling the car near my neighborhood while drifting. I never liked the look in the first place, but now I know never to do it again.
hahaha YEAH!!
DEMON CAMBER!!!!!!
he had intersting comments semi-relative to this thread
J2N: What is your most memorable automotive experience?
***: My most memorable automotive experience is with my 4th Hachi-roku. I loved that car to death. For me it was the car that I can control freely as I commanded. The setup was perfect. But back in the day, there was a time when something called “Oni-can” (translated “demon camber”) was popular. “Oni-can” is when you apply obscene amounts of negative camber. I tried this and ended up totaling the car near my neighborhood while drifting. I never liked the look in the first place, but now I know never to do it again.
hahaha YEAH!!
DEMON CAMBER!!!!!!
in "her" own tuning
just having fun now.
Originally Posted by hahajoey
i love that picture... -4.5
about camber steering past the outer limits
I hadda B wit' camber ,
so cool and looking super tucked.
But when I steered too quick one day
it oversteered. Oh crap! I'm ----ed!
?
I hope so
#57
for sure the added negative camber didn't improve
my steering, cornering or anything.
in fact it limited it(in my opinion).
but considering we drive econoboxes
that are bascially echo's with a diff shell..
i dont think anyone should be "handling all crazy"
anyways.
my steering, cornering or anything.
in fact it limited it(in my opinion).
but considering we drive econoboxes
that are bascially echo's with a diff shell..
i dont think anyone should be "handling all crazy"
anyways.
#58
oh yeah. when i used to corner, it handled a lot better.
i do however, prefer the look/stance of the added camber.
if i can have it "any" way i want, i would probably go
1.5 degree's less. i think its a bit much.
i do however, prefer the look/stance of the added camber.
if i can have it "any" way i want, i would probably go
1.5 degree's less. i think its a bit much.
#59
Hi Joey. Ah, but I may see now why you hold forth that the rear camber did not aid your cornering.
I suspect, and reason below that too much camber fails to plant the tire a proper footprint on cornering.
For instance, I suspect on my own car that 3 degrees is probably more than is really needed to plant the rear tire flat on hard cornering, even with a lot of body roll.
For illustration of the concept, jack up the opposite side of the cambered car (I have done this) and look at the verticality of the cambered rear wheel on opposite side.
I think it would be ideal if that tire became quite perfectly verticle on moderately hard cornering.
This would require either knowing our body roll quotient, or more ideally, limiting body roll by suspension stiffness -and then- dialing in rear camber (front, too, if wanted) for maximally flat tire footprint for that condition.
I -think- this setup might give the best, most neutral cornering.
We must consider too that when a cambered tire, -which is toed out by necessity of tread life considerations- is made to run vertical, then it's toe-out becomes an added steering force.
In the purer example of cambered rear, the toe out will become an important tendency towards swinging the rear out, as into an oversteer characteristic.
Joey, if your cambered rear does not have this toe-out (if i say) and IF your camber is much in excess of the body roll characteristic (it is), then there you are proved to your actual experience: it did not aid your cornering. It's a fine look, though. Slickly sick for sure.
There's much for me to learn about steering geometry and this n.c. characteristic. At this early point in my learning all I can do is observe my own car, listen to others and look at the thin record regarding "Demon Camber".
---
As you see now the humor several spaces above has a point:
-to reinforce the hard info.
-to make instructional thoughts amusing.
-to encourage the man -with all the camber- to let out his own vision of "the rest of the story". Thank you for that, man..
with a smile and wishing fun for all,
Reid
I suspect, and reason below that too much camber fails to plant the tire a proper footprint on cornering.
For instance, I suspect on my own car that 3 degrees is probably more than is really needed to plant the rear tire flat on hard cornering, even with a lot of body roll.
For illustration of the concept, jack up the opposite side of the cambered car (I have done this) and look at the verticality of the cambered rear wheel on opposite side.
I think it would be ideal if that tire became quite perfectly verticle on moderately hard cornering.
This would require either knowing our body roll quotient, or more ideally, limiting body roll by suspension stiffness -and then- dialing in rear camber (front, too, if wanted) for maximally flat tire footprint for that condition.
I -think- this setup might give the best, most neutral cornering.
We must consider too that when a cambered tire, -which is toed out by necessity of tread life considerations- is made to run vertical, then it's toe-out becomes an added steering force.
In the purer example of cambered rear, the toe out will become an important tendency towards swinging the rear out, as into an oversteer characteristic.
Joey, if your cambered rear does not have this toe-out (if i say) and IF your camber is much in excess of the body roll characteristic (it is), then there you are proved to your actual experience: it did not aid your cornering. It's a fine look, though. Slickly sick for sure.
There's much for me to learn about steering geometry and this n.c. characteristic. At this early point in my learning all I can do is observe my own car, listen to others and look at the thin record regarding "Demon Camber".
---
As you see now the humor several spaces above has a point:
-to reinforce the hard info.
-to make instructional thoughts amusing.
-to encourage the man -with all the camber- to let out his own vision of "the rest of the story". Thank you for that, man..
with a smile and wishing fun for all,
Reid
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darrenohooligan
PPC: Suspension / Brakes
0
09-26-2015 07:21 AM
domincnTC
PPC: Vehicles
0
08-04-2015 01:47 PM
Subaru86
Scion FR-S Suspension & Handling
0
07-31-2015 04:33 AM
Subaru86
Scion FR-S Suspension & Handling
0
07-31-2015 04:00 AM