Monroe Shocks..
#22
I'veheard that the monroes do lower in the front. I believe the overall length is shorter, not effecting the suspension cycle. remember you are comparing 2 diiferent shock deigns, with the monroes not officially a replacement fit.
But yes on the exact same shock, ONLY springs effect ride height.
Later
But yes on the exact same shock, ONLY springs effect ride height.
Later
#23
Senior Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: What's in your Box...
Posts: 14,929
Originally Posted by STLBOX
I'veheard that the monroes do lower in the front. I believe the overall length is shorter, not effecting the suspension cycle. remember you are comparing 2 diiferent shock deigns, with the monroes not officially a replacement fit.
But yes on the exact same shock, ONLY springs effect ride height.
Later
But yes on the exact same shock, ONLY springs effect ride height.
Later
#24
I have tryed to find a pair monoes 5987, but the places i tryed is telling me that, monroes dont have em anymore...( AUTOBARN-)
can I use the 5870's ??? what car are these for ???
Thanks....
Keith.
can I use the 5870's ??? what car are these for ???
Thanks....
Keith.
#25
Originally Posted by Keith
I have tryed to find a pair monoes 5987, but the places i tryed is telling me that, monroes dont have em anymore...( AUTOBARN-)
can I use the 5870's ??? what car are these for ???
Thanks....
Keith.
can I use the 5870's ??? what car are these for ???
Thanks....
Keith.
#26
Senior Member
Music City Scions
SL Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Posts: 11,808
Originally Posted by sikbrik
RTon20s is right...your car should sit at the same height even if you totally remove the shocks.
The reason there is confusion in this thread is because the FRONT Monroes for the Echo actually move the spring seat down farther, which means the spring didn't compress more but the car still got lower. The rear springs don't sit on the shocks so the height will not change UNLESS your stock shocks just have so much pressure that they're able to hold the weight of the car. That's really not even remotely likely.
The reason there is confusion in this thread is because the FRONT Monroes for the Echo actually move the spring seat down farther, which means the spring didn't compress more but the car still got lower. The rear springs don't sit on the shocks so the height will not change UNLESS your stock shocks just have so much pressure that they're able to hold the weight of the car. That's really not even remotely likely.
#28
I had Sensa-Trac shocks on the rear of my xB. It did not....I repeat, DID NOT....sit so much as a mm lower.
As others have mentioned, the front Sensa-Trac struts did add about a 1/2 inch to the drop though.....enough to give it a slightly ranked look with my Tein S-Techs.
As others have mentioned, the front Sensa-Trac struts did add about a 1/2 inch to the drop though.....enough to give it a slightly ranked look with my Tein S-Techs.
#29
Folks, the Monroe shocks in the rear can not and will not lower your vehicle unless you are lowered far enough that you were resting on the bottom limit of travel for your stock shocks.
The front struts will lower the front suspension about .5 inch because the front spring perches on the Monroe struts are welded on about .5 inch lower than on the stock struts.
Shock absorbers do NOT support the weight of the vehicle, the only dampen suspension movement, which is why the Brits call 'em dampers. The only exception to this is shocks specifically designed to increase load capacity. The "pressure" in the OEM and Monroe 5987 shocks is for fluid control to prevent foaming, etc. The amount of "lift" is only a few pounds - you would get much more height change in the rear by simply taking out your spare - or folding the rear seats forward.
Learn how shocks work, guys. The amount of change between OEM and 5987s is about the same as adding or removing ten pounds from the rear cubby. Not even noticible.
(Running 5987s on my xB.)
Tom
The front struts will lower the front suspension about .5 inch because the front spring perches on the Monroe struts are welded on about .5 inch lower than on the stock struts.
Shock absorbers do NOT support the weight of the vehicle, the only dampen suspension movement, which is why the Brits call 'em dampers. The only exception to this is shocks specifically designed to increase load capacity. The "pressure" in the OEM and Monroe 5987 shocks is for fluid control to prevent foaming, etc. The amount of "lift" is only a few pounds - you would get much more height change in the rear by simply taking out your spare - or folding the rear seats forward.
Learn how shocks work, guys. The amount of change between OEM and 5987s is about the same as adding or removing ten pounds from the rear cubby. Not even noticible.
(Running 5987s on my xB.)
Tom
#30
OK ... heres an issue for the general public. I have the Progress Suspension and love the ride over all. I was going to wait and get the Monroes all around this fall, but with prices so low i feel i cant pass this up. My concern ... my front end sits dead even with the top of the wheel/tire combo now, i cant afford to loose another 1/2 inch. Also, by losing a 1/2 inch in the front, and nothing in the rear, my box will now ride with the ___ higher.
Any thoughts or suggestions? Oh yeah, i would also want to replace the tops of the front strut towers, as they are starting to blow out from being lowered. What is the going rate for those toppers from Scion parts dept? Anyone?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
Any thoughts or suggestions? Oh yeah, i would also want to replace the tops of the front strut towers, as they are starting to blow out from being lowered. What is the going rate for those toppers from Scion parts dept? Anyone?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
#31
"My concern ... my front end sits dead even with the top of the wheel/tire combo now, i cant afford to loose another 1/2 inch. Also, by losing a 1/2 inch in the front, and nothing in the rear, my box will now ride with the butt higher."
Same exact thing for me. Anyone have an idea how low you have to be before you're bottoming that shock out?
Same exact thing for me. Anyone have an idea how low you have to be before you're bottoming that shock out?
#33
Alright I am getting ready to order the monroe struts. I used the 2001 Echo to find the struts online. The rear is part #5987. The front is part #71575. I see plenty of post using the 5987 rears, but have not seen anyone talking about the fronts.
Does anyone know if the 71575 front strut is applicable to the xB? Does anyone have "The Monroe® Sensa-Trac® strut with PSD (position sensitive damping) and the Safe Tech™" on the fronts?
Does anyone know if the 71575 front strut is applicable to the xB? Does anyone have "The Monroe® Sensa-Trac® strut with PSD (position sensitive damping) and the Safe Tech™" on the fronts?
#34
From what I've heard, replacing the front struts doesn't give you as much bang for the buck (and installation hassle) as just replacing the rear shocks, so most folks skip doing the struts. Do a search; there are a few folks who've done it.
The Monroe struts will drop you 1/2'' in the front.
The Monroe struts will drop you 1/2'' in the front.
#35
Senior Member
Music City Scions
SL Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Posts: 11,808
Originally Posted by Gsnorgathon
From what I've heard, replacing the front struts doesn't give you as much bang for the buck (and installation hassle) as just replacing the rear shocks, so most folks skip doing the struts. Do a search; there are a few folks who've done it.
The Monroe struts will drop you 1/2'' in the front.
The Monroe struts will drop you 1/2'' in the front.
#37
Yeah your right about the lack of people replacing the fronts. I just cant help feeling half-@$$ about only doing the rears. Monroe is also having a sale for the month of July, where when you buy 3 you get 1 free. Mail-in rebate for the cheapest item. The complete set of 4 comes to $167.16 shipped from rockauto.com. The rebate would be for $31 (the price of one rear shock). Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. But $136 versus $62 for the same ride effect makes a strong arguement. I think I'm going to stick to just the rear, and see what happens from there.
#38
Originally Posted by hotweelz4me
... I just cant help feeling half-@$$ about only doing the rears.... But $136 versus $62 for the same ride effect makes a strong arguement. I think I'm going to stick to just the rear, and see what happens from there.
At all speeds, the overall suspension is just right. It is controlled - not soft and not hard. There is a mile of rough patched pavement on a fast road near me that is unpleasant in any car, but the xB with NAPA SensaTracs in the rear just soaks it up.