Intake ?'s
#1
Intake ?'s
When I was installing my SRI I noticed that there was a secondary filter permanently attached to the air box lid. Does anyone know what that is? Can you run it without it? I was thinking about taking it out of my wife’s 09 xB. Also what is the extra air box mounted to the intake tube closer to the motor?
#2
The secondary filter is the charcoal filter that is what makes your intake emissions legal. You can run without it but technically you wont pass a SMOG test if you do. The second "air box" is a silencer for your intake.
#4
Speaking for my butt dyno, removal of the intake emissions filter from the OE air-box cover has no perceptible impact on performance. The mod to the OE that really packs a punch is removal of the snorkel. Beyond that, you can convert the OE into CAI, or you can buy an aftermarket CAI or SRI.
#5
Alright, as soon as the wife leaves to go shopping I'll go pop the hood and try and put eyes on the snorkel. She is never happy when I start removing parts on a new car. Any hacking or cutting required or just simple nuts, bolts and clips?
#6
Not sure, but I think this DIY is what you're looking to do, it's to convert the OEM intake into a CAI:
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=111524
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=111524
#7
#8
Just to clarify, that filter is only to prevent venting fuel vapors to atmosphere through the airbox. Unless an unusually well-trained and gung-ho emmissions tester actually opens the air box to look for it and notices it missing, you'll fly through any emmissions test. Here in MD all they do is plug into the OBD2 port and look for codes.
#9
Thanks for the feedback. I went and looked at it earlier and was very surprised that anyone would intentionally put crap like that on an intake. It's coming OFF.
Anyone noted any mpg improvements?
Anyone noted any mpg improvements?
#10
You're welcome. FWIW, as previously stated, I agree that the charcoal filter isn't terribly restrictive. I just wanted to clarify that removing it should have no effect on passing an emission test in most, if not all, states. I'd be shocked if removing it resulted in a measureable mpg improvement and equally shocked if someone didn't claim that it did.
#12
Removal of the snorkel improves the ability of the engine to breath, forget mpg, the days of primitive engine designs are long gone. If your goal is mpg, leave the snorkel in and make a point of maintaining tire pressure. If your goal is overall responsiveness, dump the snorkel, go easy on the throttle, and maintain a respectable tire pressure (both the latter assist mpg). I use 35psi (when I don't forget ), but the recommended values are specified on a plate at the lower rear of the drivers door.
#13
Actually the snorkel does draw air from a cooler location than the airbox will without it. IMO you'd gain more power by re-locating the snorkel similarly to the DIY link that CIONIDE posted. I'd get the TRD vent and place the snorkel end behind it. The downsides are that it won't sound any better and the snorkel may possibly be a bit small for maximum airflow at high rpm. Even better you could replace the snorkel hose with larger hose like Trevor did. This way you get improved sound, more flow and more peak power. Better still, adding a large scoop or velocity stack to the hose end would create a ram air effect at speed.
Hydro-lock shouldn't be a concern with this setup since the water would have to fill the airbox faster than it drains out before hydro-lock could occur. To be even safer, enlarge the existing airbox drain holes, add more or leave a small opening in bottom of the intake hose so there won't be enough vacuum to suck up water. Good luck.
Last edited by ScionFred; 09-19-2011 at 03:56 PM.
#16
#17
#18
You'll notice directly beneath my installed flap two bolts that anchor the air-box base to the transaxle (the third bolt not being visible in this photo, but no less present). The OE air-box base provides no openings were I show a flap -- I specifically created a hidden opening for the purpose of hydrolock protection. Speaking for myself, I never identified any openings within the OE airbox that would protect in any way against hydrolock. However, given the high location of the OE snorkel air inlet in the forward engine compartment, there was no need on Toyota's part to provide such protection. It's only if one chooses to modify the OE air inlet that such considerations become appropriate.