xB = Slowest, non-hybrid car on the market?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-07-2006, 09:19 AM

#41

hotbox05

Senior Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal

Posts: 13,706

highlander with the 2.4

camry with the 2.4

there is no way the echo is faster. the scion xb's manual versus an echo manual. the horrendous gear ratios in the echo suck total ****.

10-07-2006, 09:20 AM

#42

hotbox05

Senior Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal

Posts: 13,706

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldYeller

Quote:

Originally Posted by v1_Rotate

Quote:

Originally Posted by black_sand_box

The Echo has got to be slower!

Isn't the xB based on the Echo. And considering the xB probably weighs more, I would say it's quite possible the xB is slower.

As for the the questions stated in this thread, the xB is among the slowest stock cars for sale right now. It has to be, because it is SLOW (but getting 30mpg is all good for me).

Echo a couple hundred pounds lighter and better aerodynamics with same engine---got to be faster.

it as horrendous gearing . auto to auto the eco's/yaris are faster . manual to manual the xB's zippy greas kill the eco/yaris

10-07-2006, 02:55 PM

#43

TheRealBoxster

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 315

3rd

class driving sure beats first class walking!!

10-09-2006, 10:43 PM

#44

whitesuperbox

Member

SL Member

Join Date: Sep 2006

Posts: 65

After having the car for less than a month, all people ask me is, "so the car is pretty slow, huh?" Well, regardless of how fast it can accelerate, I'm consistently passing people on the road. And the engine's not broken in so I don't drive it hard and rarely push it past 4500rpm. Getting to the destination on time and getting 30mpg....that's sweet

10-09-2006, 11:28 PM

#45

TheScionicMan

Senior Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: In the Hot Tub

Posts: 5,736

When I was at the track, the Prius was beating me by almost half a second. I've got an auto with several bolt-ons and light wheels and I could only break under 18 seconds twice out of 18 runs. But you better be on your toes if you plan to leave me at the light...

10-10-2006, 03:52 AM

#46

kevets

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: NoVA

Posts: 232

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbox05

a ha ha . umm yeah in a vette. yea , um NO.

motorswap should get me into high 13's. just gotta save up and then start collecting tons and tons of parts and such. and 14's on street tires will make me pretty happy.

Alright, there is just something a bit scary to me about a car like the xB having some power. Won't it just roll like a dice game if it gets going to fast in a turn? btw I am loving the talk of engine swaps.. that sounds like some potentially great stuff.

10-10-2006, 05:16 AM

#47

hotbox05

Senior Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal

Posts: 13,706

if you are at stock height with dead shocks yes. if you are lowered on stock shocks probably not , if you are dropped 4 inches up front and 3 inches out back on racing coilovers like I am ? HELL no. lol

10-10-2006, 02:32 PM

#48

tuvanhillbilly

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: Palmyra, VA

Posts: 163

I think the big difference here is manual vs auto. I've got a 2006 xb with the 5 speed, my wife has a 2006 xa with the automatic. Driving them is like night and day. The main difference is that I can control the engine revs with the manual. If I'm in the mood for some spirited driving, I'll keep the revs in the 4k range (especially fun on the twisties). The tall gearing in the auto just can't compete--I hate driving the wife's car.

10-10-2006, 05:13 PM

#49

TheScionicMan

Senior Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: In the Hot Tub

Posts: 5,736

It's not that big of a difference, IMO. I was less than a second slower than manual xBs with somewhat similar setups. I don't think any of the sticks were getting out of the 17s.

10-10-2006, 05:19 PM

#50

rvpps2rocks

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: Simi Valley, CA

Posts: 1,661

i know you said in stock form and i know i will probably get chewed out about this but. DROP A TURBO in the biznatch. im sure u could take some names then...ahahah

10-10-2006, 05:43 PM

#51

citizen01

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: SoCal

Posts: 940

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbox05

Wow engine swapping, etc... sounds like a lot of money. Maybe even enough to spring for a sports car as opposed to economy since apparently that's what you want.

10-10-2006, 05:47 PM

#52

TheScionicMan

Senior Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: In the Hot Tub

Posts: 5,736

It's not about going fast, it's about making THIS car go faster...

10-10-2006, 05:53 PM

#53

cherryBox

Senior Member

SL Member
Scinergy

Join Date: Oct 2005

Location: ScinergyCO

Posts: 6,157

Quote:

Originally Posted by firesquare

Quote:

Originally Posted by NotAllBad

If you're looking for speed, you got the wrong car.

i agree

10-11-2006, 05:13 AM

#54

hotbox05

Senior Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal

Posts: 13,706

Quote:

Originally Posted by citizen01

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbox05

Wow engine swapping, etc... sounds like a lot of money. Maybe even enough to spring for a sports car as opposed to economy since apparently that's what you want.

it's a money pit like most cars are for most is not all car enthusiasts .

just trying to make this car the best it can possibly be. i still have motorcycles for speed.

10-11-2006, 05:43 AM

#55

13edge

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: Raleigh, NC

Posts: 818

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbox05

it's a money pit like most cars are for most is not all car enthusiasts.

Never a truer statement. You know you're hooked on modding a car when you hang up the phone after ordering leopard print carpet for the roof of your Cadillac... the outside of the roof... so you can get that true pimp look. I miss that car...

10-11-2006, 11:59 PM

#56

PIMPmyPride

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: U.S.

Posts: 160

Just though I add one other car that is slower than the xB.

10-12-2006, 06:55 PM

#57

rvpps2rocks

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: Simi Valley, CA

Posts: 1,661

Flintstones?

10-12-2006, 08:38 PM

#58

PIMPmyPride

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: U.S.

Posts: 160

Hey, this car and boat it for sale too!
Just a measly $13,998.00 ! and it's all yours!. lol

03-04-2008, 02:27 AM

#59

koalaty2

Senior Member

SL Member

Join Date: Feb 2005

Location: Lancaster, CA

Posts: 595

Lets set the record straight right away for the 2008 models. If I remember correctly, 1st gen xB's, manual shift was in the high 9's 0-60, and auto in the mid 10's.
We are as fast as at least 30 new 2008's (I just listed the 10's and over) . Of course these would be times with the smallest engine selection. (We just didn't happen to have an engine choice)
Consumer Reports Apr 08 edition. Chevy Avalance 10.1, Aveo 11.7, Dodge Caliber 10.5, Grand Caravan 10.3, Ford Escape 10.5, Explorer SportTrac 10.6, Honda CR-V 10.6, Civic 10.1, Element 10.4, Fit 12.4, Hummer H3 11.5, Hyundai Accent 12.5, Elantra 10.4, Tucson 10.1, Jeep Compas 10.1, Patriot 10.8, Wrangler 10.7, Kia Rio 12.8, Spectra 11.4, Sportage 11.3, Mazda Tributo 10.5, Mazda5 10.3, Mercury Mariner 10.5, Nissan Versa 10.1, Sabaru Legacy/Outback 10.8, Forester 10.0, Forenza 11.3, SX-4 12.2, Toyota Prius 10.5, Yaris 11.4.
We are not slow, just not quick.