How did the 2006 lose power?
#1
How did the 2006 lose power?
I was just at the official scion site and went to look at the specs. The site is now saying 103hp/101 tourqe for both the xA and xB. What is the deal with this?
#4
Toyota is now using SAE horsepower ratings. Check out this article: http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...A01-283759.htm
#7
well it is all the same, It even says on scions website that the engine is the same- just the way they test HP has changed. Honda and Toyota both are retesting thier engines.... the 05' RSX-S was 210 HP, now the 06' has 201 HP. The 3.0 V6 Camry went from 210 HP to 190........
#8
Yeah, they can't use better gas than they recommend to the public, can't super-tune the engines, and can't run 'em with none of the 'normal' driven components like alternator and such attached to get the numbers for advertising..
xA/xB "lost" 5HP in numbers only - same engines, same performance. (One that surprises me is the 3.0 Camry - 20HP difference? That hurts the advertising... )
xA/xB "lost" 5HP in numbers only - same engines, same performance. (One that surprises me is the 3.0 Camry - 20HP difference? That hurts the advertising... )
#10
Originally Posted by UnFocused
well it is all the same.
#11
bHP ratings are for buyers.
wHP ratings are for drivers.
Drivers wanted...wait thats a VDub ad. The xA/B ratings as posted on SL seems to hover around 95wHP. So it's not that bad.
BTW, 2005 Avalon "280bHP," 2006 Avalon "268bHP." So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
wHP ratings are for drivers.
Drivers wanted...wait thats a VDub ad. The xA/B ratings as posted on SL seems to hover around 95wHP. So it's not that bad.
BTW, 2005 Avalon "280bHP," 2006 Avalon "268bHP." So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
#12
Originally Posted by UnFocused
Yeah, My moms 02 camry' V6 ran a 16.2 stock. And my friends 3.5SE Altima with "250" HP ran a 15.9.....
So go figure 60 HP difference and .3 difference in the 1/4?!?!
So go figure 60 HP difference and .3 difference in the 1/4?!?!
granted the 3vzfe in the 92's owed it all to its super beefy low end... god that motor had some torque.
toyota/scion could really make it a whole other ballgame for the xA/xB market if they would release a 1nzge :D but it will never happen...
-jon
#13
Originally Posted by jwa276
Originally Posted by UnFocused
Yeah, My moms 02 camry' V6 ran a 16.2 stock. And my friends 3.5SE Altima with "250" HP ran a 15.9.....
So go figure 60 HP difference and .3 difference in the 1/4?!?!
So go figure 60 HP difference and .3 difference in the 1/4?!?!
granted the 3vzfe in the 92's owed it all to its super beefy low end... god that motor had some torque.
toyota/scion could really make it a whole other ballgame for the xA/xB market if they would release a 1nzge :D but it will never happen...
-jon
Toyota's own website lists the 06 3.0L camry as 190 HP......do you think I make this stuff up?
#14
Originally Posted by Keitaro
So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
Yeah man....something else I found interesting...the xA manual says "use 89 octane (research 91)"
It then goes on to say that the car may ping a bit, and it's normal.
Yeah, ummm, eff you Toyota.
10.5:1 compression.
Toyota admits that running 89 octane will result in pinging...and I guarantee you that if it DOES ping, the only thing stopping it after a couple pings is the knock sensor & ECU retarding the timing.
I'll run 93, thanks. I highly recommend everyone else does too.
#15
BTW, 2005 Avalon "280bHP," 2006 Avalon "268bHP." So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
The other major change required the engines to have the normal belt driven devices and loads actuallty attached and driven by the engine as they would be when installed in the vehicle instead of stripping off the alternator, power steering, and other devices that might take a few horses.
The new HP ratings are closer to what a real-life, factory stock, showroom fresh engine might produce when actually installed in a vehicle and fed it's recommended fuel.
No drive belts, 115 octane avgas and radical timing advances can gain a few horses and foot/pounds on a dyno for the ads...but Joe Public's car will never see them.
#16
Originally Posted by Keitaro
bHP ratings are for buyers.
wHP ratings are for drivers.
Drivers wanted...wait thats a VDub ad. The xA/B ratings as posted on SL seems to hover around 95wHP. So it's not that bad.
BTW, 2005 Avalon "280bHP," 2006 Avalon "268bHP." So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
wHP ratings are for drivers.
Drivers wanted...wait thats a VDub ad. The xA/B ratings as posted on SL seems to hover around 95wHP. So it's not that bad.
BTW, 2005 Avalon "280bHP," 2006 Avalon "268bHP." So Toyota was force to use regular fuel with the new ratings although the Avalon is required to drink Premium? Someone needs to dyno an Avalon.
#17
Originally Posted by UnFocused
Are you referring to me as "mr toyota"
Toyota's own website lists the 06 3.0L camry as 190 HP......do you think I make this stuff up?
Toyota's own website lists the 06 3.0L camry as 190 HP......do you think I make this stuff up?
my parents own a red '00 solara v6 5spd, and a black 99 shortcab tacoma 4cyl 5spd with the trd big wheel/tire package and trd suspension. ive owned that camry v6 5spd (which was a hoss ) and now im driving the scion around wishing i had 3L instead of 1.5L
-jon
#18
Ok, I understand now.....
Yeah, I wonder if the 06' 3.0L with 190 will hurt camry's sales? but like I said look at 1/4 mile times. the Nissan Altima (250 HP, not sure if its the new SAE) and the once 210 HP camry (now 190 SAE) - the Camry runs a quarter mile time within .3-.4 seconds of its 60 HP counterpart.....
But look at our 1.5L- a stock 5spd xB runs 16.9's.......which isnt fast by anymeans, but if you look at civic, focus, neon, Ion, ect- they all have 20-40 more HP than the xB but still run simular times as us.
xA/xB are about 100-400 pounds lighter then the others, so that helps..............
Yeah, I wonder if the 06' 3.0L with 190 will hurt camry's sales? but like I said look at 1/4 mile times. the Nissan Altima (250 HP, not sure if its the new SAE) and the once 210 HP camry (now 190 SAE) - the Camry runs a quarter mile time within .3-.4 seconds of its 60 HP counterpart.....
But look at our 1.5L- a stock 5spd xB runs 16.9's.......which isnt fast by anymeans, but if you look at civic, focus, neon, Ion, ect- they all have 20-40 more HP than the xB but still run simular times as us.
xA/xB are about 100-400 pounds lighter then the others, so that helps..............
#20
Originally Posted by EExA
Uh I run pump 87, no ping, no problem.
Your car pings...you just don't hear it because your ECU is backing off on the timing, resulting is less power & worse mileage.
Congratulations.